Suppr超能文献

三种基于网络的知识转化工具的比较可用性分析及家长偏好:多方法研究

Comparative Usability Analysis and Parental Preferences of Three Web-Based Knowledge Translation Tools: Multimethod Study.

作者信息

Anzinger Harrison, Elliott Sarah Alexandra, Hartling Lisa

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Cochrane Child Health, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 13;22(3):e14562. doi: 10.2196/14562.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Connecting parents to research evidence is known to improve health decision making. However, guidance on how to develop effective knowledge translation (KT) tools that synthesize child-health evidence into a form understandable by parents is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative usability analysis of three Web-based KT tools to identify differences in tool effectiveness, identify which format parents prefer, and better understand what factors affect usability for parents.

METHODS

We evaluated a Cochrane plain language summary (PLS), Blogshot, and a Wikipedia page on a specific child-health topic (acute otitis media). A mixed method approach was used involving a knowledge test, written usability questionnaire, and a semistructured interview. Differences in knowledge and usability questionnaire scores for each of the KT tools were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests, considering a critical significance value of P=.05. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize and identify common parent preferences among the semistructured interviews. Key elements parents wanted in a KT tool were derived through author consensus using questionnaire data and parent interviews.

RESULTS

In total, 16 parents (9 female) with a mean age of 39.6 (SD 11.9) years completed the study. Parents preferred the Blogshot over the PLS and Wikipedia page (P=.002) and found the Blogshot to be the most aesthetic (P=.001) and easiest to use (P=.001). Knowledge questions and usability survey data also indicated that the Blogshot was the most preferred and effective KT tool at relaying information about the topic. Four key themes were derived from thematic analysis, describing elements parents valued in KT tools. Parents wanted tools that were (1) simple, (2) quick to access and use, and (3) trustworthy, and which (4) informed how to manage the condition. Out of the three KT tools assessed, Blogshots were the most preferred tool by parents and encompassed these four key elements.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that child health evidence be available in formats accessible and understandable by parents to improve decision making, use of health care resources, and health outcomes. Further usability testing of different KT tools should be conducted involving broader populations and other conditions (eg, acute vs chronic) to generate guidelines to improve KT tools for parents.

摘要

背景

众所周知,让家长接触研究证据有助于改善健康决策。然而,目前缺乏关于如何开发有效的知识转化(KT)工具的指导,这些工具能够将儿童健康证据综合成家长易于理解的形式。

目的

本研究的目的是对三种基于网络的KT工具进行比较可用性分析,以确定工具有效性的差异,确定家长更喜欢哪种形式,并更好地了解哪些因素会影响家长对工具的可用性。

方法

我们评估了Cochrane简明语言摘要(PLS)、Blogshot以及一个关于特定儿童健康主题(急性中耳炎)的维基百科页面。采用了混合方法,包括知识测试、书面可用性问卷和半结构化访谈。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析了每个KT工具在知识和可用性问卷得分上的差异,显著性临界值为P = 0.05。采用主题分析来综合和确定半结构化访谈中家长的共同偏好。通过对问卷数据和家长访谈进行作者共识,得出家长在KT工具中希望具备的关键要素。

结果

共有16名家长(9名女性)完成了研究,平均年龄为39.6(标准差11.9)岁。家长更喜欢Blogshot,而不是PLS和维基百科页面(P = 0.002),并认为Blogshot最具美感(P = 0.001)且最易于使用(P = 0.001)。知识问题和可用性调查数据还表明,Blogshot是在传达有关该主题信息方面最受青睐且最有效的KT工具。主题分析得出了四个关键主题,描述了家长在KT工具中看重的要素。家长希望工具(1)简单,(2)便于快速获取和使用,(3)值得信赖,并且(4)能告知如何处理病情。在评估的三种KT工具中,Blogshot是家长最喜欢的工具,并且包含了这四个关键要素。

结论

以家长易于获取和理解的形式提供儿童健康证据对于改善决策、医疗资源利用和健康结果非常重要。应针对更广泛的人群和其他病症(如急性与慢性)对不同的KT工具进行进一步的可用性测试,以制定改进针对家长的KT工具的指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7a/7101501/2f78604c18bf/jmir_v22i3e14562_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验