Khalaf Hasan, Almothafar Basim, Alhalabi Noor
Cross University Hospital, London UK.
Surgery-University Malaysia Sabah-Malaysia.
Acta Inform Med. 2022 Jun;30(2):105-109. doi: 10.5455/aim.2022.30.105-109.
There are three undergraduate medical school curricula types - 'traditional', 'integrated', and 'problem-based learning' (PBL). Traditional curricula involve teaching basic medical science in the early years in an atomistic and often didactic way, predominantly through lectures. In later years, students move on to learning clinical skills and applying their medical knowledge in clinical settings. Meanwhile, the philosophy of integrated curricula is that students learn best by understanding medical science in relation to whole systems and by linking knowledge with practice. Integrated curricula take a more holistic approach and bring together elements of medical science rather than teaching them in isolation.
The study aimed to measure and compare perceptions of the learning environment between two cohorts of medical students at a medical school in Iraq. The intention was to explore differences in perceptions between those following a traditional surgical curriculum and those following an innovative, integrated curriculum and thereby add to the body of evidence looking at the impact of the two surgical curriculum models on the learning environment.
The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) was used to measure students' perceptions of their learning environment. The unpaired t-test was used to compare the mean scores of two cohorts of medical students.
The global mean score for the students following the integrated curriculum was higher than the global mean scores for the group studying the traditional curriculum. This difference is statistically significant. The mean scores for the integrated curriculum students are higher than those of the traditional curriculum students for all sub-sets of the measure. The difference is statistically significant for one sub-set, 'Students' Perceptions of Learning,' and the difference is close to being statistically significant for the 'Students' Perception of Teachers' sub-set.
The results reflect those from other international studies and add to the body of evidence that suggests that innovative, integrated curricula are a critical factor in promoting a more positive learning environment than that generated within a traditional curriculum model.
本科医学院课程有三种类型——“传统型”、“整合型”和“基于问题的学习”(PBL)。传统课程在早期以原子论且通常是说教式的方式教授基础医学,主要通过讲座进行。在后期,学生转向学习临床技能并将医学知识应用于临床环境。同时,整合课程的理念是学生通过理解与整个系统相关的医学科学并将知识与实践联系起来,能学得最好。整合课程采用更全面的方法,将医学科学的各个要素整合在一起,而不是孤立地教授它们。
该研究旨在测量和比较伊拉克一所医学院的两批医学生对学习环境的看法。目的是探索遵循传统外科课程的学生与遵循创新型整合课程的学生在看法上的差异,从而增加关于这两种外科课程模式对学习环境影响的证据。
使用邓迪学习环境就绪度测量量表(DREEM)来测量学生对其学习环境的看法。使用独立样本t检验比较两批医学生的平均得分。
遵循整合课程的学生的总体平均得分高于学习传统课程的学生的总体平均得分。这种差异具有统计学意义。对于该测量量表的所有子集,整合课程学生的平均得分均高于传统课程学生。对于一个子集“学生对学习的看法”,差异具有统计学意义,对于“学生对教师的看法”子集,差异接近具有统计学意义。
结果与其他国际研究结果一致,并增加了证据表明创新型整合课程是促进比传统课程模式更积极的学习环境的关键因素。