• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放化疗后胶质母细胞瘤与 IDH 突变型 4 级星形细胞瘤复发模式的回顾性匹配队列分析。

Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook 151192Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Radiation Oncology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221109650. doi: 10.1177/15330338221109650.

DOI:10.1177/15330338221109650
PMID:35762826
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9247382/
Abstract

To quantitatively compare the recurrence patterns of glioblastoma (isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type) versus grade 4 isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma (wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase, respectively) following primary chemoradiation. A retrospective matched cohort of 22 wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and 22 mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients were matched by sex, extent of resection, and corpus callosum involvement. The recurrent gross tumor volume was compared to the original gross tumor volume and clinical target volume contours from radiotherapy planning. Failure patterns were quantified by the incidence and volume of the recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume, and positional differences of the recurrent gross tumor volume centroid from the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume. The gross tumor volume was smaller for wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase patients compared to the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase cohort (mean ± SD: 46.5 ± 26.0 cm vs 72.2 ± 45.4 cm,  = .026). The recurrent gross tumor volume was 10.7 ± 26.9 cm and 46.9 ± 55.0 cm smaller than the gross tumor volume for the same groups ( = .018). The recurrent gross tumor volume extended outside the gross tumor volume in 22 (100%) and 15 (68%) (= .009) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively; however, the volume of recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume was not significantly different (12.4 ± 16.1 cm vs 8.4 ± 14.2 cm,  = .443). The recurrent gross tumor volume centroid was within 5.7 mm of the closest gross tumor volume edge for 21 (95%) and 22 (100%) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively. The recurrent gross tumor volume extended beyond the gross tumor volume less often in mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients possibly implying a differential response to chemoradiotherapy and suggesting isocitrate dehydrogenase status might be used to personalize radiotherapy. The results require validation in prospective randomized trials.

摘要

为了定量比较原发性放化疗后胶质母细胞瘤(异柠檬酸脱氢酶野生型)与 4 级异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变型星形细胞瘤(野生型异柠檬酸脱氢酶和突变型异柠檬酸脱氢酶)的复发模式。对 22 例野生型异柠檬酸脱氢酶和 22 例突变型异柠檬酸脱氢酶患者进行了回顾性匹配队列研究,匹配因素为性别、切除范围和胼胝体受累。将复发性大体肿瘤体积与放疗计划的原始大体肿瘤体积和临床靶区体积轮廓进行比较。通过复发大体肿瘤体积超出大体肿瘤体积和临床靶区体积的发生率和体积以及复发大体肿瘤体积质心与大体肿瘤体积和临床靶区体积的位置差异来量化失败模式。与突变型异柠檬酸脱氢酶组相比,野生型异柠檬酸脱氢酶患者的大体肿瘤体积较小(平均值±标准差:46.5±26.0 cm 与 72.2±45.4 cm, = .026)。复发的大体肿瘤体积比同一组的大体肿瘤体积小 10.7±26.9 cm 和 46.9±55.0 cm( = .018)。在 22 例(100%)和 15 例(68%)野生型异柠檬酸脱氢酶和突变型异柠檬酸脱氢酶患者中,复发的大体肿瘤体积延伸至大体肿瘤体积之外( = .009);然而,大体肿瘤体积之外的复发大体肿瘤体积体积没有显著差异(12.4±16.1 cm 与 8.4±14.2 cm, = .443)。在 21 例(95%)和 22 例(100%)野生型异柠檬酸脱氢酶和突变型异柠檬酸脱氢酶患者中,复发大体肿瘤体积质心与最近的大体肿瘤体积边缘的距离均在 5.7 mm 以内。突变型异柠檬酸脱氢酶患者的复发大体肿瘤体积较少延伸至大体肿瘤体积之外,这可能表明对放化疗有不同的反应,并表明异柠檬酸脱氢酶状态可能用于个体化放疗。这些结果需要在前瞻性随机试验中验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/d091756662c0/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/57907f10dd84/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/1c5e680fde68/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/59a2f87dc6bf/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/d091756662c0/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/57907f10dd84/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/1c5e680fde68/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/59a2f87dc6bf/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/9247382/d091756662c0/10.1177_15330338221109650-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis.放化疗后胶质母细胞瘤与 IDH 突变型 4 级星形细胞瘤复发模式的回顾性匹配队列分析。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221109650. doi: 10.1177/15330338221109650.
2
Predictors of Tumor Dynamics Over a 6-Week Course of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Glioblastoma and the Effect on Survival.预测胶质母细胞瘤同步放化疗 6 周过程中的肿瘤动力学及其对生存的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Nov 1;120(3):750-759. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.036. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
3
Prediction of IDH Status Through MRI Features and Enlightened Reflection on the Delineation of Target Volume in Low-Grade Gliomas.通过 MRI 特征预测 IDH 状态,并对低级别胶质瘤靶区勾画进行深入思考。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan 1;18:1533033819877167. doi: 10.1177/1533033819877167.
4
Molecular Evolution of Wild-Type Glioblastomas Treated With Standard of Care Affects Survival and Design of Precision Medicine Trials: A Report From the EORTC 1542 Study.标准治疗下的野生型胶质母细胞瘤的分子进化会影响生存和精准医学试验的设计:来自 EORTC 1542 研究的报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;38(1):81-99. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00367. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
5
Glioblastomas with IDH1/2 mutations have a short clinical history and have a favorable clinical outcome.携带异柠檬酸脱氢酶1/2(IDH1/2)突变的胶质母细胞瘤临床病程短,临床预后良好。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan;46(1):31-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv170. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
6
In vivo Metabolic Profiles as Determined by P and short TE H MR-Spectroscopy : No Difference Between Patients with IDH Wildtype and IDH Mutant Gliomas.体内代谢谱的 P 和短 TE H MRS 光谱测定:IDH 野生型和 IDH 突变型胶质瘤患者之间无差异。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;29(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0630-8. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
7
Wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase under the spotlight in glioblastoma.野生型异柠檬酸脱氢酶成为胶质母细胞瘤研究焦点
Oncogene. 2022 Jan;41(5):613-621. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-02056-1. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
8
Refinement of response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) using non-enhancing lesion type and contrast enhancement evolution pattern in IDH wild-type glioblastomas.采用 IDH 野生型胶质母细胞瘤的非强化病灶类型和对比增强演变模式对神经肿瘤学(RANO)反应评估进行细化。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 1;21(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08414-2.
9
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-type Glial Tumors, Including Glioblastoma.异柠檬酸脱氢酶野生型神经胶质瘤肿瘤,包括胶质母细胞瘤。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;36(1):113-132. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
10
Long-term survival in primary glioblastoma with versus without isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations.原发性胶质母细胞瘤伴与不伴异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变患者的长期生存情况。
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Sep 15;19(18):5146-57. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0017. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical features, MRI, molecular alternations, and prognosis of astrocytoma based on WHO 2021 classification of central nervous system tumors: A single-center retrospective study.基于 2021 年世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类的星形细胞瘤的临床特征、MRI、分子改变和预后:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7369. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7369.
2
Case report: A 53-year-old woman with synchronous WHO classification II and IV gliomas.病例报告:一名53岁女性,患有同步发生的世界卫生组织分类II级和IV级胶质瘤。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 11;14:1308497. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1308497. eCollection 2024.
3
Unusual Extra-Axial and Extracranial Recurrence in an IDH Mutant Astrocytoma: A Case Report.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical utility of targeted next-generation sequencing assay in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma for therapy decision-making.IDH 野生型胶质母细胞瘤中靶向二代测序检测的临床应用对治疗决策的影响。
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;24(7):1140-1149. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab282.
2
The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.2021 年世卫组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类:概述。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
3
Surgical outcome and molecular pattern characterization of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: A single-center retrospective series.
异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变型星形细胞瘤的罕见轴外和颅外复发:一例报告
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023 Dec 4;34(2):351-355. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777012. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in deep learning-based prediction of local recurrence in grade 4 adult-type diffuse gliomas patients.动态对比增强磁共振成像在基于深度学习预测4级成人型弥漫性胶质瘤患者局部复发中的附加价值
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):2171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52841-7.
5
Identifying patients suitable for targeted adjuvant therapy: advances in the field of developing biomarkers for tumor recurrence following irradiation.识别适合靶向辅助治疗的患者:放疗后肿瘤复发生物标志物开发领域的进展。
Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2023;8(1):33-42. doi: 10.1080/23808993.2023.2276927. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
6
Exploring the mechanism of 18F-fluorodopa uptake in recurrent high-grade gliomas: A comprehensive histomolecular-positron emission tomography analysis.探讨复发性高级别胶质瘤中 18F-氟多巴摄取的机制:一项全面的组织分子-正电子发射断层扫描分析。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Jan;31(1):e16093. doi: 10.1111/ene.16093. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
7
Novel insight into histological and molecular astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, Grade 4 by the updated WHO classification of central nervous system tumors.新版中枢神经系统肿瘤世界卫生组织分类对 IDH 突变型星形胶质细胞瘤,4 级的组织学和分子研究的新认识。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):18666-18678. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6476. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
8
Deep learning based on dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging for prediction of local progression in adult-type diffuse glioma (grade 4).基于动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像的深度学习预测成人弥漫性胶质瘤(4 级)的局部进展。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 24;13(1):13864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41171-9.
9
Collagen VI sustains cell stemness and chemotherapy resistance in glioblastoma.胶原 VI 维持胶质母细胞瘤中的细胞干性和化疗耐药性。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2023 Jul 28;80(8):233. doi: 10.1007/s00018-023-04887-5.
复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤的手术结果和分子特征分析:单中心回顾性系列研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;207:106735. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106735. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
Decipher the Glioblastoma Microenvironment: The First Milestone for New Groundbreaking Therapeutic Strategies.解析胶质母细胞瘤微环境:开辟全新治疗策略的第一步。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Mar 20;12(3):445. doi: 10.3390/genes12030445.
5
Current Opinion on Molecular Characterization for GBM Classification in Guiding Clinical Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy.关于胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)分类的分子特征在指导临床诊断、预后和治疗方面的当前观点。
Front Mol Biosci. 2020 Sep 8;7:562798. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.562798. eCollection 2020.
6
Quantitating Interfraction Target Dynamics During Concurrent Chemoradiation for Glioblastoma: A Prospective Serial Imaging Study.胶质母细胞瘤同步放化疗期间分次间靶区动态定量分析:一项前瞻性系列影像学研究
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Mar 1;109(3):736-746. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
Glioma consensus contouring recommendations from a MR-Linac International Consortium Research Group and evaluation of a CT-MRI and MRI-only workflow.磁共振直线加速器国际联合研究组的脑胶质瘤共识勾画推荐意见,以及对 CT-MRI 和 MRI 单一工作流程的评估。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Sep;149(2):305-314. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03605-6. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
8
Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.成人脑胶质母细胞瘤:神经肿瘤学会(SNO)和欧洲神经肿瘤学会(EANO)关于当前管理和未来方向的共识综述。
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Aug 17;22(8):1073-1113. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa106.
9
Impact of volume of irradiation on survival and quality of life in glioblastoma: a prospective, phase 2, randomized comparison of RTOG and MDACC protocols.照射剂量对胶质母细胞瘤患者生存率和生活质量的影响:一项关于RTOG和MDACC方案的前瞻性、2期随机对照研究
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jan;7(1):86-93. doi: 10.1093/nop/npz024. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
Changes of O-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) Promoter Methylation in Glioblastoma Relapse-A Meta-Analysis Type Literature Review.胶质母细胞瘤复发中O-甲基鸟嘌呤DNA甲基转移酶(MGMT)启动子甲基化的变化——一项Meta分析类文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Nov 21;11(12):1837. doi: 10.3390/cancers11121837.