University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, University of Alaska Fairbanks International Arctic Research Center, Postboks 570, Pinngortitaleriffik, Nuuk, 3900, Greenland.
Conserv Biol. 2022 Dec;36(6):e13972. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13972. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
Indigenous communities at the front lines of climate change and biodiversity loss are increasingly shaping the conservation of lands, waters, and species. The Arctic is a hotbed for emerging local, national, and international conservation efforts, and researchers, managers, and communities alike will benefit from a framework that improves approaches to Indigenous partnerships. Co-productive conservation is a framework that encompasses both the co-production of knowledge and the co-production of public services to pursue ethically conscious, culturally relevant, and fully knowledge-based approaches to biodiversity concerns. Co-productive conservation recognizes that conservation can be practiced in a way that embodies Indigenous perspectives, knowledge, rights, priorities, and livelihoods. Six iterative and reflexive co-production processes (i.e., co-planning, co-prioritizing, co-learning, co-managing, co-delivering, and co-assessing) focus on the human dimensions that allow research, management, and conservation to affect change. By opening discussions on how to structure conservation efforts in partnership with Indigenous communities, the conservation community can move away from narratives that perceive Indigenous participation as an obligation or part of an ethical narrative and instead embrace a process that broadens the evidence base and situates conservation within Indigenous contexts.
原住民社区处于气候变化和生物多样性丧失的前沿,他们正在越来越多地塑造土地、水域和物种的保护方式。北极地区是新兴的地方、国家和国际保护努力的温床,研究人员、管理者和社区都将受益于一个改进原住民伙伴关系方法的框架。合作性保护是一个框架,它包含知识的共同生产和公共服务的共同生产,以追求对生物多样性问题有道德意识、文化相关和充分基于知识的方法。合作性保护认识到,可以以体现原住民观点、知识、权利、优先事项和生计的方式进行保护。六个迭代和反思的共同生产过程(即共同规划、共同优先、共同学习、共同管理、共同提供和共同评估)侧重于人类维度,这些维度允许研究、管理和保护产生影响。通过讨论如何与原住民社区合作构建保护工作,可以使保护界摆脱将原住民参与视为义务或道德叙事一部分的叙述,而是采用一种拓宽证据基础并将保护置于原住民背景下的过程。