INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the educational reliability of laparoscopic hysterectomy videos on YouTube and WebSurg platforms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an online search with the keyword "laparoscopic hysterectomy" on YouTube and WebSurg. On WebSurg, the surgical interventions in gynecology section were selected. On YouTube, the most relevant surgical videos according to algorithm of YouTube were included. 22 YouTube and 22 WebSurg videos were included in the study. Technical analysis were performed via calculation of ratios such as view/day, like/view, like/subscriber, view/subscriber, and Video Power Index. The videos were evaluated with usefulness and laparoscopic surgery video educational guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) scoring systems.

RESULTS

View/day ratio was higher on YouTube than WebSurg [8.8 (42.1) and 2.5 (5.1), respectively; p = 0.02]. Like/view ratio was lower on YouTube than WebSurg [0.006 (0.01) and 0.01 (0.02), respectively; p = 0.001]. A significant difference was obtained only in the treatment section of usefulness scoring system [0 (0-2), and 0 (0-1) for YouTube and WebSurg, respectively; p = 0.04]. According to LAP-VEGaS, the scores of patient positioning, step-by-step approach, demonstration of intraoperative findings and anatomy, commentary in English parameters were significantly lower on YouTube compared to WebSurg [1(0-2) and 2(2-2), p < 0.001; 2 (0-2) and 2 (2-2), p = 0.004; 2(0-2) and 2(2-2), p < 0.001; 2(0-2) and 2(2-2), p = 0.009, respectively]. The total LAP-VEGaS score of YouTube was lower than WebSurg videos [10(4-16) and 13(10-15), respectively; p = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

WebSurg was found to be more reliable platform in terms of educational value and quality of laparoscopic hysterectomy videos compared to YouTube.