Suppr超能文献

开发和可用性测试工具,以促进在知识转化中纳入交叉性。

Development and usability testing of tools to facilitate incorporating intersectionality in knowledge translation.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 379 - 753 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0W3, Canada.

George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, 379- 753 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0W3, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08181-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The field of knowledge translation (KT) has been criticized for neglecting contextual and social considerations that influence health equity. Intersectionality, a concept introduced by Black feminist scholars, emphasizes how human experience is shaped by combinations of social factors (e.g., ethnicity, gender) embedded in systemic power structures. Its use has the potential to advance equity considerations in KT. Our objective was to develop and conduct usability testing of tools to support integrating intersectionality in KT through three key phases of KT: identifying the gap; assessing barriers to knowledge use; and selecting, tailoring, and implementing interventions.

METHODS

We used an integrated KT approach and assembled an interdisciplinary development committee who drafted tools. We used a mixed methods approach for usability testing with KT intervention developers that included semi-structured interviews and the System Usability Scale (SUS). We calculated an average SUS score for each tool. We coded interview data using the framework method focusing on actionable feedback. The development committee used the feedback to revise tools, which were formatted by a graphic designer.

RESULTS

Nine people working in Canada joined the development committee. They drafted an intersectionality primer and one tool that included recommendations, activities, reflection prompts, and resources for each of the three implementation phases. Thirty-one KT intervention developers from three countries participated in usability testing. They suggested the tools to be shorter, contain more visualizations, and use less jargon. Average SUS scores of the draft tools ranged between 60 and 78/100. The development committee revised and shortened all tools, and added two, one-page summary documents. The final toolkit included six documents.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and evaluated tools to help embed intersectionality considerations in KT. These tools go beyond recommending the use of intersectionality to providing practical guidance on how to do this. Future work should develop guidance for enhancing social justice in intersectionality-enhanced KT.

摘要

背景

知识转化(KT)领域因忽视影响健康公平的背景和社会因素而受到批评。交叉性是黑人女权主义学者提出的一个概念,强调人类经验是如何受到系统权力结构中嵌入的社会因素(如种族、性别)组合的影响。它的使用有可能促进 KT 中的公平考虑。我们的目标是开发和测试工具,以支持通过 KT 的三个关键阶段(即确定差距;评估知识应用的障碍;选择、调整和实施干预措施)将交叉性纳入 KT。

方法

我们采用了综合 KT 方法,并组建了一个跨学科的开发委员会,委员会起草了工具。我们采用了混合方法对 KT 干预开发者进行了可用性测试,包括半结构化访谈和系统可用性量表(SUS)。我们为每个工具计算了平均 SUS 分数。我们使用框架方法对访谈数据进行编码,重点是可操作的反馈。开发委员会使用反馈来修改工具,这些工具由图形设计师格式化。

结果

来自三个国家的 31 名 KT 干预开发者参与了可用性测试。他们建议工具更简短,包含更多的可视化效果,并减少行话。草案工具的平均 SUS 分数在 60 到 78/100 之间。开发委员会修改并缩短了所有工具,并添加了两个一页摘要文件。最终的工具包包括六个文件。

结论

我们开发并评估了工具,以帮助将交叉性考虑纳入 KT。这些工具不仅建议使用交叉性,还提供了关于如何做到这一点的实用指南。未来的工作应该制定指导意见,以加强交叉性增强 KT 中的社会正义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efc0/9238081/0a51e80acdde/12913_2022_8181_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验