School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2219217. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19217.
The continued harm of Black individuals in the US by law enforcement officers calls for reform of both law enforcement officers and structural racism embedded in communities.
To examine the association between county characteristics and racial and ethnic disparities in legal intervention injuries.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among 27 671 patients presenting to California hospitals from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, with legal intervention injuries (defined as any injury sustained as a result of an encounter with any law enforcement officer) as identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes.
Legal intervention injuries were classified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision external cause of injury code Y35. Expected injury counts were calculated for each county by multiplying statewide median rates of injury per capita for each age-racial and ethnic group, and then observed to expected injury ratios were measured. The association between county injury ratio, percentage of Black individuals, and residential segregation (measured using an index of dissimilarity) was modeled, stratifying by race and ethnicity.
A total of 27 671 patients (24 159 male patients [87.3%]; 1734 Asian and Pacific Islander [6.3%], 5049 Black [18.2%], 11 250 Hispanic [40.7%], and 9638 White [34.8%]; mean [SD] age, 34.2 [12.5] years) presented with legal intervention injuries in California from 2016 to 2019. Observed to expected injury ratios ranged from 0 to 7 for Black residents and from 0 to 5 for White residents. High observed to expected injury ratios for Black residents (408 observed vs 60 expected; ratio = 7) were clustered around San Francisco Bay Area counties and corresponded with a higher proportion of Black residents. High observed to expected injury ratios for White residents (57 observed vs 11 expected; ratio = 5) clustered around rural northern California counties and corresponded with higher mean percentage of residents with income below the federal poverty level and fewer urban areas.
This study suggests that residential segregation may be associated with increased legal intervention injury rates for Black residents of California counties with a large percentage of Black residents. Reform efforts to address racial and ethnic disparities in these injuries should carefully consider and address the legacy of discriminatory policies that has led to segregated communities in California and the United States.
美国执法人员对黑人的持续伤害要求对执法人员和社区中根深蒂固的结构性种族主义进行改革。
研究县特征与法律干预伤害中的种族和民族差异之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性、横断面研究,共纳入 27671 名 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间因法律干预受伤(定义为与任何执法人员发生任何冲突导致的任何伤害)到加利福尼亚州医院就诊的患者,这些受伤通过国际疾病分类第十版外部原因伤害代码 Y35 识别。
法律干预伤害按国际疾病分类第十版外部原因伤害代码 Y35 进行分类。根据每个年龄段的全州人均伤害率,为每个县计算预期的伤害人数,然后测量观察到的预期伤害比率。通过分层分析种族和民族,对县伤害比率、黑人比例和居住隔离(用不相似性指数衡量)之间的关联进行建模。
共有 27671 名患者(24159 名男性患者[87.3%];1734 名亚裔和太平洋岛民[6.3%],5049 名黑人[18.2%],11250 名西班牙裔[40.7%],9638 名白人[34.8%];平均[标准差]年龄为 34.2[12.5]岁)在加利福尼亚州因法律干预受伤。观察到的预期伤害比率范围为黑人居民的 0 到 7,白人居民的 0 到 5。黑人居民观察到的高预期伤害比(408 比 60;比率=7)集中在旧金山湾区各县,与黑人居民比例较高相对应。白人居民观察到的高预期伤害比(57 比 11;比率=5)集中在北加州农村县,与收入低于联邦贫困线的居民比例较高和城市地区较少相对应。
这项研究表明,居住隔离可能与加利福尼亚县黑人居民的法律干预伤害率增加有关,这些县的黑人居民比例较大。解决这些伤害中的种族和民族差异的改革努力应仔细考虑和解决导致加利福尼亚州和美国社区隔离的歧视性政策的遗留问题。