Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands/Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Mult Scler. 2022 Nov;28(13):2124-2136. doi: 10.1177/13524585221103134. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness.
To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive training.
Eighty-two PwMS were randomized into a 7-week attention training ( = 58, age = 48.4 ± 10.2 years) or a waiting-list control group ( = 24, age = 48.5 ± 9.4 years). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at baseline and post-intervention. Twenty-one healthy controls (HCs, age = 50.27 ± 10.15 years) were included at baseline. Responders were defined with a reliable change index of 1.64 on at least 2/6 cognitive domains. General linear models and logistic regression were applied.
Responders ( = 36) and non-responders ( = 22) did not differ on demographics, clinical variables and baseline cognition and structural MRI. However, non-responders exhibited a higher baseline functional connectivity (FC) between the default-mode network (DMN) and the ventral attention network (VAN), compared with responders ( = 0.018) and HCs ( = 0.001). Conversely, responders exhibited no significant baseline differences in FC compared with HCs. Response to cognitive training was predicted by lower DMN-VAN FC ( = 0.004) and DMN-frontoparietal FC ( = 0.029) (Nagelkerke = 0.25).
An intact pre-intervention FC is associated with cognitive training responsivity in pwMS, suggesting a window of opportunity for successful cognitive interventions.
认知训练可轻度至中度改善多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)的认知功能,但反应异质性限制了整体效果。
确定与认知训练反应和无反应相关的患者特征。
82 名 PwMS 被随机分为 7 周注意力训练组( = 58 名,年龄 = 48.4 ± 10.2 岁)或等待名单对照组( = 24 名,年龄 = 48.5 ± 9.4 岁)。在基线和干预后进行结构和功能磁共振成像(MRI)检查。21 名健康对照组(HCs,年龄 = 50.27 ± 10.15 岁)在基线时纳入。定义反应者在至少 2/6 个认知域上的可靠变化指数为 1.64。应用一般线性模型和逻辑回归。
反应者( = 36)和无反应者( = 22)在人口统计学、临床变量和基线认知及结构 MRI 方面无差异。然而,与反应者( = 0.018)和 HCs( = 0.001)相比,无反应者在默认模式网络(DMN)和腹侧注意网络(VAN)之间的基线功能连接(FC)更高( = 0.018)。相反,与 HCs 相比,反应者在基线 FC 上没有显著差异。认知训练的反应由较低的 DMN-VAN FC( = 0.004)和 DMN-额顶叶 FC( = 0.029)预测(Nagelkerke = 0.25)。
干预前 FC 的完整性与 pwMS 认知训练的反应性相关,表明成功认知干预的机会窗口。