Suppr超能文献

萨拉热窝大学医学院博洛尼亚进程的实施效率

Efficiency of implementation of the bologna process at medical faculty, university of sarajevo.

作者信息

Masic Izet, Begic Edin

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Mater Sociomed. 2015 Feb;27(1):59-63. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.27.59-63. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

At the moment at Medical Faculty, University of Sarajevo, simultaneously exist two systems of teaching process, the old (pre-Bologna) and Bologna process.

GOAL

To show efficiency and justification of use of Bologna process at Medical Faculty, University of Sarajevo, through the prism of actual beneficiaries of this process, students, assessment of quality of medical education, and comparison of results of the teaching process evaluation between students studying according to the Bologna process and the old system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included period from 2012 to 2014, and had prospective character. Students of final (sixth) year were included, the last three generations of pre-Bologna, and three generations of the Bologna process, which completed their studies successfully. The study included 365 students (177 under the old system and 188 under the Bologna process), who had answered prepared questionnaire.

RESULTS

The presence of large number of female students, in both systems is significant. There were significant differences in opinion of students regarding the quality of space for administration and labor administration, informatization of the teaching process, the opinion of the objectivity of teachers in the assessment of the examination, and on-line access to their content. (p <0.05).

DISCUSSION

The Bologna process, with all its guidelines, was never to the maximum implemented in the teaching faculties, mostly because of the lack of funds and infrastructure that couldn't fully comply with all the privileges of the Bologna process.

CONCLUSION

Bologna process on this principle, has brought mediocrity, of which we have tried to escape. New school year, brings, and the new Bologna process, a new curriculum, a large number of new classes, systematization of the material, with simultaneous correction necessary in one hand in teaching, and in other hand in students themselves.

摘要

引言

目前在萨拉热窝大学医学院,同时存在两种教学过程体系,即旧的(博洛尼亚进程之前的)体系和博洛尼亚进程体系。

目标

通过该进程的实际受益者(学生)这一视角,对医学教育质量进行评估,并比较按照博洛尼亚进程学习的学生与旧体系学生的教学过程评估结果,以展示萨拉热窝大学医学院采用博洛尼亚进程的效率和合理性。

材料与方法

该研究涵盖2012年至2014年期间,具有前瞻性。纳入了最后(第六)学年的学生,即博洛尼亚进程之前的最后三代学生以及成功完成学业的博洛尼亚进程的三代学生。该研究包括365名学生(旧体系下177名,博洛尼亚进程下188名),他们回答了预先准备好的问卷。

结果

在两个体系中,女生数量众多这一情况很显著。学生们在行政和劳动管理空间质量、教学过程信息化、教师考试评估的客观性以及在线获取其内容方面的看法存在显著差异(p<0.05)。

讨论

博洛尼亚进程及其所有指导方针在教学院系中从未得到最大程度的实施,主要是因为缺乏资金和基础设施,无法完全符合博洛尼亚进程的所有特权。

结论

基于这一原则的博洛尼亚进程带来了我们一直试图摆脱的平庸。新学年带来了新的博洛尼亚进程、新的课程、大量新的课程、材料的系统化,同时在教学方面以及学生自身方面都需要进行必要的修正。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6345/4384880/71698d4cb2c7/MSM-27-59-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验