• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未被承认和遗漏的性受害案例:对广泛问题与行为具体问题的反应比较。

Unacknowledged and missed cases of sexual victimization: A comparison of responses to broad versus behaviorally specific questions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Department of Education and Psychology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2022 Nov;48(6):573-582. doi: 10.1002/ab.22043. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1002/ab.22043
PMID:35766528
Abstract

From the beginning of systematic research on sexual victimization, it has been recognized that a substantial proportion of women report nonconsensual sexual experiences meeting the defining criteria of rape in response to behaviorally specific items, but do not acknowledge their experience as rape in response to broad questions about whether they have ever been raped. Recent studies suggest that rates of unacknowledged rape may be as high or even higher among men than among women. This study examined rates of unacknowledged female and male victims of rape and sexual assault by comparing responses to behaviorally specific items of the Sexual Aggression and Victimization Scale (SAV-S) with responses to broad questions using the labels of sexual assault and rape (SARA) in 593 participants (303 women) in Germany. As predicted, more women and men were classified as rape victims based on behaviorally specific items than on the basis of the broad rape item. The rates of unacknowledged rape were about 60% for women and 75% for men. The gender difference was not significant. Against our prediction, no significant differences in acknowledgement of sexual assault were found in relation to coercive strategy and victim-perpetrator relationship. Few cases of rape and sexual assault identified by the SARA items were missed by the behaviorally specific questions. The implications for establishing prevalence rates of rape and sexual assault and for comparing victims and nonvictims in terms of vulnerability factors and outcomes of sexual victimization are discussed.

摘要

从性侵犯的系统研究开始,人们就已经认识到,相当一部分女性在针对具体行为的项目中报告了非自愿的性行为,这些性行为符合强奸的定义标准,但在回答关于她们是否曾经被强奸的广泛问题时,并不承认自己的经历是强奸。最近的研究表明,未被承认的男性强奸的比例可能与女性一样高,甚至更高。本研究通过比较性行为特定项目与使用性侵犯和强奸标签的广泛问题的反应,比较了德国 593 名参与者(303 名女性)中未被承认的女性和男性强奸和性侵犯受害者的比例(SAV-S)。正如所预测的,更多的女性和男性根据具体行为项目而不是基于广泛的强奸项目被归类为强奸受害者。未被承认的强奸率约为女性的 60%,男性的 75%。性别差异不显著。与我们的预测相反,在强制策略和受害者-施害者关系方面,对性侵犯的承认没有显著差异。通过 SARA 项目确定的少数强奸和性侵犯案件被具体行为问题遗漏了。本研究结果对确定强奸和性侵犯的流行率以及根据易受伤害因素和性侵犯后果来比较受害者和非受害者具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Unacknowledged and missed cases of sexual victimization: A comparison of responses to broad versus behaviorally specific questions.未被承认和遗漏的性受害案例:对广泛问题与行为具体问题的反应比较。
Aggress Behav. 2022 Nov;48(6):573-582. doi: 10.1002/ab.22043. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011.性暴力、跟踪和亲密伴侣暴力受害的流行率和特征——2011 年美国全国亲密伴侣和性暴力调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Sep 5;63(8):1-18.
3
Sexual victimization experience, acknowledgment labeling and rape empathy among college men and women.大学生男女的性侵害经历、认知标签与强奸同理心
J Am Coll Health. 2025 Feb;73(2):446-449. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2220410. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
4
How Men's Sexual Assault Victimization Experiences Differ Based on Their Sexual History.男性性侵犯受害经历如何因性史而异。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Jul;35(13-14):2624-2633. doi: 10.1177/0886260517703374. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
5
Responding to Disclosure of Sexual Assault: The Potential Impact of Victimization History and Rape Myth Acceptance.回应性侵犯披露:受害者史和强奸神话接受的潜在影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):2102-2125. doi: 10.1177/0886260519898429. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
6
Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States.性侵犯支持态度:美国两所大学的希腊裔和非希腊裔大学生中的强奸谬论接受和象征性抵制。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Nov;33(22):3502-3530. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636064. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
Acknowledged versus unacknowledged sexual assault among college women.高校女性中被承认和未被承认的性侵犯。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Aug;28(12):2593-611. doi: 10.1177/0886260513479033. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Rape Acknowledgment and Sexual Minority Women's Mental Health and Drinking Behaviors.强奸认知与性少数女性的心理健康和饮酒行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Apr;36(7-8):NP3786-NP3802. doi: 10.1177/0886260518781800. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
"'I am a Man. How Could I Possibly Have Been Raped?' Men Making Sense of Their Experiences With Sexual Violence".“‘我是个男人,怎么可能被强奸?’ 男性对性暴力经历的认知”。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):10514-10541. doi: 10.1177/08862605231174500. Epub 2023 May 24.
10
Sexual Violence Victimization of U.S. Males: Negative Health Conditions Associated with Rape and Being Made to Penetrate.美国男性的性暴力受害:强奸和被强迫插入相关的负面健康状况。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP20953-NP20971. doi: 10.1177/08862605211055151. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Force, Incapacitation, or Verbal Coercion: Rates and Outcomes of Sexual Assault without Warning.超越暴力、 incapacitation 或言语胁迫:无预警性侵犯的发生率及后果 。 (注:这里“incapacitation”在医学或法律语境中有“使无行为能力”等意思,结合语境可能是指通过药物等手段使受害者失去反抗能力等情况,可根据具体领域进一步准确理解和表述。)
J Sex Res. 2024 Sep 19:1-10. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2403019.
2
Scripts for consensual sex as risk factors for sexual aggression: A three-wave longitudinal study with university students in Germany.同意性行为脚本作为性侵犯风险因素:一项对德国大学生的三波纵向研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231213269. doi: 10.1177/17455057231213269.
3
Pathways from childhood sexual abuse to sexual aggression victimization and perpetration in adolescence and young adulthood: a three-wave longitudinal study.
从儿童期性虐待到青少年和青年期性侵犯受害和加害的途径:一项三波纵向研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2263321. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2263321. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
Measuring sexual violence perpetration acknowledgment: Testing the effects of label and response format.衡量性暴力行为承认度:检验标签和反应格式的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2023 Sep;49(5):499-508. doi: 10.1002/ab.22086. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
5
#StudentsToo. prevalence of sexual assault reports among students of three European universities and their actions post-assault.#学生也是受害者#:三所欧洲大学学生中性侵犯报告的流行情况及其性侵犯后的行为。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0283554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283554. eCollection 2023.