J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct;51(8):102435. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102435. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
This study aimed to compare the educational reliability of laparoscopic hysterectomy videos on YouTube and WebSurg platforms.
We performed an online search with the keyword "laparoscopic hysterectomy" on YouTube and WebSurg. On WebSurg, the surgical interventions in gynecology section were selected. On YouTube, the most relevant surgical videos according to algorithm of YouTube were included. 22 YouTube and 22 WebSurg videos were included in the study. Technical analysis were performed via calculation of ratios such as view/day, like/view, like/subscriber, view/subscriber, and Video Power Index. The videos were evaluated with usefulness and laparoscopic surgery video educational guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) scoring systems.
View/day ratio was higher on YouTube than WebSurg [8.8 (42.1) and 2.5 (5.1), respectively; p = 0.02]. Like/view ratio was lower on YouTube than WebSurg [0.006 (0.01) and 0.01 (0.02), respectively; p = 0.001]. A significant difference was obtained only in the treatment section of usefulness scoring system [0 (0-2), and 0 (0-1) for YouTube and WebSurg, respectively; p = 0.04]. According to LAP-VEGaS, the scores of patient positioning, step-by-step approach, demonstration of intraoperative findings and anatomy, commentary in English parameters were significantly lower on YouTube compared to WebSurg [1(0-2) and 2(2-2), p < 0.001; 2 (0-2) and 2 (2-2), p = 0.004; 2(0-2) and 2(2-2), p < 0.001; 2(0-2) and 2(2-2), p = 0.009, respectively]. The total LAP-VEGaS score of YouTube was lower than WebSurg videos [10(4-16) and 13(10-15), respectively; p = 0.001).
WebSurg was found to be more reliable platform in terms of educational value and quality of laparoscopic hysterectomy videos compared to YouTube.
本研究旨在比较 YouTube 和 WebSurg 平台上腹腔镜子宫切除术视频的教育可靠性。
我们在 YouTube 和 WebSurg 上使用关键词“腹腔镜子宫切除术”进行了在线搜索。在 WebSurg 上，选择了妇科手术干预部分。在 YouTube 上，根据 YouTube 的算法，纳入了最相关的手术视频。研究纳入了 22 个 YouTube 和 22 个 WebSurg 视频。通过计算观看/天、点赞/观看、点赞/订阅者、观看/订阅者和视频动力指数等比率进行技术分析。使用有用性和腹腔镜手术视频教育指南（LAP-VEGaS）评分系统对视频进行评估。
YouTube 上的观看/天比率高于 WebSurg [8.8（42.1）和 2.5（5.1）；p=0.02]。YouTube 上的点赞/观看比率低于 WebSurg [0.006（0.01）和 0.01（0.02）；p=0.001]。仅在有用性评分系统的治疗部分获得了显著差异[YouTube 和 WebSurg 分别为 0（0-2）和 0（0-1）；p=0.04]。根据 LAP-VEGaS，与 WebSurg 相比，YouTube 上患者定位、逐步方法、术中发现和解剖演示、英语参数评论的评分明显较低[1（0-2）和 2（2-2）；p<0.001；2（0-2）和 2（2-2）；p=0.004；2（0-2）和 2（2-2）；p<0.001；2（0-2）和 2（2-2）；p=0.009]。YouTube 的总 LAP-VEGaS 评分低于 WebSurg 视频[10（4-16）和 13（10-15）；p=0.001]。
与 YouTube 相比，WebSurg 在腹腔镜子宫切除术视频的教育价值和质量方面被认为是更可靠的平台。
