Suppr超能文献

科学和监管政策委员会在非临床研究中评估医疗器械植入部位的考虑要点。

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider for Medical Device Implant Site Evaluation in Nonclinical Studies.

机构信息

Charles River Laboratories, Frederick, Maryland, USA.

JCL Schuh, PLLC, Bainbridge Island, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Pathol. 2022 Jun;50(4):512-530. doi: 10.1177/01926233221103202. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Abstract

Nonclinical implantation studies are a common and often critical step for medical device safety assessment in the bench-to-market pathway. Nonclinical implanted medical devices or drug-device combination products require complex macroscopic and microscopic pathology evaluations due to the physical presence of the device itself and unique tissue responses to device materials. The Medical Device Implant Site Evaluation working group of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology's (STP) Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee (SRPC) was tasked with reviewing scientific, technical, and regulatory considerations for these studies. Implant site evaluations require highly specialized methods and analytical schemes that should be designed on a case-by-case basis to address specific study objectives. Existing STP best practice recommendations can serve as a framework when performing nonclinical studies under Good Laboratory Practices and help mitigate limitations in standards and guidances for implant evaluations (e.g., those from the International Organization for Standardization [ISO], ASTM International). This article integrates standards referenced by sponsors and regulatory bodies with practical pathology evaluation methods for implantable medical devices and combination products. The goal is to ensure the maximum accuracy and scientific relevance of pathology data acquired during a medical device or combination drug-device implantation study.

摘要

非临床植入研究是医疗器械安全评估从实验室到市场途径中的常见且通常是关键的步骤。由于医疗器械本身的物理存在以及对器械材料的独特组织反应,需要对非临床植入医疗器械或药物-医疗器械组合产品进行复杂的宏观和微观病理学评估。毒理学病理学学会(STP)科学和监管政策委员会(SRPC)的医疗器械植入部位评估工作组负责审查这些研究的科学、技术和监管方面的考虑因素。植入部位评估需要高度专业化的方法和分析方案,应根据具体研究目标进行个案设计。现有的 STP 最佳实践建议可作为在良好实验室规范下进行非临床研究的框架,并有助于减轻植入评估标准和指南(例如,国际标准化组织[ISO]、ASTM International)的局限性。本文将赞助商和监管机构参考的标准与可用于植入式医疗器械和组合产品的实际病理学评估方法相结合。目标是确保在医疗器械或组合药物-医疗器械植入研究期间获得的病理学数据具有最大的准确性和科学性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验