Suppr超能文献

在急诊科对临床虚弱量表进行评分:家庭FIRsT经验

Scoring the Clinical Frailty Scale in the Emergency Department: The Home FIRsT Experience.

作者信息

Thorpe Owen, McCabe Elva, Herrero Elena Marie, Doyle William Ormiston, Dillon Aoife, Edge Lucinda, Flynn Sinéad, Mullen Anna, Davis Aisling, Molamphy Aoife, Kirwan Anna, Briggs Robert, Lavan Amanda H, Shields Darragh, McMahon Geraldine, Hennessy Arthur, Kennedy Una, Staunton Paul, Kidney Emer, Yeung Sarah-Jane, Glynn Deirdre, Horgan Frances, Cunningham Conal, Romero-Ortuno Roman

机构信息

School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

MedEL Directorate, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2022 Jun 1;7(2):95-100. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-07-095. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

We evaluated predictors of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scored by an interdisciplinary team (Home FIRsT) performing comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in our Emergency Department (ED). This was a retrospective observational study (service evaluation) utilising ED-based CGA data routinely collected by Home FIRsT between January and October 2020. A linear regression model was computed to establish independent predictors of CFS. This was complemented by a classification and regression tree (CRT) to evaluate the main predictors. There were 799 Home FIRsT episodes, of which 740 were unique patients. The CFS was scored on 658 (89%) (median 4, range 1-8; mean age 81 years, 61% women). Independent predictors of higher CFS were older age (p<0.001), history of dementia (p<0.001), mobility (p≤0.007), disability (p<0.001), and higher acuity of illness (p=0.009). Disability and mobility were the main classifiers in the CRT. Results suggest appropriate CFS scoring informed by functional baseline.

摘要

我们评估了在急诊科由进行综合老年评估(CGA)的跨学科团队(Home FIRsT)对临床衰弱量表(CFS)进行评分的预测因素。这是一项回顾性观察研究(服务评估),利用了Home FIRsT在2020年1月至10月期间常规收集的基于急诊科的CGA数据。计算了一个线性回归模型以确定CFS的独立预测因素。通过分类回归树(CRT)对其进行补充,以评估主要预测因素。共有799次Home FIRsT诊疗事件,其中740例为不同患者。对658例(89%)进行了CFS评分(中位数为4,范围1 - 8;平均年龄81岁,61%为女性)。CFS评分较高的独立预测因素为年龄较大(p<0.001)、痴呆病史(p<0.001)、活动能力(p≤0.007)、残疾(p<0.001)以及疾病严重程度较高(p = 0.009)。残疾和活动能力是CRT中的主要分类因素。结果表明,基于功能基线进行适当的CFS评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db4/9175280/61c3e2f5e6e6/JFSF-7-095-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验