• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞用于胃癌根治术后疼痛管理:一项随机、单盲、对照试验

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for pain management after gastrectomy: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial.

作者信息

Jeong Heejoon, Choi Ji Won, Sim Woo Seog, Kim Duk Kyung, Bang Yu Jeong, Park Soyoon, Yeo Hyean, Kim Hara

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2022 Jul 1;35(3):303-310. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.3.303.

DOI:10.3344/kjp.2022.35.3.303
PMID:35768985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9251398/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open gastrectomy causes severe postoperative pain. Therefore, we investigated the opioid-sparing effect of the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) after open gastrectomy.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing open gastrectomy were randomly assigned to either the ESPB group (ESPB + fentanyl based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia [IV-PCA]) or a control group (fentanyl based IV-PCA only). The primary outcome was total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain intensities using a numeric rating scale at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hour postoperatively, and the amount of fentanyl equivalent consumption during the PACU stay and at 3, 6, and 12 hour postoperatively, and the time to the first request for rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour postoperatively between the two groups ( = 0.471). Pain intensities were not significantly different between the groups except during the PACU stay and 3 hour postoperatively ( < 0.001, for both). Time to the first rescue analgesia in the ward was longer in the ESPB group than the control group ( = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided ESPB did not decrease total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour after open gastrectomy. It only reduced postoperative pain intensity until 3 hour postoperatively compared with the control group. Ultrasound-guided single-shot ESPB cannot provide an efficient opioid-sparing effect after open gastrectomy.

摘要

背景

开腹胃切除术会导致严重的术后疼痛。因此,我们研究了开腹胃切除术后超声引导下双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)的阿片类药物节省效应。

方法

接受开腹胃切除术的成年患者被随机分为ESPB组(ESPB + 基于芬太尼的静脉自控镇痛[IV-PCA])或对照组(仅基于芬太尼的IV-PCA)。主要结局是术后24小时内芬太尼等效物的总消耗量。次要结局包括在麻醉后恢复室(PACU)以及术后3、6、12和24小时使用数字评分量表评估的疼痛强度,PACU停留期间以及术后3、6和12小时芬太尼等效物的消耗量,以及首次请求救援镇痛的时间。

结果

58例患者纳入分析。两组术后24小时内芬太尼等效物的总消耗量无显著差异( = 0.471)。除了在PACU停留期间和术后3小时外,两组之间的疼痛强度无显著差异(两者均 < 0.001)。ESPB组在病房首次救援镇痛的时间比对照组更长( = 0.045)。

结论

超声引导下的ESPB在开腹胃切除术后24小时内并未减少芬太尼等效物的总消耗量。与对照组相比,它仅在术后3小时内降低了术后疼痛强度。超声引导下单次ESPB在开腹胃切除术后不能提供有效的阿片类药物节省效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d19/9251398/c987dcf8ebb0/kjp-35-3-303-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d19/9251398/c987dcf8ebb0/kjp-35-3-303-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d19/9251398/c987dcf8ebb0/kjp-35-3-303-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for pain management after gastrectomy: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial.超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞用于胃癌根治术后疼痛管理:一项随机、单盲、对照试验
Korean J Pain. 2022 Jul 1;35(3):303-310. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.3.303.
2
Ultrasound-Guided Techniques for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Quadratus Lumborum Block.超声引导技术用于腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者的术后镇痛:竖脊肌平面阻滞与腰方肌阻滞的比较
Pain Physician. 2023 May;26(3):245-256.
3
The efficacy of lumbar erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia management in patients undergoing lumbar unilateral bi-portal endoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.经腰椎单侧双通道内镜手术患者术后应用腰方肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02601-x.
4
Evaluation of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative management of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞用于电视辅助胸腔镜手术术后管理的评估:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Aug;12(8):4174-4182. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-689.
5
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Open Epigastric Hernia Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞在开放腹壁疝修补术中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):235-240. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004071.
6
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Modified-Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Lumbar Discectomy Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Study.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与改良胸椎腰椎筋膜平面阻滞在腰椎间盘切除术中的应用:一项随机对照研究。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e849-e855. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.077. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Recovery After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients With Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞对肥胖患者腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后恢复的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Ther. 2023 Sep;45(9):894-900. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
8
Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Breast Reduction Surgery: A Prospective Randomized and Controlled Trial.双侧超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞用于乳房缩小手术的围手术期镇痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1279-1288. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03315-0. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improves analgesia after laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomised controlled trial.超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞改善腹腔镜肝切除术后镇痛:一项随机对照试验
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Sep;129(3):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
10
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on analgesia and quality of recovery after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞对微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术后镇痛和恢复质量的疗效:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2024 Jan 19;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07925-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Appendectomy: A Case Series.开放阑尾切除术中竖脊肌平面阻滞:病例系列
Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2025 Jun 25;2025:3705137. doi: 10.1155/cria/3705137. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management after Hip Surgery: A Narrative Review.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于髋关节手术后疼痛管理的疗效:一项叙述性综述。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Apr 24;29(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s11916-025-01393-0.
3
Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of erector spinae plane block on the postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective double-blind study.竖脊肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后恢复质量的影响:一项前瞻性双盲研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;127(4):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
2
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞用于开放性根治性前列腺切除术患者的术后镇痛:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Sep;72:110277. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110277. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3
高胸段竖脊肌平面阻滞与颈椎硬膜外注射治疗神经根型颈椎病的疼痛缓解效果比较。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023 Oct;18(4):406-413. doi: 10.17085/apm.23064. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery for reducing opioid requirement and facilitating early ambulation: a double-blind, randomized trial.腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜结直肠手术中减少阿片类药物需求和促进早期活动:一项双盲、随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 25;13(1):12056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39265-5.
5
value, it is just not enough.仅有价值是不够的。
Korean J Pain. 2023 Jul 1;36(3):269-271. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23173. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
6
The value of the peroneus brevis tendon cross-sectional area in early diagnosing of peroneus brevis tendinitis: The peroneus brevis tendon cross-sectional area.短腓骨肌腱横截面积在早期诊断短腓骨肌腱炎中的价值:短腓骨肌腱横截面积。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 28;101(43):e31276. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031276.
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜减重手术患者中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Pain Pract. 2021 Apr;21(4):445-453. doi: 10.1111/papr.12975. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
4
Bilateral continuous erector spinae plane block: an alternative to epidural catheter for major open abdominal surgery.双侧连续竖脊肌平面阻滞:用于大型开放性腹部手术的硬膜外导管替代方法。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Sep;86(9):993-994. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14557-7. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
Comparison between the ultrasound-guided erector spinae block and the subcostal approach to the transversus abdominis plane block in obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.超声引导下竖脊肌阻滞与肋下途径腹横肌平面阻滞在接受袖状胃切除术的肥胖患者中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Aug;86(8):816-826. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14064-1. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Bilateral Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.开放腹主动脉瘤修复术中双侧连续竖脊肌平面阻滞
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Jun;34(6):1588-1590. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.01.053. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
7
Interfascial plane blocks.筋膜平面阻滞。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;33(3):303-315. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
8
Bilateral single-injection erector spinae plane block versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in living donor laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized non-inferiority trial.双侧单次注射竖脊肌平面阻滞与鞘内注射吗啡用于活体供体腹腔镜肝切除术后镇痛的随机非劣效性试验
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Oct 23. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100902.
9
Review: Gastric cancer-Clinical aspects.综述:胃癌——临床方面。
Helicobacter. 2019 Sep;24 Suppl 1:e12643. doi: 10.1111/hel.12643.
10
Multimodal analgesia with multiple intermittent doses of erector spinae plane block through a catheter after total mastectomy: a retrospective observational study.全乳切除术后通过导管多次间歇性竖脊肌平面阻滞进行多模式镇痛:一项回顾性观察研究。
Korean J Pain. 2019 Jul 1;32(3):206-214. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.3.206.