Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Oct;27(7):2801-2809. doi: 10.1007/s40519-022-01430-6. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
Motivations underlying exercise may contribute to the extent to which exercise is maladaptive, independent of exercise frequency. Extrinsic and intrinsic exercise motivation may independently moderate associations between exercise frequency and 1) compulsive and 2) healthy exercise. It was expected that among individuals with high extrinsic motivation, greater exercise frequency would be associated with more compulsive exercise, whereas among individuals with high intrinsic motivation, greater exercise frequency would be associated with more healthy exercise.
A total of 446 university students (50.9% female; 67.0% White) completed measures of intrinsic and extrinsic exercise motivations, exercise frequency, compulsive exercise, and healthy exercise. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for exercise were entered as simultaneous independent moderators of the associations between exercise frequency and 1) compulsive exercise and 2) healthy exercise in multiple linear regressions.
Moderation effects of exercise motivation were not supported for compulsive exercise. Only main effects of frequency (b = 0.04, p < 0.01) and extrinsic motivation (b = 0.27, p < 0.01) were observed. Intrinsic motivation moderated the association between frequency and healthy exercise (b = -0.02, p = 0.03). Among individuals with lower intrinsic motivation, greater frequency was related to more healthy exercise. This association was significantly weaker among individuals with high intrinsic motivation.
Consistent with theory and extant work, extrinsic motivation was associated with compulsive exercise, while intrinsic motivation was associated with healthy exercise. Clinically, assessing the extent to which exercise is intrinsically or extrinsically motivated may help identify whether individuals may be more likely to engage in compulsive versus healthy exercise. Results support the importance of exploring the exercise motivations as predictors of compulsive and healthy exercise.
Level V, Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.
运动的动机可能会影响运动的适应程度,而与运动频率无关。外在和内在的运动动机可能会独立地调节运动频率与 1)强迫性和 2)健康运动之间的关联。预计在高外在动机的个体中,较高的运动频率与更多的强迫性运动有关,而在高内在动机的个体中,较高的运动频率与更多的健康运动有关。
共有 446 名大学生(50.9%女性;67.0%为白人)完成了内在和外在运动动机、运动频率、强迫性运动和健康运动的测量。在多元线性回归中,将运动动机作为内在和外在动机同时作为运动频率与 1)强迫性运动和 2)健康运动之间关联的独立调节因素。
运动动机的调节作用不支持强迫性运动。仅观察到频率(b=0.04,p<0.01)和外在动机(b=0.27,p<0.01)的主要效应。内在动机调节了频率与健康运动之间的关联(b=-0.02,p=0.03)。在内在动机较低的个体中,较高的频率与更多的健康运动有关。在内在动机较高的个体中,这种关联明显较弱。
与理论和现有研究一致,外在动机与强迫性运动有关,而内在动机与健康运动有关。临床上,评估运动是内在还是外在动机可能有助于确定个体是否更有可能从事强迫性运动还是健康运动。结果支持探索运动动机作为强迫性和健康运动预测因子的重要性。
五级,描述性横断面研究。