Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Institute for Informatics, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e234172. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4172.
Residential segregation has been shown to be a root cause of racial inequities in health outcomes, yet little is known about current patterns of racial segregation in where patients receive hospital care or whether hospital segregation is associated with health outcomes. Filling this knowledge gap is critical to implementing policies that improve racial equity in health care.
To characterize contemporary patterns of racial segregation in hospital care delivery, identify market-level correlates, and determine the association between hospital segregation and health outcomes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of US hospital referral regions (HRRs) used 2018 Medicare claims, American Community Survey, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Social Determinants of Health data. Hospitalization patterns for all non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with at least 1 inpatient hospitalization in an eligible hospital were evaluated for hospital segregation and associated health outcomes at the HRR level. The data analysis was performed between August 10, 2022, and September 6, 2023.
Dissimilarity index and isolation index for HRRs.
Health outcomes were measured using Prevention Quality Indicator (PQI) acute and chronic composites per 100 000 Medicare beneficiaries, and total deaths related to heart disease and stroke per 100 000 residents were calculated for individuals aged 74 years or younger. Correlation coefficients were used to compare residential and hospital dissimilarity and residential and hospital isolation. Linear regression was used to examine the association between hospital segregation and health outcomes.
This study included 280 HRRs containing data for 4386 short-term acute care and critical access hospitals. Black and White patients tended to receive care at different hospitals, with a mean (SD) dissimilarity index of 23 (11) and mean (SD) isolation index of 13 (13), indicating substantial variation in segregation across HRRs. Hospital segregation was correlated with residential segregation (correlation coefficients, 0.58 and 0.90 for dissimilarity and isolation, respectively). For Black patients, a 1-SD increase in the hospital isolation index was associated with 204 (95% CI, 154-254) more acute PQI hospitalizations per 100 000 Medicare beneficiaries (28% increase from the median), 684 (95% CI, 488-880) more chronic PQI hospitalizations per 100 000 Medicare beneficiaries (15% increase), and 6 (95% CI, 2-9) additional deaths per 100 000 residents (6% increase) compared with 68 (95% CI, 24-113; 6% increase), 202 (95% CI, 131-274; 8% increase), and 2 (95% CI, 0 to 4; 3% increase), respectively, for White patients.
This cross-sectional study found that higher segregation of hospital care was associated with poorer health outcomes for both Black and White Medicare beneficiaries, with significantly greater negative health outcomes for Black populations, supporting racial segregation as a root cause of health disparities. Policymakers and clinical leaders could address this important public health issue through payment reform efforts and expansion of health insurance coverage, in addition to supporting upstream efforts to reduce racial segregation in hospital care and residential settings.
重要性:已有研究表明,居住隔离是导致健康结果存在种族差异的根本原因,但目前对于患者接受医院护理的地点的种族隔离模式,以及医院隔离是否与健康结果相关,我们知之甚少。填补这一知识空白对于实施改善医疗保健中种族公平的政策至关重要。
目的:描述医院护理提供中当代的种族隔离模式,确定其市场相关因素,并确定医院隔离与健康结果之间的关系。
设计、设置和参与者:这项在美国医院转诊区(HRR)开展的横断面研究使用了 2018 年医疗保险索赔、美国社区调查和医疗保健研究与质量社会决定因素数据。评估了所有非西班牙裔黑人或非西班牙裔白人医疗保险按服务项目付费受益人的住院模式,这些人在符合条件的医院至少有一次住院治疗,以评估 HRR 层面的医院隔离及其相关健康结果。数据分析于 2022 年 8 月 10 日至 2023 年 9 月 6 日进行。
暴露:HRR 的不相似指数和隔离指数。
主要结果和措施:使用每 10 万医疗保险受益人的预防质量指标(PQI)急性和慢性综合指标来衡量健康结果,并为 74 岁或以下的个体计算与心脏病和中风相关的总死亡人数。使用相关系数比较居住和医院的不相似性,以及居住和医院的隔离性。使用线性回归来检验医院隔离与健康结果之间的关系。
结果:这项研究包含了 280 个 HRR,其中包含了 4386 家短期急性护理和关键通道医院的数据。黑人和白人患者往往在不同的医院接受治疗,不相似指数的平均值(SD)为 23(11),隔离指数的平均值(SD)为 13(13),表明 HRR 之间的隔离程度存在很大差异。医院隔离与居住隔离呈正相关(相关系数分别为 0.58 和 0.90)。对于黑人患者,医院隔离指数每增加 1 个标准差,每 10 万医疗保险受益人中急性 PQI 住院人数就会增加 204(95%CI,154-254),慢性 PQI 住院人数增加 684(95%CI,488-880),每 10 万居民中与心脏病和中风相关的死亡人数增加 6(95%CI,2-9),而白人患者分别增加 68(95%CI,24-113;增加 6%)、202(95%CI,131-274;增加 8%)和 2(95%CI,0 至 4;增加 3%)。
结论和相关性:这项横断面研究发现,医院护理的隔离程度越高,黑人和白人医疗保险受益人的健康结果越差,黑人人口的健康结果显著恶化,这支持了种族隔离是健康差异的根本原因。政策制定者和临床领导者可以通过支付改革努力和扩大医疗保险覆盖范围来解决这一重要的公共卫生问题,此外还可以支持减少医院护理和居住环境中种族隔离的上游工作。