Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom.
Professor in Practice at the London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom.
Disasters. 2021 Dec;45 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S195-S215. doi: 10.1111/disa.12513. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
Discussions on African responses to Covid-19 have focused on the state and its international backers. Far less is known about a wider range of public authorities, including chiefs, humanitarians, criminal gangs, and armed groups. This paper investigates how the pandemic provided opportunities for claims to and contests over power in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and South Sudan. Ethnographic research is used to contend that local forms of public authority can be akin to miniature sovereigns, able to interpret dictates, policies, and advice as required. Alongside coping with existing complex protracted emergencies, many try to advance their own agendas and secure benefits. Those they seek to govern, though, do not passively accept the new normal, instead often challenging those in positions of influence. This paper assesses which of these actions and reactions will have lasting effects on local notions of statehood and argues for a public authorities lens in times of crisis.
关于非洲对新冠疫情的应对措施的讨论集中在国家及其国际支持者上。对于包括酋长、人道主义者、犯罪团伙和武装团体在内的更广泛的公共当局,人们知之甚少。本文探讨了在乌干达、刚果民主共和国和南苏丹,疫情如何为对权力的主张和争夺提供了机会。民族志研究认为,地方形式的公共当局可以类似于小型主权者,能够根据需要解释指令、政策和建议。除了应对现有的复杂长期紧急情况外,许多当局还试图推进自己的议程并确保获得利益。然而,他们试图治理的对象并不会被动地接受新常态,而是经常对有影响力的人提出质疑。本文评估了这些行动和反应中哪些将对地方国家观念产生持久影响,并主张在危机时期采用公共当局视角。