International Programs Department, International Medical Corps, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Programs Department, International Medical Corps, Juba, South Sudan.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0267822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267822. eCollection 2022.
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, much research has been conducted globally, but relatively few studies have been carried out in complex emergency settings that pose numerous operational challenges. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the barriers and enablers of a COVID-19 cohort study conducted in South Sudan and Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, to inform future research on COVID-19 and infectious diseases in humanitarian settings. We used a case study design embedded within the original prospective cohort study. Qualitative data was collected through four health facility assessments, 28 key informant interviews, and a focus group discussion. Data were analyzed using a manual thematic analysis approach and summarized against four primary themes: testing challenges and enablers, perceptions and attitudes towards COVID-19, national health system considerations, and study management considerations. Findings suggest most of the challenges affecting the cohort study were not specific to COVID-19 research but have been a feature of previous infectious disease research carried out in complex emergencies. However, the pandemic has exacerbated certain problems. The high proportion of travellers enrolled due to testing mandates, stigmatization of infected individuals linked to the heavy global focus on COVID-19, strained resources during waves of increasing infections, and remote management requirements all negatively impacted the cohort study. Factors that facilitated the research included proactive management, data quality oversight procedures, and strong collaboration with national health stakeholders. The global impact of COVID-19, its high public profile, and specific pandemic policies pose further operational challenges for research in already complex humanitarian settings. Future studies could plan mitigation measures that include flexibility in staffing and budgets, strategies to expand testing, and early partnerships with local organizations and health authorities.
自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来,全球范围内进行了大量研究,但在存在众多运营挑战的复杂紧急情况下进行的研究相对较少。我们进行了一项定性研究,以探讨在南苏丹和刚果民主共和国东部进行的 COVID-19 队列研究中面临的障碍和促成因素,为今后在人道主义环境中进行 COVID-19 和传染病研究提供信息。我们使用案例研究设计,将其嵌入原始前瞻性队列研究中。通过四次卫生机构评估、28 次关键知情人访谈和一次焦点小组讨论收集定性数据。使用手动主题分析方法对数据进行分析,并根据四个主要主题进行总结:测试挑战和促成因素、对 COVID-19 的看法和态度、国家卫生系统考虑因素以及研究管理考虑因素。研究结果表明,影响队列研究的大多数挑战并非特定于 COVID-19 研究,而是以往在复杂紧急情况下进行的传染病研究的特征。然而,大流行加剧了某些问题。由于测试要求,旅行者的比例很高,与全球对 COVID-19 的高度关注相关的感染者的污名化,感染人数增加期间资源紧张,以及远程管理要求,所有这些都对队列研究产生了负面影响。促进研究的因素包括积极的管理、数据质量监督程序以及与国家卫生利益攸关方的强有力合作。COVID-19 的全球影响、其高公众关注度和特定的大流行政策给已经复杂的人道主义环境中的研究带来了进一步的运营挑战。未来的研究可以计划缓解措施,包括人员配备和预算的灵活性、扩大测试的策略以及与当地组织和卫生当局的早期合作。