Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;38(4):423-427. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000844.
The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased significantly over the last several decades. The majority of EAC patients present without a prior history of Barrett's esophagus (BE). As a result, endoscopic surveillance has made a suboptimal impact on EAC survival. These concerns raise serious question whether the time has come to take a different direction. The aim of this article is to review evolving evidence of EAC phenotypes and risk factors.
A recent study has identified two phenotypes of EAC based on the presence or absence of intestinal metaplasia (IM) in the background of the tumor (BE/IM and non-BE/IM). The study found that one-half of patients with EAC have the non-BE/IM phenotype, which is associated with more aggressive behavior and worse survival. A retrospective review demonstrates that the proportion of the two phenotypes has been stable over the last decades. Similarly, the increasing incidence of EAC cannot be explained by an increased frequency of new, unique risk factors but rather by a higher prevalence of already known risk factors. Emerging data also demonstrates that, whereas reflux symptoms are an unreliable feature for screening regardless of phenotype, the absence of reflux symptoms is more common for the non-BE/IM. Differences in the degree of genomic methylation and immune response might explain the two phenotypes at a genomic level.
EAC phenotypes have implications for tumor behavior and phenotypic differences might underlie our suboptimal screening efforts. Future screening efforts should not uniformly rely on reflux symptoms as a prerequisite for screening and should consider alternatives to the current screening strategy.
在过去几十年中,食管腺癌(EAC)的发病率显著增加。大多数 EAC 患者在没有 Barrett 食管(BE)病史的情况下出现。因此,内镜监测对 EAC 患者的生存率并没有产生理想的效果。这些问题引发了一个严重的质疑,即是否已经到了需要采取不同方向的时候了。本文旨在综述 EAC 表型和危险因素的最新研究进展。
最近的一项研究根据肿瘤背景中是否存在肠上皮化生(IM)将 EAC 分为两种表型(BE/IM 和非 BE/IM)。研究发现,EAC 患者中有一半存在非 BE/IM 表型,其具有更具侵袭性的行为和更差的生存率。一项回顾性研究表明,在过去几十年中,两种表型的比例一直保持稳定。同样,EAC 发病率的增加不能用新的、独特的危险因素的频率增加来解释,而只能用已知危险因素的患病率增加来解释。新出现的数据还表明,无论表型如何,反流症状作为筛查的一个不可靠特征,但非 BE/IM 患者中反流症状的缺失更为常见。基因组甲基化和免疫反应程度的差异可能在基因组水平上解释了这两种表型。
EAC 表型对肿瘤行为有影响,表型差异可能是我们筛查效果不佳的原因。未来的筛查工作不应该一概依赖反流症状作为筛查的前提条件,应该考虑替代当前的筛查策略。