Suppr超能文献

《孤独症诊断观察量表第二版(韩国版,K-ADOS-2)》在韩国人群中的诊断效度。

Diagnostic validity of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, second edition (K-ADOS-2) in the Korean population.

作者信息

Kim So Yoon, Oh Miae, Bong Guiyoung, Song Da-Yea, Yoon Nan-He, Kim Joo Hyun, Yoo Hee Jeong

机构信息

Teacher Education, Duksung Women's University, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Mol Autism. 2022 Jun 30;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00506-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the Korean version of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 (K-ADOS-2) is widely being used to diagnose autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in South Korea, no previous study has examined the validity and reliability of all modules of K-ADOS-2 across a wide age range, particularly older children, adolescents, and adults.

METHOD

Data from 2,158 participants were included (mean age = 79.7 months; 73.6% male): 1473 participants with ASD and 685 participants without ASD (Toddler Module, n = 289; Module 1, n = 642; Module 2 n = 574; Module 3 n = 411; Module 4, n = 242). Participants completed a battery of tests, including the K-ADOS or K-ADOS-2 and other existing diagnostic instruments. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), Cohen's kappa (k), and agreement with existing diagnostic instruments were computed. Cronbach's α values were also calculated.

RESULTS

All developmental cells of the K-ADOS-2 showed sufficient ranges of sensitivity 85.4-100.0%; specificity, 80.4-96.8%; area under the ROC curve, .90-.97; PPV, 77.8-99.3%; NPV, 80.6-100.0%; and k values, .83-.92. The kappa agreements of developmental cells with existing diagnostic instruments ranged from .20 to .90. Cronbach's α values ranged from .82 to .91 across all developmental cells.

LIMITATION

The best-estimate clinical diagnoses made in this study were not independent of the K-ADOS-2 scores. Some modules did not include balanced numbers of participants in terms of gender and diagnostic status.

CONCLUSION

The K-ADOS-2 is a valid and reliable instrument in diagnosing ASD in South Korea. Future studies exploring the effectiveness of the K-ADOS-2 in capturing restricted, repetitive behaviors and differentiating ASD from other developmental disabilities are needed.

摘要

背景

尽管韩国版自闭症诊断观察量表第二版(K-ADOS-2)在韩国被广泛用于诊断自闭症谱系障碍(ASD),但此前尚无研究在较宽年龄范围内,尤其是大龄儿童、青少年和成人中,检验K-ADOS-2所有模块的有效性和可靠性。

方法

纳入2158名参与者的数据(平均年龄=79.7个月;73.6%为男性):1473名患有ASD的参与者和685名未患ASD的参与者(幼儿模块,n=289;模块1,n=642;模块2,n=574;模块3,n=411;模块4,n=242)。参与者完成了一系列测试,包括K-ADOS或K-ADOS-2以及其他现有的诊断工具。计算了敏感性、特异性、受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、科恩kappa值(k)以及与现有诊断工具的一致性。还计算了克朗巴哈α值。

结果

K-ADOS-2的所有发育单元均显示出足够的敏感性范围(85.4%-100.0%)、特异性(80.4%-96.8%)、ROC曲线下面积(0.90-0.97)、PPV(77.8%-99.3%)、NPV(80.6%-100.0%)和k值(0.83-0.92)。发育单元与现有诊断工具的kappa一致性范围为0.20至0.90。所有发育单元的克朗巴哈α值范围为从0.82至0.91。

局限性

本研究中做出的最佳估计临床诊断并非独立于K-ADOS-2分数。一些模块在性别和诊断状态方面没有纳入均衡数量的参与者。

结论

K-ADOS-2在韩国是诊断ASD的有效且可靠的工具。未来需要开展研究,探索K-ADOS-2在捕捉受限的重复行为以及区分ASD与其他发育障碍方面的有效性。

相似文献

2
Replication study of ADOS-2 Toddler Module cut-off scores for autism spectrum disorder classification.
Autism Res. 2021 Jun;14(6):1284-1295. doi: 10.1002/aur.2496. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Psychometric properties of the Mandarin version of the autism diagnostic observation Schedule-Generic.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2023 Jul;122(7):574-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
5
Replication study for ADOS-2 cut-offs to assist evaluation of autism spectrum disorder.
Autism Res. 2022 Nov;15(11):2181-2191. doi: 10.1002/aur.2801. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
7
[ADI-R and ADOS and the differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders: Interests, limits and openings].
Encephale. 2019 Nov;45(5):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Examining the Diagnostic Validity of Autism Measures Among Adults in an Outpatient Clinic Sample.
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Mar 1;1(1):60-68. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0023. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
9
Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD009044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009044.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Autism Assessment with English-Spanish Bilingual Individuals in the United States.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06965-y.
2
Community testing practices for autism within the autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;38(5):426-431. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13077. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
3
A Pilot Study on the Validity and Reliability of Korean School Readiness Inventory on Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Oct;20(10):940-945. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0137. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
Psychometric Evaluation of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales (6-18 Years Parent Report) in a Clinical Sample.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Mar;54(3):1024-1035. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05871-x. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
A predictive ensemble classifier for the gene expression diagnosis of ASD at ages 1 to 4 years.
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;28(2):822-833. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01826-x. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
6
Dynamic time warping outperforms Pearson correlation in detecting atypical functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders.
Neuroimage. 2020 Dec;223:117383. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117383. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of Social Responsiveness Scale for Korean Preschool Children With Autism.
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Sep;18(9):831-840. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0182. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
2
Validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised in the Korean Population.
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Mar;18(3):196-204. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0337. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
3
State and Trait Anxiety of Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Mar;18(3):257-265. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0328. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
4
Replication study of ADOS-2 Toddler Module cut-off scores for autism spectrum disorder classification.
Autism Res. 2021 Jun;14(6):1284-1295. doi: 10.1002/aur.2496. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
A Comparative Analysis of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 Algorithms: Preliminary Findings.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Jun;48(6):2078-2089. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3475-3.
10
Adaptation and Validation of the ADOS-2, Polish Version.
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 7;8:1916. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01916. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验