Department of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Japan.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 29;17(6):e0270569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270569. eCollection 2022.
Although vitamin D concentration is reportedly associated with the pathogenesis and pathology of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), benefits of vitamin D supplementation in SLE patients have not been elucidated, to our knowledge. We investigated the clinical impacts of vitamin D supplementation in SLE.
A cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from a lupus registry of nationwide institutions. We evaluated vitamin D supplementation status associated with disease-related Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) as a parameter of long-term disease activity control.
Of the enrolled 870 patients (mean age: 45 years, mean disease duration: 153 months), 426 (49%) received vitamin D supplementation. Patients with vitamin D supplementation were younger (43.2 vs 47.5 years, P < 0.0001), received higher doses of prednisolone (7.6 vs 6.8 mg/day, P = 0.002), and showed higher estimated glomerular filtration rates (79.3 vs 75.3 mL/min/1.73m2, P = 0.02) than those without supplementation. Disease-related SDI (0.73 ± 1.12 vs 0.73 ± 1.10, P = 0.75), total SDI, and SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) did not significantly differ between patients receiving and not receiving vitamin D supplementation. Even after excluding 136 patients who were highly recommended vitamin D supplementation (with age ≥ 75 years, history of bone fracture or avascular necrosis, denosumab use, and end-stage renal failure), disease-related SDI, total SDI, and SLEDAI did not significantly differ between the two groups.
Even with a possible Vitamin D deficiency and a high risk of bone fractures in SLE patients, only half of our cohort received its supplementation. The effect of vitamin D supplementation for disease activity control was not observed.
据报道,维生素 D 浓度与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的发病机制和病理学有关,但据我们所知,维生素 D 补充剂对 SLE 患者的益处尚未阐明。我们研究了维生素 D 补充剂在 SLE 中的临床影响。
使用来自全国性机构狼疮登记处的数据进行了横断面分析。我们评估了维生素 D 补充状态与疾病相关的系统性红斑狼疮国际合作临床/美国风湿病学会损伤指数(SDI)的关系,该指数是长期疾病活动控制的参数。
在纳入的 870 名患者中(平均年龄:45 岁,平均病程:153 个月),426 名(49%)接受了维生素 D 补充。与未接受维生素 D 补充的患者相比,接受补充的患者年龄较小(43.2 岁 vs 47.5 岁,P < 0.0001),接受更高剂量的泼尼松龙(7.6 毫克/天 vs 6.8 毫克/天,P = 0.002),并且估计肾小球滤过率更高(79.3 毫升/分钟/1.73 米 2 vs 75.3 毫升/分钟/1.73 米 2,P = 0.02)。接受和未接受维生素 D 补充的患者之间,疾病相关 SDI(0.73 ± 1.12 对 0.73 ± 1.10,P = 0.75)、总 SDI 和 SLE 疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)没有显著差异。即使排除了 136 名高度推荐接受维生素 D 补充的患者(年龄≥75 岁、有骨折或股骨头坏死史、使用地舒单抗和终末期肾病),两组之间的疾病相关 SDI、总 SDI 和 SLEDAI 也没有显著差异。
即使 SLE 患者可能存在维生素 D 缺乏和骨折风险高,但我们的队列中只有一半接受了补充。维生素 D 补充对疾病活动控制的影响尚未观察到。