• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance isoflucypram.活性物质异氟吡草胺农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 23;20(6):e07328. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7328. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metrafenone.活性物质唑菌胺酯农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 May 22;21(5):e08012. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8012. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fenpicoxamid (XDE-777).活性物质氟吡菌酰胺(XDE-777)农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 31;16(1):e05146. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5146. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance sulfur.活性物质硫磺农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 Mar 8;21(3):e07805. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7805. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mecoprop-P.活性物质麦草畏-P农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2017 May 18;15(5):e04832. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4832. eCollection 2017 May.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethephon.活性物质乙烯利农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):e07742. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7742. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance propiconazole.活性物质丙环唑农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Jul 12;15(7):e04887. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4887. eCollection 2017 Jul.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance BAS 750 F (mefentrifluconazole).活性物质 BAS 750 F(联苯三唑醇)农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 25;16(7):e05379. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5379. eCollection 2018 Jul.
9
Updated conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mecoprop-P.关于活性物质吡氟氯禾灵农药风险评估同行评审的最新结论。
EFSA J. 2023 Oct 27;21(10):e08344. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8344. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance imazosulfuron.活性物质咪唑磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Feb 15;15(2):e04695. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4695. eCollection 2017 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 55th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).为在农药残留法典委员会(CCPR)第55届会议上制定欧盟立场提供科学支持。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 18;22(7):e8841. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8841. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 54th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).为欧盟在农药残留法典委员会(CCPR)第54届会议上准备立场提供科学支持。
EFSA J. 2023 Aug 30;21(8):e08111. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8111. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).关于植物保护产品对蜜蜂( 、 属及独居蜂)风险评估的修订指南
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products.植保产品风险评估中操作人员、工人、居民和旁观者暴露评估指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009.关于在(欧盟)第528/2012号法规和(欧盟)第1107/2009号法规背景下识别内分泌干扰物的指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 7;16(6):e05311. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5311. eCollection 2018 Jun.

活性物质异氟吡草胺农药风险评估的同行评审。

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance isoflucypram.

作者信息

Alvarez Fernando, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Binaglia Marco, Castoldi Anna Federica, Chiusolo Arianna, Colagiorgi Angelo, Colas Mathilde, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Ferilli Franco, Gouliarmou Varvara, Nogareda Laia Herrero, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Kienzler Aude, Lanzoni Anna, Lava Roberto, Leuschner Renata, Linguadoca Alberto, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Terron Andrea, Theobald Anne, Tiramani Manuela, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2022 Jun 23;20(6):e07328. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7328. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7328
PMID:35774586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9220926/
Abstract

The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member States, the United Kingdom (former) and France (after withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU), for the pesticide active substance isoflucypram. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of isoflucypram as a fungicide on wheat, rye, triticale, barley and oats (field use). The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)对报告成员国(前)英国和(英国退出欧盟后)法国的主管当局就农药活性物质isoflucypram开展的初始风险评估进行同行评审后得出的结论。同行评审的背景是欧洲议会和理事会第1107/2009号(EC)条例所要求的。这些结论是在评估isoflucypram作为杀菌剂在小麦、黑麦、小黑麦、大麦和燕麦上的代表性用途(田间使用)的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了一些问题。