• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习算法在预测初次髋膝关节置换术后患者报告结局指标方面的效用。

The utility of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of patient-reported outcome measures following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty.

作者信息

Klemt Christian, Uzosike Akachimere Cosmas, Esposito John G, Harvey Michael Joseph, Yeo Ingwon, Subih Murad, Kwon Young-Min

机构信息

Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2235-2245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04526-x. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-022-04526-x
PMID:35767040
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used as quality benchmark in total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA; TKA) due to bundled payment systems that aim to provide a patient-centered, value-based treatment approach. However, there is a paucity of predictive tools for postoperative PROMs. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for the prediction of numerous patient-reported outcome measures following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 4526 consecutive patients (2137 THA; 2389 TKA) who underwent primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty and completed both pre- and postoperative PROM scores was evaluated in this study. The following PROM scores were included for analysis: HOOS-PS, KOOS-PS, Physical Function SF10A, PROMIS SF Physical and PROMIS SF Mental. Patient charts were manually reviewed to identify patient demographics and surgical variables associated with postoperative PROM scores. Four machine learning algorithms were developed to predict postoperative PROMs following hip and knee total joint arthroplasty. Model assessment was performed through discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The factors most significantly associated with the prediction of postoperative PROMs include preoperative PROM scores, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anaesthesiology score, insurance status, age, length of hospital stay, body mass index and ethnicity. The four machine learning models all achieved excellent performance across discrimination (AUC > 0.83), calibration and decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study developed machine learning models for the prediction of patient-reported outcome measures at 1-year following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty. The study findings show excellent performance on discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis for all four machine learning models, highlighting the potential of these models in clinical practice to inform patients prior to surgery regarding their expectations of postoperative functional outcomes following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case control retrospective analysis.

摘要

背景

由于旨在提供以患者为中心、基于价值的治疗方法的捆绑支付系统,患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)在全髋关节和膝关节置换术(THA;TKA)中越来越多地被用作质量基准。然而,术后PROMs的预测工具匮乏。因此,本研究旨在开发并验证机器学习模型,以预测初次髋膝关节全关节置换术后多种患者报告结局测量指标。

方法

本研究评估了4526例连续接受初次髋膝关节全关节置换术并完成术前和术后PROM评分的患者(2137例THA;2389例TKA)。纳入分析的PROM评分如下:HOOS-PS、KOOS-PS、身体功能SF10A、PROMIS SF身体和PROMIS SF心理。人工查阅患者病历,以确定与术后PROM评分相关的患者人口统计学和手术变量。开发了四种机器学习算法,以预测髋膝关节全关节置换术后的PROMs。通过区分度、校准和决策曲线分析进行模型评估。

结果

与术后PROMs预测最显著相关的因素包括术前PROM评分、Charlson合并症指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分、保险状况、年龄、住院时间、体重指数和种族。这四种机器学习模型在区分度(AUC>0.83)、校准和决策曲线分析方面均表现出色。

结论

本研究开发了机器学习模型,用于预测初次髋膝关节全关节置换术后1年的患者报告结局测量指标。研究结果显示,所有四种机器学习模型在区分度、校准和决策曲线分析方面均表现出色,突出了这些模型在临床实践中的潜力,可为患者在手术前提供有关初次髋膝关节全关节置换术后功能结局预期的信息。

证据水平

III级,病例对照回顾性分析。

相似文献

1
The utility of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of patient-reported outcome measures following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty.机器学习算法在预测初次髋膝关节置换术后患者报告结局指标方面的效用。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2235-2245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04526-x. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?国际髋关节和膝关节置换登记处的患者报告结局评分如何比较?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1884-1896. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002306. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
3
Development of machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of minimal clinically important difference for the KOOS-PS following total knee arthroplasty.开发机器学习算法以预测全膝关节置换术后膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分-身体功能(KOOS-PS)达到最小临床重要差异的情况。
J Orthop Res. 2022 Apr;40(4):808-815. doi: 10.1002/jor.25125. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
4
Can Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Which Patients Will Achieve Minimally Clinically Important Differences From Total Joint Arthroplasty?机器学习算法能否预测哪些患者将从全关节置换术中获得最小临床重要差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1267-1279. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000687.
5
Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.比较在退伍军人事务部医院接受择期全髋关节或全膝关节置换术的退伍军人患者报告的结局测量中确定最小临床重要差异的方法。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):404-411. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024.
6
Can machine learning models predict failure of revision total hip arthroplasty?机器学习模型能否预测全髋关节翻修术失败?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):2805-2812. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04453-x. Epub 2022 May 4.
7
Poor Patient Compliance Limits the Attainability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Completion Thresholds for the Comprehensive Care for Joint Arthroplasty Model.较差的患者依从性限制了综合关节置换模型患者报告结局测量完成门槛的可实现性。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S63-S68. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.09.026. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
8
Machine learning algorithms predict extended postoperative opioid use in primary total knee arthroplasty.机器学习算法预测原发性全膝关节置换术后延长的术后阿片类药物使用。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2573-2581. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06812-4. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
9
The utilization of artificial neural networks for the prediction of 90-day unplanned readmissions following total knee arthroplasty.利用人工神经网络预测全膝关节置换术后 90 天内的非计划性再入院。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3279-3289. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04566-3. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
10
Changes in Patient Reported Outcome Measure Scores From Initial Presentation to Day-of-Surgery in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.髋关节和膝关节置换术后患者从初次就诊到手术当天的患者报告结局测量评分变化。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec;37(12):2340-2346. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.046. Epub 2022 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after hip and knee replacement surgery: study protocol for a comparison of modelling approaches using the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS).预测髋关节和膝关节置换术后患者的预后及翻修手术风险:一项使用瑞士国家关节登记处(SIRIS)比较建模方法的研究方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2025 Aug 4;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41512-025-00200-z.
2
Bioethical Considerations of Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Orthopedic Settings: A Narrative Review.在临床骨科环境中部署人工智能的生物伦理考量:一项叙述性综述。
HSS J. 2025 May 30:15563316251340303. doi: 10.1177/15563316251340303.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting surgical operative time in primary total knee arthroplasty utilizing machine learning models.利用机器学习模型预测初次全膝关节置换术的手术操作时间。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3299-3307. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04588-x. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
Adductor Canal Block Does not Confer Better Immediate Postoperative Pain Relief after Total Knee Arthroplasty.股神经阻滞在全膝关节置换术后并不能提供更好的即时术后疼痛缓解。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Jul;36(8):843-848. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743495. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
3
Artificial Neural Networks Can Predict Early Failure of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Osteoporosis.
Using artificial intelligence to predict patient outcomes from patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review.
利用人工智能根据患者报告的结局指标预测患者预后:一项范围综述
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 11;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02365-z.
4
Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.预测患者报告的结局指标:人工智能引导的患者偏好预测器的范围综述
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 5;7:1477447. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447. eCollection 2024.
5
Reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures in assessing knee osteoarthritis in the Chinese population: A systematic review.患者报告结局指标在中国人群中评估膝骨关节炎的信度和效度:一项系统评价
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 2;10(18):e36645. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36645. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
6
Optimal inputs for machine learning models in predicting total joint arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review.预测全关节置换术结果的机器学习模型的最佳输入:系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):3809-3825. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04076-5. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
7
Predicting Functional Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.使用机器学习预测全髋关节置换术的功能结果:一项系统综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 21;13(2):603. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020603.
8
On the Horizon: Specific Applications of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology.展望未来:自动化与人工智能在麻醉学中的具体应用
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2023 Jun;13(2):31-40. doi: 10.1007/s40140-023-00558-0. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
9
The Joint Awareness Score: A Shortened, Simplified, Improved Alternative to the Forgotten Joint Score.关节意识评分:一种对被遗忘的关节评分进行简化、改进的替代方法。
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Oct 27;24:101239. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101239. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Assessment in Rotator Cuff Pathologies: A Clinical Data-Based Approach.机器学习算法在肩袖损伤病理预后评估中的应用:基于临床数据的方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 11;13(18):2915. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182915.
人工神经网络可预测骨质疏松症患者非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术的早期失败。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 May 15;30(10):467-475. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00775. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
The Ability of Deep Learning Models to Identify Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Implant Design From Plain Radiographs.深度学习模型从普通X线片识别全髋关节和膝关节置换植入物设计的能力。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 May 1;30(9):409-415. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00771. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Probing intracellular vesicle trafficking and membrane remodelling by cryo-EM.通过冷冻电镜研究细胞内囊泡运输和膜重塑。
J Struct Biol. 2022 Mar;214(1):107836. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2022.107836. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Artificial intelligence algorithms accurately predict prolonged length of stay following revision total knee arthroplasty.人工智能算法能准确预测全膝关节翻修术后的住院时间延长。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2556-2564. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06894-8. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use on Patient-Reported Outcomes after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Matched Analysis.术前使用阿片类药物对翻修全膝关节置换术后患者报告结局的影响:一项倾向匹配分析。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(2):115-120. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729966. Epub 2021 May 15.
8
Minority Race and Ethnicity is Associated With Higher Complication Rates After Revision Surgery for Failed Total Hip and Knee Joint Arthroplasty.少数族裔与全髋关节和膝关节置换失败翻修术后较高的并发症发生率相关。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Apr;36(4):1393-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.043. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
9
An Evaluation of Risk Factors for Patient "No Shows" at an Urban Joint Arthroplasty Clinic.城市关节置换诊所患者“失约”的风险因素评估。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Nov 15;28(22):e1006-e1013. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00550.
10
Single-Stage Revision of the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Improved Functional Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.感染性全膝关节置换术的单阶段翻修与功能结局改善相关:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 22.