• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A theory of fiscal policy response to an epidemic.应对疫情的财政政策理论。
Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31(9):2050-2071. doi: 10.1002/hec.4564. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
Assessing the nexus between fiscal policy, COVID-19, and economic growth.评估财政政策、COVID-19 和经济增长之间的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(43):65289-65303. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20358-z. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
Research on the Dynamic Feedback Mechanism of Fiscal Policy Regulation Under COVID-19: Evidence From China.新冠疫情下财政政策调控的动态反馈机制研究:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 5;10:931135. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.931135. eCollection 2022.
4
Universal basic income and covid-19 pandemic.普遍基本收入与新冠疫情
BMJ. 2021 Jan 26;372:n193. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n193.
5
Neoliberalism, "globalization," unemployment, inequalities, and the welfare state.新自由主义、“全球化”、失业、不平等与福利国家。
Int J Health Serv. 1998;28(4):607-82. doi: 10.2190/Y3X7-RG7E-6626-FVPT.
6
Assessing the impact of green fiscal policies and energy poverty on energy efficiency.评估绿色财政政策和能源贫困对能源效率的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):4363-4374. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15854-7. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
7
COVID-19: an opportunity for African governments to rethink social welfare benefits and protection.COVID-19:非洲政府重新思考社会福利和保障的契机。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Jun 5;35(Suppl 2):64. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.23875. eCollection 2020.
8
Fiscal sustainability in Africa: Accelerating the post-COVID-19 recovery through improved public finances.非洲的财政可持续性:通过改善公共财政加速新冠疫情后的复苏。
Afr Dev Rev. 2022 Jun;34(Suppl 1):S8-S33. doi: 10.1111/1467-8268.12648. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Short-term impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the global and Turkish economy.新冠疫情对全球和土耳其经济的短期影响。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 17;51(SI-1):3182-3193. doi: 10.3906/sag-2106-271.
10
Evaluating the influence of taxation and social security policies on psychological distress: A microsimulation study of the UK during the COVID-19 economic crisis.评估税收和社会保障政策对心理困扰的影响:新冠疫情经济危机期间英国的微观模拟研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jun;351:116953. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116953. Epub 2024 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
From isolation to revival: trade recovery amid global health crises.从隔离到复苏:全球卫生危机中的贸易复苏。
Global Health. 2024 May 6;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01048-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease and democracy: Political regimes and countries responsiveness to COVID-19.疾病与民主:政治体制与各国对新冠疫情的应对
J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Aug;212:290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2023.04.034. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Fiscal policy during a pandemic.疫情期间的财政政策。
J Econ Dyn Control. 2021 Apr;125:104088. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104088. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Comments on Epidemics in the New Keynesian model by Eichenbaum, Rebelo, and Trabandt".艾肯鲍姆、雷贝洛和特拉班特所著《新凯恩斯模型中的流行病评论》
J Econ Dyn Control. 2022 Jul;140:104307. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104307. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Fear of COVID-19 contagion and consumption: Evidence from a survey of Italian households.对 COVID-19 传染的恐惧和消费:来自意大利家庭调查的证据。
Health Econ. 2022 Mar;31(3):496-507. doi: 10.1002/hec.4464. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
5
COVID-19 doesn't need lockdowns to destroy jobs: The effect of local outbreaks in Korea.新冠疫情无需封锁措施就能导致就业岗位减少:韩国局部疫情的影响。
Labour Econ. 2021 Jun;70:101993. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101993. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
Pandemics and Economic Growth: Evidence from the 1968 H3N2 Influenza.大流行与经济增长:来自1968年H3N2流感的证据
Econ Disaster Clim Chang. 2022;6(1):73-93. doi: 10.1007/s41885-021-00096-1. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Principles of Economic Evaluation in a Pandemic Setting: An Expert Panel Discussion on Value Assessment During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.大流行背景下的经济评估原则:新冠疫情下的价值评估专家小组讨论
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1201-1208. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01088-5. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Measuring labor supply and demand shocks during COVID-19.衡量新冠疫情期间的劳动力供需冲击。
Eur Econ Rev. 2021 Oct;139:103901. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103901. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
Optimal lockdown and social welfare.最佳封锁措施与社会福利。
J Popul Econ. 2022;35(1):241-268. doi: 10.1007/s00148-021-00867-w. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
Lives saved during economic downturns: Evidence from Australia.经济衰退期间挽救的生命:来自澳大利亚的证据。
Health Econ. 2021 Sep;30(10):2452-2467. doi: 10.1002/hec.4394. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

应对疫情的财政政策理论。

A theory of fiscal policy response to an epidemic.

机构信息

School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31(9):2050-2071. doi: 10.1002/hec.4564. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4564
PMID:35771194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9349544/
Abstract

Governments worldwide have issued massive amounts of debt to inject fiscal stimulus during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper analyzes fiscal responses to an epidemic, in which interactions at work increase the risk of disease and mortality. Fiscal policies, which are designed to borrow against the future and provide transfers to individuals suffering economic hardship, can facilitate consumption smoothing while reduce hours worked and hence mitigate infections. We examine the optimal fiscal policy and characterize the condition under which fiscal policy improves social welfare. We then extend the model analyzing the static and dynamic pecuniary externalities under scale economies-the decrease in labor supply during the epidemic lowers the contemporaneous average wage rate while enhances the post-epidemic workforce health and productivity. We suggest that fiscal policy may not work effectively unless the government coordinates working time, and the optimal size of public debt is affected by production technology and disease severity and transmissibility.

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,各国政府发行了大量债务以注入财政刺激。本文分析了对传染病的财政反应,其中工作中的相互作用增加了疾病和死亡率的风险。旨在利用未来借款并向遭受经济困难的个人提供转移支付的财政政策,可以促进消费平滑,同时减少工作时间,从而减轻感染。我们研究了最优财政政策,并描述了财政政策改善社会福利的条件。然后,我们扩展模型分析了规模经济下的静态和动态货币外部性-传染病期间劳动力供应的减少降低了同期平均工资率,同时增强了传染病后的劳动力健康和生产力。我们认为,除非政府协调工作时间,否则财政政策可能无法有效发挥作用,而且最优公共债务规模受到生产技术和疾病严重程度和传染性的影响。