School of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China.
School of Humanities, Binzhou Polytechnic, Binzhou 256603, China.
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Jun 20;2022:6477495. doi: 10.1155/2022/6477495. eCollection 2022.
In order to clarify the spatial pattern and influencing factors on industrial agglomeration in urban agglomerations, based on the data of prefecture-level cities from 2006 to 2018, this paper uses spatial standard deviation ellipse to analyze the spatial pattern evolution of manufacturing, producer services, consumer services, and foreign-invested industries and takes a dynamic spatial Durbin model to empirically test the influencing factors of industrial agglomeration in Pearl River Delta (PRD) urban agglomeration. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) the degree of industrial agglomeration is at a low level and the difference in the industrial agglomeration level between cities is mainly manifested in the service industries; 2) manufacturing and foreign-invested industries have entered the stage of industrial diffusion, and all types of industries show an east (by south)-to-west (by north) pattern, with a trend of expansion to the south and north; 3) the agglomeration level of service industries and foreign-invested industries on the east bank of the Pearl River is higher than that on the west; and 4) from the empirical results, there is a general inertia effect in the industrial agglomeration and a siphon effect in the manufacturing agglomeration. Economic scale, transportation infrastructure, government intervention, opening up, and urban environment can all positively influence the agglomeration in some industries, with the apparent spatial spillover effects of each influencing factor. In addition, from the long-term factors of industrial agglomeration, the coordinated development of urban agglomeration is beneficial to the agglomeration of manufacturing and producer services. The research significance of this paper is that it can practically provide a more comprehensive reference for the impact mechanism of industrial agglomeration in urban agglomerations of China.
为了厘清城市群产业集聚的空间格局及其影响因素,本文基于 2006-2018 年地级城市数据,运用空间标准差椭圆分析制造业、生产性服务业、消费性服务业和外资产业集聚的空间格局演变,并采用动态空间 Durbin 模型实证检验了珠三角城市群产业集聚的影响因素。主要结论如下:1)产业集聚程度处于较低水平,城市间产业集聚水平差异主要体现在服务业;2)制造业和外资产业已进入产业扩散阶段,各类产业均呈现由东(南)向西(北)的格局,有向南北扩张的趋势;3)珠江东岸服务业和外资产业的集聚水平高于西岸;4)从实证结果来看,产业集聚存在普遍的惯性效应,制造业集聚存在虹吸效应。经济规模、交通基础设施、政府干预、开放程度和城市环境均能正向影响各产业集聚,各影响因素具有明显的空间溢出效应。此外,从产业集聚的长期因素来看,城市群的协调发展有利于制造业和生产性服务业的集聚。本文的研究意义在于,可为中国城市群产业集聚的影响机制提供更全面的实践参考。