• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于数据挖掘和合作博弈理论的最佳变量识别。

Best variable identification by means of data-mining and cooperative game theory.

机构信息

Institute for Laboratory Animal Science & Experimental Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Faculty of Medicine, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103625. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103625. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103625
PMID:33221467
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate methods to assess single and grouped variables impact on measuring intervention severities and support a search for most expressive variables.

METHODS

Datasets of cohort studies are analyzed automatically based on algorithms. For this, a metric is developed to compare measured variables in different cohorts in a data-mining process. Variables are measured in all possible combinations to detect possible synergies of certain variable constellations and allow for a ranking of the combinations' expressiveness. Such ranking serves as a basis for a wide range of algorithmic data analysis. In an exemplary application, every group member's impact on the total result is determined based on the principle of the cooperative game theory besides to the total expressiveness of the variable groups.

RESULTS

For different types of interventions, the method is applied to experimental data containing multiple recorded medical lab values. The expressiveness of variable combinations to indicate severity is ranked by means of a metric. Within each combination, any variable's contribution to the total effect is determined and accumulated over whole datasets to yield local and global variable importance measures. The computed results have been successfully matched with clinical expectations to prove their plausibility.

CONCLUSION

Algorithmic evaluation shows to be a promising approach in automatized quantification of variable expressiveness. It can assess descriptive power of measurements, help to improve future study designs and expose worthwhile research issues.

摘要

目的

开发和评估方法,以评估单一和分组变量对测量干预严重程度的影响,并支持寻找最具表达力的变量。

方法

基于算法自动分析队列研究数据集。为此,开发了一种度量标准,用于在数据挖掘过程中比较不同队列中测量的变量。以所有可能的组合来测量变量,以检测某些变量组合的可能协同作用,并对组合的表达能力进行排序。这种排序为广泛的算法数据分析提供了基础。在一个示例应用中,根据合作博弈理论的原理,除了变量组的总表达能力外,还确定了每个组内成员对总结果的影响。

结果

针对不同类型的干预,该方法应用于包含多个记录的医学实验室值的实验数据。通过度量标准对指示严重程度的变量组合的表达能力进行排序。在每个组合中,确定任何变量对总效果的贡献,并在整个数据集上进行累积,以得出局部和全局变量重要性度量。计算结果与临床预期相匹配,证明了其合理性。

结论

算法评估被证明是一种很有前途的自动量化变量表达能力的方法。它可以评估测量的描述能力,有助于改进未来的研究设计,并揭示有价值的研究问题。

相似文献

1
Best variable identification by means of data-mining and cooperative game theory.基于数据挖掘和合作博弈理论的最佳变量识别。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103625. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103625. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
A multicenter random forest model for effective prognosis prediction in collaborative clinical research network.多中心随机森林模型在协作临床研究网络中的有效预后预测。
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Mar;103:101814. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101814. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
3
Feature selection with neighborhood entropy-based cooperative game theory.基于邻域熵的合作博弈理论的特征选择
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2014;2014:479289. doi: 10.1155/2014/479289. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
4
Game theoretic centrality: a novel approach to prioritize disease candidate genes by combining biological networks with the Shapley value.博弈论中心性:一种将生物网络与 Shapley 值相结合以优先考虑疾病候选基因的新方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Aug 12;21(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03693-1.
5
Discovering metric temporal constraint networks on temporal databases.发现时态数据库上的度量时态约束网络。
Artif Intell Med. 2013 Jul;58(3):139-54. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 May 6.
6
On the Shapley Value of Unrooted Phylogenetic Trees.无根系统发生树的 Shapley 值。
Bull Math Biol. 2019 Feb;81(2):618-638. doi: 10.1007/s11538-018-0392-8. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
7
Coalitional game theory as a promising approach to identify candidate autism genes.联盟博弈论作为一种识别孤独症候选基因的有前景的方法。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2018;23:436-447.
8
Detection of medications associated with Alzheimer's disease using ensemble methods and cooperative game theory.使用集成方法和合作博弈论检测与阿尔茨海默病相关的药物。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104142. Epub 2020 May 24.
9
Banzhaf random forests: Cooperative game theory based random forests with consistency.班扎夫随机森林:基于一致性的合作博弈论随机森林
Neural Netw. 2018 Oct;106:20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Improving structural medical process comparison by exploiting domain knowledge and mined information.利用领域知识和挖掘的信息改进结构医学过程比较。
Artif Intell Med. 2014 Sep;62(1):33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of different machine learning approaches in prediction of breast cancer diagnosis delay.不同机器学习方法在乳腺癌诊断延迟预测中的应用
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 16;13:1103369. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1103369. eCollection 2023.
2
Robustness of a multivariate composite score when evaluating distress of animal models for gastrointestinal diseases.评估胃肠道疾病动物模型的痛苦时,多元复合评分的稳健性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 14;13(1):2605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29623-8.
3
A model-specific simplification of the Mouse Grimace Scale based on the pain response of intraperitoneal CCl injections.
基于腹腔注射 CCl 引起的疼痛反应,对鼠面部表情评分系统进行特定模型简化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 28;12(1):10910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14852-0.