Suppr超能文献

英格兰前两波 COVID-19 医院死亡率的相关因素及变化:观察性研究。

Factors associated with, and variations in, COVID-19 hospital death rates in England's first two waves: observational study.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 30;12(6):e060251. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060251.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess patient-level and hospital-level predictors of death and variation in death rates following admission for COVID-19 in England's first two waves after accounting for random variation. To quantify the correlation between hospitals' first and second wave death rates.

DESIGN

Observational study using administrative data.

SETTING

Acute non-specialist hospitals in England.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

In-hospital death.

RESULTS

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data were extracted for all acute hospitals in England for COVID-19 admissions from March 2020 to March 2021. In wave 1 (March to July 2020), there were 74 484 admissions and 21 883 deaths (crude rate 29.4%); in wave 2 (August 2020 to March 2021), there were 165 642 admissions and 36 040 deaths (21.8%). Wave 2 patients were younger, with more hypertension and obesity but lower rates of other comorbidities. Mortality improved for all ages; in wave 2, it peaked in December 2020 at 24.2% (lower than wave 1's peak) but halved by March 2021. In multiple multilevel modelling combining HES with hospital-level data from Situational Reports, wave 2 and wave 1 variables significantly associated with death were mostly the same. The median odds ratio for wave 1 was just 1.05 and for wave 2 was 1.07. At 99.8% control limits, 3% of hospitals were high and 7% were low funnel plot outliers in wave 1; these figures were 9% and 12% for wave 2. Four hospitals were (low) outliers in both waves. The correlation between hospitals' adjusted mortality rates between waves was 0.45 (p<0.0001). Length of stay was similar in each wave.

CONCLUSIONS

England's first two COVID-19 waves were similar regarding predictors and moderate interhospital variation. Despite the challenges, variation in death rates and length of stay between hospitals was modest and might be accounted for by unobserved patient factors.

摘要

目的

在考虑随机变异的情况下,评估英格兰前两波 COVID-19 入院患者和医院水平的死亡预测因素以及死亡率的变化。量化医院第一波和第二波死亡率之间的相关性。

设计

使用管理数据的观察性研究。

设置

英格兰的非专科急症医院。

参与者

所有因 COVID-19 住院的患者,有主要诊断。

主要和次要结果

从 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月,从英格兰所有急性医院提取了医院入院数据(HES)。在第一波(2020 年 3 月至 7 月)中,有 74484 例住院和 21883 例死亡(粗死亡率 29.4%);在第二波(2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 3 月)中,有 165642 例住院和 36040 例死亡(21.8%)。第二波患者更年轻,患有更多的高血压和肥胖症,但其他合并症的发病率较低。所有年龄段的死亡率均有所改善;在第二波中,死亡率在 2020 年 12 月达到峰值,为 24.2%(低于第一波峰值),但到 2021 年 3 月减半。在结合 Situational Reports 中来自医院层面数据的多项多层模型中,与死亡相关的第二波和第一波变量大多相同。第一波的中位数优势比为 1.05,第二波为 1.07。在 99.8%的控制限内,第一波有 3%的医院为高且 7%为低漏斗图异常值;第二波为 9%和 12%。有 4 家医院在两波中都是(低)异常值。医院在两波之间的调整死亡率之间的相关性为 0.45(p<0.0001)。每个波的住院时间相似。

结论

英格兰的前两波 COVID-19 在预测因素和医院间的中度变异方面相似。尽管面临挑战,但医院间死亡率和住院时间的变异较小,可能可以通过未观察到的患者因素来解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3494/9247323/eae7c7a7d900/bmjopen-2021-060251f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验