Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Dec;32(12):8588-8596. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08939-5. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
To determine the sensitivity of dual-energy (DE) virtual non-contrast computed tomography (vNCT), generated from the excretory phase of a CT urogram, compared to true non-contrast CT (tNCT) for the detection of urinary calculi.
A search of multiple medical literature databases was performed using predetermined search terms. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and bias risk was assessed by two independent reviewers using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool. Collated estimates of sensitivity were generated, and sources of heterogeneity were identified and reviewed.
Thirteen studies (1760 patients; 1740 urinary calculi) were included for sensitivity assessment. Pooled sensitivity for urinary calculi on vNCT was 78.1% (95% CI: 70.2 to 85.0%); however, heterogeneity between studies was very high (I = 92.0%). Sources of heterogeneity between studies were explored through subgroup analysis by categorising studies according to slice thickness (≥ 2 mm and < 2 mm), use of oral hydration, and use of intravenous furosemide. Pooled sensitivity for detection of urinary calculi on vNCT for studies that used oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness was 92.2% (95% CI: 89.5 to 94.5%). Pooled specificity was not performed as true negatives were not reported in most studies. Potential sources of bias were identified in included studies.
vNCT demonstrated a moderate pooled sensitivity compared to tNCT for the detection of urinary calculi in split bolus CT urogram protocols. However, subgroup analysis suggests higher sensitivity when employing oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness or increment.
• vNCT demonstrated moderate pooled sensitivity for the detection of urinary calculi in split bolus CT urogram protocols. • Subgroup analysis suggested higher sensitivity with oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness or increment.
确定排泄期 CT 尿路造影术生成的双能(DE)虚拟非对比 CT(vNCT)检测尿路结石的敏感性与真实非对比 CT(tNCT)相比。
使用预定的搜索词对多个医学文献数据库进行了搜索。应用纳入和排除标准,并使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS)由两名独立的审查员评估偏倚风险。生成汇总的敏感性估计值,并确定和审查异质性来源。
纳入了 13 项研究(1760 名患者;1740 个尿路结石)进行敏感性评估。vNCT 检测尿路结石的汇总敏感性为 78.1%(95%CI:70.2 至 85.0%);然而,研究之间的异质性非常高(I = 92.0%)。通过按切片厚度(≥2mm 和<2mm)、口服水化和静脉注射速尿的分类对研究进行亚组分析,探讨了研究之间异质性的来源。使用口服水化和<2mm 切片厚度的 vNCT 检测尿路结石的汇总敏感性为 92.2%(95%CI:89.5 至 94.5%)。由于大多数研究未报告真阴性,因此未进行汇总特异性。在纳入的研究中确定了潜在的偏倚来源。
与 tNCT 相比,在双能 CT 尿路造影术协议中,vNCT 显示出检测尿路结石的中等汇总敏感性。然而,亚组分析表明,在使用口服水化和<2mm 切片厚度或增量时,敏感性更高。
• vNCT 在双能 CT 尿路造影术协议中检测尿路结石的敏感性中等。• 亚组分析表明,口服水化和<2mm 切片厚度或增量时敏感性更高。