Jensen Katherine, Yan Qi, Davies Mark G
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Jun 29;8(2):e35074. doi: 10.2196/35074.
With the move to virtual interviewing, residency websites are an important recruitment resource, introducing applicants to programs across the country and allowing for comparison. Recruitment is highly competitive from a common potential pool between vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, and interventional radiology with the ratio of applicants to positions being highest in interventional radiology, followed by thoracic surgery and lastly vascular surgery, as reported by the National Resident Matching Program.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the accessibility and availability of online content for those integrated residency programs.
A list of accredited vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, and interventional radiology residencies was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database. Program websites were evaluated by trained independent reviewers (n=2) for content items pertaining to program recruitment and education (scored absent or present). Statistical analysis was performed in R software.
Of ACGME-accredited programs, 56 of 61 (92%) vascular surgery, 27 of 27 (100%) thoracic surgery, and 74 of 85 (87%) interventional radiology programs had functional websites (P=.12). Vascular surgery websites contained a median of 26 (IQR 20-32) content items, thoracic surgery websites contained a median of 27 (IQR 21-32) content items, and interventional radiology websites contained a median of 23 (IQR 18-27) content items. Two content items considered highly influential to applicant program decisions are procedural experience and faculty mentorship, which were reported at 32% (18/56) and 11% (6/56) for vascular surgery, 19% (5/27) and 11% (3/27) for thoracic surgery, and 50% (37/74) and 15% (11/74) for interventional radiology (P=.008 and P=.75), respectively. Key deficits were work hours, debt management, and curriculum for interventional radiology; resident profiles, sample contracts, and research interests in vascular surgery; and operative experiences and the program director's contact and message for thoracic surgery. Interventional radiology deficits were work hours, and thoracic surgery deficits were procedural experience. Both interventional radiology and thoracic surgery websites lacked information on evaluation criteria and faculty mentorship.
This study has uncovered key differences in the availability of online content for residencies recruiting from the same pool of applicants. Thoracic surgery has the most information, followed by vascular surgery, with interventional radiology reporting the least content. In the era of virtual interviewing from the same potential pool of applicants, programs should review and revise their web presence with the aim to increase the availability of online content to attract valuable candidates.
随着面试转向线上进行,住院医师培训项目网站成为重要的招聘资源,能让申请者了解全国各地的项目并进行比较。据国家住院医师匹配计划报告,血管外科、胸外科和介入放射学从共同的潜在申请者库中进行招聘,竞争非常激烈,介入放射学的申请者与职位比例最高,其次是胸外科,最后是血管外科。
本研究旨在评估这些综合住院医师培训项目在线内容的可访问性和可用性。
从毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)数据库中获取经认证的血管外科、胸外科和介入放射学住院医师培训项目列表。由经过培训的独立评审员(n = 2)对项目网站进行评估,查看与项目招聘和教育相关的内容项目(按有无进行评分)。在R软件中进行统计分析。
在ACGME认证的项目中,61个血管外科项目中有56个(92%)、27个胸外科项目中的27个(100%)以及85个介入放射学项目中的74个(87%)拥有可正常访问的网站(P = 0.12)。血管外科网站的内容项目中位数为26项(四分位距20 - 32),胸外科网站为27项(四分位距21 - 32),介入放射学网站为23项(四分位距18 - 27)。对申请者项目决策有高度影响力的两个内容项目是程序经验和教员指导,血管外科报告的比例分别为32%(18/56)和11%(6/56),胸外科为19%(5/27)和11%(3/27),介入放射学为50%(37/74)和15%(11/74)(P = 0.008和P = 0.75)。关键缺陷在于介入放射学的工作时长、债务管理和课程设置;血管外科的住院医师简介、样本合同和研究兴趣;以及胸外科的手术经验和项目主任的联系方式及信息。介入放射学的缺陷是工作时长,胸外科的缺陷是程序经验。介入放射学和胸外科网站都缺乏评估标准和教员指导方面的信息。
本研究揭示了从同一申请者库中招聘的住院医师培训项目在线内容可用性的关键差异。胸外科的信息最多,其次是血管外科,介入放射学的内容最少。在从同一潜在申请者库进行线上面试的时代,各项目应审查和修订其网站,以增加在线内容的可用性,吸引有价值的候选人。