• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于腹腔注射 CCl 引起的疼痛反应,对鼠面部表情评分系统进行特定模型简化。

A model-specific simplification of the Mouse Grimace Scale based on the pain response of intraperitoneal CCl injections.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Institute of Imaging and Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 28;12(1):10910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14852-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-14852-0
PMID:35764784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9240072/
Abstract

Despite its long establishment and applicability in mice pain detection, the Mouse Grimace Scale still seems to be underused in acute pain detection during chronic experiments. However, broadening its applicability can identify possible refinement approaches such as cumulative severity and habituation to painful stimuli. Therefore, this study focuses on two main aspects: First, five composite MGS criteria were evaluated with two independent methods (the MoBPs algorithm and a penalized least squares regression) and ranked for their relative importance. The most important variable was used in a second analysis to specifically evaluate the context of pain after an i.p. injection (intervention) in two treatment groups (CCl and oil (control)) at fixed times throughout four weeks in 24 male C57BL/6 N mice. One hour before and after each intervention, video recordings were taken, and the MGS assessment was performed. In this study, the results indicate orbital tightening as the most important criterion. In this experimental setup, a highly significant difference after treatment between week 0 and 1 was found in the CCl group, resulting in a medium-sized effect (W = 62.5, p value < 0.0001, r = 0.64). The oil group showed no significant difference (week 0 vs 1, W = 291.5, p value = 0.7875, r = 0.04). Therefore, the study showed that the pain caused by i.p. injections was only dependent on the applied substance, and no significant cumulation or habituation occurred due to the intervention. Further, the results indicated that the MGS system can be simplified.

摘要

尽管在小鼠疼痛检测中已经长期确立并适用,但在慢性实验中的急性疼痛检测中,老鼠面部表情评分量表似乎仍未得到充分应用。然而,拓宽其适用性可以确定可能的改进方法,例如累积严重程度和对疼痛刺激的习惯化。因此,本研究主要关注两个方面:首先,使用两种独立方法(MoBPs 算法和惩罚最小二乘回归)评估了五个综合 MGS 标准,并对其相对重要性进行了排名。使用最重要的变量进行了第二次分析,专门评估了在 24 只雄性 C57BL/6N 小鼠中,在四周内的四个固定时间点,对腹腔注射(干预)后的疼痛背景进行评估,分为两个治疗组(CCl 和油(对照))。在每次干预前后一个小时,进行视频记录,并进行 MGS 评估。在本研究中,结果表明眼眶收紧是最重要的标准。在这种实验设置中,在 CCl 组中,在治疗后第 0 周和第 1 周之间发现了非常显著的差异,导致中等大小的效应(W=62.5,p 值<0.0001,r=0.64)。油组没有显示出显著差异(第 0 周与第 1 周,W=291.5,p 值=0.7875,r=0.04)。因此,该研究表明,腹腔注射引起的疼痛仅取决于所应用的物质,由于干预,没有明显的累积或习惯化。此外,结果表明 MGS 系统可以简化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/230fc19c556e/41598_2022_14852_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/ccd14d7359fc/41598_2022_14852_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/0c3b9ab87aef/41598_2022_14852_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/39aa2ecd5eb1/41598_2022_14852_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/c36c555c83e1/41598_2022_14852_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/230fc19c556e/41598_2022_14852_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/ccd14d7359fc/41598_2022_14852_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/0c3b9ab87aef/41598_2022_14852_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/39aa2ecd5eb1/41598_2022_14852_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/c36c555c83e1/41598_2022_14852_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/9240072/230fc19c556e/41598_2022_14852_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A model-specific simplification of the Mouse Grimace Scale based on the pain response of intraperitoneal CCl injections.基于腹腔注射 CCl 引起的疼痛反应,对鼠面部表情评分系统进行特定模型简化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 28;12(1):10910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14852-0.
2
Improvement of the Mouse Grimace Scale set-up for implementing a semi-automated Mouse Grimace Scale scoring (Part 1).改良的小鼠面部表情评分系统用于实现半自动的小鼠面部表情评分(第一部分)。
Lab Anim. 2020 Feb;54(1):83-91. doi: 10.1177/0023677219881655. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
3
Facial grimace testing as an assay of neuropathic pain-related behavior in a mouse model of cervical spinal cord injury.面部表情测试作为颈脊髓损伤小鼠模型中神经性疼痛相关行为的检测方法。
Exp Neurol. 2020 Dec;334:113468. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113468. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
4
Semi-automated generation of pictures for the Mouse Grimace Scale: A multi-laboratory analysis (Part 2).半自动化生成老鼠面部表情评分量表图片:多实验室分析(第二部分)。
Lab Anim. 2020 Feb;54(1):92-98. doi: 10.1177/0023677219881664. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
5
Refinement of analgesia following thoracotomy and experimental myocardial infarction using the Mouse Grimace Scale.使用小鼠面部表情量表优化开胸术后和实验性心肌梗死后的镇痛效果。
Exp Physiol. 2015 Feb 1;100(2):164-72. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2014.083139. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
6
Using the mouse grimace scale to assess pain associated with routine ear notching and the effect of analgesia in laboratory mice.使用小鼠面部表情评分法评估实验小鼠常规耳标记相关疼痛及镇痛效果。
Lab Anim. 2015 Apr;49(2):117-20. doi: 10.1177/0023677214559084. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
The assessment of post-vasectomy pain in mice using behaviour and the Mouse Grimace Scale.使用行为和小鼠苦脸量表评估小鼠输精管结扎后的疼痛。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035656. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
8
The effect of handling method on the mouse grimace scale in two strains of laboratory mice.处理方法对两种品系实验小鼠的小鼠面部表情评分量表的影响。
Lab Anim. 2016 Aug;50(4):305-7. doi: 10.1177/0023677215622144. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
9
Development of PainFace software to simplify, standardize, and scale up mouse grimace analyses.开发PainFace软件以简化、规范和扩大小鼠痛苦表情分析。
Pain. 2024 Aug 1;165(8):1793-1805. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003187. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10
Development and validation of a cynomolgus macaque grimace scale for acute pain assessment.食蟹猴急性疼痛评估 grimace 量表的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 24;13(1):3209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30380-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The grimace scale: a useful tool for assessing pain in laboratory animals.面部表情评分法:一种评估实验室动物疼痛的有用工具。
Exp Anim. 2024 Jul 9;73(3):234-245. doi: 10.1538/expanim.24-0010. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
Grimace scale assessment during inflammation and colitis development in laboratory mice.实验室小鼠炎症和结肠炎发展过程中的面部表情评分评估
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 5;10:1173446. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1173446. eCollection 2023.
3
Grimace scale, burrowing, and nest building for the assessment of post-surgical pain in mice and rats-A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Best variable identification by means of data-mining and cooperative game theory.基于数据挖掘和合作博弈理论的最佳变量识别。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103625. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103625. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Severity assessment in mice subjected to carbon tetrachloride.四氯化碳处理小鼠的严重程度评估。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 25;10(1):15790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72801-1.
3
Grimace Scores: Tools to Support the Identification of Pain in Mammals Used in Research.鬼脸评分:用于支持识别研究中所用哺乳动物疼痛的工具。
用于评估小鼠和大鼠术后疼痛的面部表情评分、打洞行为和筑巢行为——一项系统评价
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 6;9:930005. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.930005. eCollection 2022.
4
The neurobiology of pain and facial movements in rodents: Clinical applications and current research.啮齿动物疼痛与面部运动的神经生物学:临床应用与当前研究
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Sep 29;9:1016720. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1016720. eCollection 2022.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 23;10(10):1726. doi: 10.3390/ani10101726.
4
Reliability of the Mouse Grimace Scale in C57BL/6JRj Mice.C57BL/6JRj小鼠面部表情疼痛量表的可靠性
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 14;10(9):1648. doi: 10.3390/ani10091648.
5
The development and use of facial grimace scales for pain measurement in animals.用于动物疼痛测量的面部表情量表的开发与应用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Sep;116:480-493. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Inter-Rater Reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale in Cats Undergoing Dental Extractions.猫牙科拔牙术中猫面部表情量表的评分者间信度
Front Vet Sci. 2020 May 29;7:302. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00302. eCollection 2020.
7
Towards a fully automated surveillance of well-being status in laboratory mice using deep learning: Starting with facial expression analysis.利用深度学习实现实验室小鼠全面自动化健康监测:从面部表情分析开始。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0228059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228059. eCollection 2020.
8
Semi-automated generation of pictures for the Mouse Grimace Scale: A multi-laboratory analysis (Part 2).半自动化生成老鼠面部表情评分量表图片:多实验室分析(第二部分)。
Lab Anim. 2020 Feb;54(1):92-98. doi: 10.1177/0023677219881664. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
9
Improvement of the Mouse Grimace Scale set-up for implementing a semi-automated Mouse Grimace Scale scoring (Part 1).改良的小鼠面部表情评分系统用于实现半自动的小鼠面部表情评分(第一部分)。
Lab Anim. 2020 Feb;54(1):83-91. doi: 10.1177/0023677219881655. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier.疼痛表情评分能否评估马和鼠的疼痛状态?一种识别分类器的统计学方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0200339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200339. eCollection 2018.