• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响基层医疗医生对患有复杂多种慢性病患者决策的因素:一项定性访谈研究

Factors affecting primary care physician decision-making for patients with complex multimorbidity: a qualitative interview study.

作者信息

Schuttner Linnaea, Hockett Sherlock Stacey, Simons Carol, Ralston James D, Rosland Ann-Marie, Nelson Karin, Lee Jennifer R, Sayre George

机构信息

Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, Washington, 98108, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 5;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01633-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-022-01633-x
PMID:35123398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8817776/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple chronic conditions (multimorbidity) and additional psychosocial complexity are at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Establishing treatment or care plans for these patients must account for their disease interactions, finite self-management abilities, and even conflicting treatment recommendations from clinical practice guidelines. Despite existing insight into how primary care physicians (PCPs) approach care decisions for their patients in general, less is known about how PCPs make care planning decisions for more complex populations particularly within a medical home setting. We therefore sought to describe factors affecting physician decision-making when care planning for complex patients with multimorbidity within the team-based, patient-centered medical home setting in the integrated healthcare system of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

METHODS

This was a qualitative study involving semi-structured telephone interviews with PCPs working > 40% time in VHA clinics. Interviews were conducted from April to July, 2020. Content was analyzed with deductive and inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

23 physicians participated in interviews; most were MDs (n = 21) and worked in hospital-affiliated clinics (n = 14) across all regions of the VHA's national clinic network. We found internal, external, and relationship-based factors, with developed subthemes describing factors affecting decision-making for complex patients with multimorbidity. Physicians described tailoring decisions to individual patients; making decisions in keeping with an underlying internal style or habit; working towards an overarching goal for care; considering impacts from patient access and resources on care plans; deciding within boundaries provided by organizational structures; collaborating on care plans with their care team; and impacts on decisions from their own emotions and relationship with patient.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPs described internal, external, and relationship-based factors that affected their care planning for high-risk and complex patients with multimorbidity in the VHA. Findings offer useful strategies employed by physicians to effectively conduct care planning for complex patients in a medical home setting, such as delegation of follow-up within multidisciplinary care teams, optimizing visit time vs frequency, and deliberate investment in patient-centered relationship building to gain buy-in to care plans.

摘要

背景

患有多种慢性病(共病)且伴有额外心理社会复杂性的患者出现不良后果的风险更高。为这些患者制定治疗或护理计划时,必须考虑到他们疾病之间的相互作用、有限的自我管理能力,甚至临床实践指南中相互冲突的治疗建议。尽管目前已经了解初级保健医生(PCP)总体上如何为患者做出护理决策,但对于初级保健医生如何为更复杂的人群制定护理计划,尤其是在医疗之家环境中,了解较少。因此,我们试图描述在美国退伍军人事务部(VHA)综合医疗系统中,基于团队、以患者为中心的医疗之家环境下,为患有共病的复杂患者进行护理计划时影响医生决策的因素。

方法

这是一项定性研究,对在VHA诊所工作时间超过40%的初级保健医生进行半结构化电话访谈。访谈于2020年4月至7月进行。采用演绎和归纳主题分析法对内容进行分析。

结果

23名医生参与了访谈;大多数是医学博士(n = 21),在VHA全国诊所网络的所有地区的医院附属诊所工作(n = 14)。我们发现了内部、外部和基于关系的因素,并有已形成的子主题描述了影响患有共病的复杂患者决策的因素。医生们描述了根据个体患者情况量身定制决策;按照潜在的内部风格或习惯做出决策;朝着总体护理目标努力;考虑患者就医机会和资源对护理计划的影响;在组织结构规定的范围内做出决策;与护理团队就护理计划进行协作;以及自身情绪和与患者的关系对决策的影响。

结论

初级保健医生描述了影响他们在VHA中为患有共病的高危和复杂患者进行护理计划的内部、外部和基于关系的因素。研究结果提供了医生在医疗之家环境中为复杂患者有效进行护理计划所采用的有用策略,例如在多学科护理团队中委托进行随访、优化就诊时间与频率,以及有意识地投入以建立以患者为中心的关系,从而使患者接受护理计划。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting primary care physician decision-making for patients with complex multimorbidity: a qualitative interview study.影响基层医疗医生对患有复杂多种慢性病患者决策的因素:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 5;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01633-x.
2
My Goals Are Not Their Goals: Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of Patient-Centered Care for Patients with Multimorbidity.我的目标不是他们的目标:为患有多种疾病的患者提供以患者为中心的护理的障碍和促进因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4189-4196. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07533-1. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Primary Care Physician Perspectives on the Influence of Patient Values, Health Priorities, and Preferences on Clinical Decision-Making for Complex Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.基层医疗医生对患者价值观、健康优先事项和偏好对患有多种疾病的复杂患者临床决策影响的看法:一项定性研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 16;15:2135-2146. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S380021. eCollection 2022.
4
Person-centred and efficient care delivery for high-need, high-cost patients: primary care professionals' experiences.以患者为中心且高效的高需求、高花费患者医疗服务提供:基层医疗专业人员的经验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01172-3.
5
Understanding the processes behind the decisions - GPs and complex multimorbidity decision making.理解决策背后的过程——全科医生与复杂多重疾病的决策制定。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01781-0.
6
Factors affecting primary care implementation for older veterans with multimorbidity in Veterans Health Administration (VA).影响退伍军人健康管理局(VA)中老年多病患者初级保健实施的因素。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1057-1068. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13859. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
7
Primary Care Physicians' Experiences With and Strategies for Managing Electronic Messages.初级保健医生处理电子信息的经验及策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918287. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18287.
8
Primary care providers' experiences caring for complex patients in primary care: a qualitative study.初级保健提供者在初级保健中照顾复杂患者的经历:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:34. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0433-z.
9
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
10
Using a person-centered approach in clinical care for patients with complex chronic conditions: Perspectives from healthcare professionals caring for Veterans with COPD in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration's Whole Health System of Care.以患者为中心的方法在慢性复杂疾病患者的临床护理中的应用:美国退伍军人事务部全健康照护系统中照顾 COPD 退伍军人的医疗保健专业人员的观点。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0286326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286326. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the impact of hospital organizational behavior on physicians'patient-centered care.医院组织行为对医生以患者为中心的医疗服务的影响研究。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;83(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01620-5.
2
Underlying motivations hampering Flemish primary care physicians from overcoming the barriers in osteoporosis care: an EMR-facilitated clinical reasoning study.阻碍佛兰德初级保健医生克服骨质疏松症护理障碍的潜在动机:一项基于电子病历的临床推理研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 16;23(1):1428. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10441-7.
3
The impact of COVID-19 on Australian clinicians' decision making in line with the principles of Choosing Wisely.COVID-19 对澳大利亚临床医生遵循明智选择原则做出决策的影响。
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7788-7795. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2026. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
4
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people.干预措施以改善老年人的药物合用(polypharmacy)的合理使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 11;10(10):CD008165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub5.
5
Primary Care Physician Perspectives on the Influence of Patient Values, Health Priorities, and Preferences on Clinical Decision-Making for Complex Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.基层医疗医生对患者价值观、健康优先事项和偏好对患有多种疾病的复杂患者临床决策影响的看法:一项定性研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 16;15:2135-2146. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S380021. eCollection 2022.
6
Understanding the processes behind the decisions - GPs and complex multimorbidity decision making.理解决策背后的过程——全科医生与复杂多重疾病的决策制定。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01781-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review.老年多病共存患者共同决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02050-y.
2
Mixed Methods Evaluation of Reasons Why Care Deviates From Clinical Guidelines Among Patients With Multimorbidity.多病共存患者护理偏离临床指南原因的混合方法评估
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Feb;79(1):102-113. doi: 10.1177/1077558720975543. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
Decision making biases in the allied health professions: A systematic scoping review.辅助卫生专业人员的决策偏差:系统范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240716. eCollection 2020.
4
Use of General Primary Care, Specialized Primary Care, and Other Veterans Affairs Services Among High-Risk Veterans.高危 Veterans 中普通初级保健、专科初级保健和其他 Veterans Affairs 服务的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208120. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8120.
5
Priorities of patients with multimorbidity and of clinicians regarding treatment and health outcomes: a systematic mixed studies review.多发病患者和临床医生在治疗和健康结果方面的优先事项:系统混合研究综述。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e033445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033445.
6
The epidemiology of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.初级保健中多种疾病的流行病学:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Apr;68(669):e245-e251. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695465. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
'The Hand on the Doorknob': Visit Agenda Setting by Complex Patients and Their Primary Care Physicians.《门把手之握:复杂患者及其初级保健医生的就诊议程设置》。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;31(1):29-37. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170167.
8
Evidence on multimorbidity from definition to intervention: An overview of systematic reviews.从定义到干预的多病共存证据:系统评价概述。
Ageing Res Rev. 2017 Aug;37:53-68. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 13.
9
Defining Team Effort Involved in Patient Care from the Primary Care Physician's Perspective.从初级保健医生的角度定义患者护理中的团队协作。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):269-276. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3897-6. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Clinical Recommendations in Medical Practice: A Proposed Framework to Reduce Bias and Improve the Quality of Medical Decisions.医学实践中的临床建议:一个减少偏差并提高医疗决策质量的建议框架。
J Clin Ethics. 2016 Spring;27(1):21-7.