Suppr超能文献

社区参与冲突影响国家卫生系统干预和研究:方法的范围综述。

Community engagement in health systems interventions and research in conflict-affected countries: a scoping review of approaches.

机构信息

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2074131. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2074131.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare research, planning, and delivery with minimal community engagement can result in financial wastage, failure to meet objectives, and frustration in the communities that programmes are designed to help. Engaging communities - individual service-users and user groups - in the planning, delivery, and assessment of healthcare initiatives from inception promotes transparency, accountability, and 'ownership'. Health systems affected by conflict must try to ensure that interventions engage communities and do not exacerbate existing problems. Engaging communities in interventions and research on conflict-affected health systems is essential to begin addressing effects on service delivery and access.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to identify and interrogate the literature on community engagement in health system interventions and research in conflict-affected settings.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review using Arksey & O'Malley's framework, synthesising the data descriptively.

RESULTS

We included 19 of 2,355 potential sources identified. Each discussed at least one aspect of community engagement, predominantly participatory methods, in 12 conflict-affected countries. Major lessons included the importance of engaging community and religious leaders, as well as people of lower socioeconomic status, in both designing and delivering culturally acceptable healthcare; mobilising community members and involving them in programme delivery to increase acceptability; mediating between governments, armed groups and other organisations to increase the ability of healthcare providers to remain in post; giving community members spaces for feedback on healthcare provision, to provide communities with evidence that programmes and initiatives are working.

CONCLUSION

Community engagement in identifying and setting priorities, decision-making, implementing, and evaluating potential solutions helps people share their views and encourages a sense of ownership and increases the likely success of healthcare interventions. However, engaging communities can be particularly difficult in conflict-affected settings, where priorities may not be easy to identify, and many other factors, such as safety, power relations, and entrenched inequalities, must be considered.

摘要

背景

在社区参与度最低的情况下进行医疗保健研究、规划和提供服务,可能会导致财务浪费、无法实现目标以及计划帮助的社区感到沮丧。让社区——包括个体服务用户和用户群体——参与到医疗保健计划的规划、提供和评估中,从一开始就可以促进透明度、问责制和“所有权”。受冲突影响的卫生系统必须努力确保干预措施能够让社区参与其中,并且不会加剧现有的问题。让社区参与到受冲突影响的卫生系统的干预措施和研究中,对于开始解决服务提供和获取方面的影响至关重要。

目的

本综述旨在确定并探讨有关在受冲突影响的环境中进行社区参与卫生系统干预和研究的文献。

方法

我们使用阿特赛和奥马利的框架进行了范围综述,对数据进行了描述性综合。

结果

我们纳入了从 2355 个潜在来源中筛选出的 19 个研究。每个研究都讨论了社区参与的至少一个方面,主要是在 12 个受冲突影响的国家中使用参与性方法。主要的经验教训包括在设计和提供文化上可接受的医疗保健服务时,必须让社区和宗教领袖以及社会经济地位较低的人参与其中;动员社区成员并让他们参与方案的实施,以提高可接受性;在政府、武装团体和其他组织之间进行调解,以增加医疗保健提供者留任的能力;为社区成员提供反馈医疗服务的空间,使社区能够获得方案和举措正在发挥作用的证据。

结论

社区参与确定和设定优先事项、决策、实施和评估潜在解决方案有助于人们分享他们的观点,并鼓励所有权意识,提高医疗保健干预措施的成功可能性。然而,在受冲突影响的环境中,社区参与可能特别困难,因为优先事项可能不容易确定,而且还必须考虑许多其他因素,如安全、权力关系和根深蒂固的不平等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验