School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Psychology, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Dongguan, China.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0270709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270709. eCollection 2022.
There are several effective self-report instruments used by Chinese researchers to retrospectively assess exposure to childhood maltreatment. However, these measures do not assess the timing of exposure, restricting efforts to identify periods of development when childhood maltreatment maximally increases vulnerability to psychopathology and health outcomes. In the current study we created a Chinese version of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) scale, which assesses multiplicity (number of types of maltreatment experienced) and severity of maltreatment as well as when it occurred during childhood and adolescence. Rasch modeling was used for scale development in a sample of 812 undergraduate students. Item reduction analysis of the original 75 items produced a 58-item Chinese version with ten subdimensions. The new scale showed good three-week test-retest reliability, and good convergent validity with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the revised Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (ACEQ-R). Variance decomposition analyses found that compared to the CTQ and ACE, the MACE Severity and Multiplicity scores explained higher variance in self-reported depression and anxiety symptom ratings on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS). The results of the present study confirmed that the Chinese version of the MACE has sound psychometric properties in the Chinese cultural context. This new instrument will be a valuable tool for Chinese researchers, psychiatrists and psychologists to ascertain the type and timing of exposure to maltreatment.
有几种有效的自我报告工具被中国研究人员用来回顾性评估儿童期虐待的暴露情况。然而,这些措施并没有评估暴露的时间,这限制了识别儿童期虐待对精神病理学和健康结果影响最大的发展时期的努力。在本研究中,我们创建了一种中文版的虐待和滥用经历时间顺序(MACE)量表,该量表评估了多种(经历的虐待类型数量)和严重程度的虐待,以及它们在儿童期和青春期何时发生。在 812 名本科生的样本中,使用 Rasch 模型进行了量表开发。对原始 75 个项目的项目减少分析产生了一个包含 10 个子维度的 58 个项目的中文版本。新量表显示出良好的三周重测信度,与儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)和修订后的不良儿童经历问卷(ACEQ-R)具有良好的聚合效度。方差分解分析发现,与 CTQ 和 ACE 相比,MACE 严重程度和多样性评分在抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS)上自我报告的抑郁和焦虑症状评分中解释了更高的方差。本研究的结果证实,中文版 MACE 在中文文化背景下具有良好的心理计量学特性。这种新工具将成为中国研究人员、精神科医生和心理学家确定虐待的类型和时间的有用工具。