Alice-Anne Thompson Alcorn, DDS, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Laila Al Dehailan, BDS, MSD, PhD, Indiana University School of Dentistry, IN, USA.
Oper Dent. 2022 May 1;47(3):309-319. doi: 10.2341/20-237-L.
This laboratory study evaluated the longitudinal surface microhardness changes in early, incipient, noncavitated, white-spot, enamel caries lesions treated with silver diamine fluoride (SDF). Five intervention groups (SDF, AgNO3, KF, 5% sodium fluoride varnish (FV), deionized water (DI)) × two-time intervals after intervention (immediate & delayed pH-cycling) resulted in 10 groups (n=18). Silver nitrate (AgNO3) and potassium fluoride (KF) groups served as controls to assist in evaluating if remineralization effects were due to the silver or fluoride component in SDF. Early, incipient, noncavitated, white-spot, enamel caries lesions were created in bovine enamel, the extent of demineralization was determined using Vickers surface microhardness (VHNlesion). Intervention treatments were applied. Half the specimens from each group underwent immediate 5-day pH-cycling, and half were stored in an incubator with artificial saliva for 2 weeks before undergoing 5-day pH-cycling. After pH-cycling, lesion hardness was evaluated using VHNpost. Specimens were then exposed to a second demineralization challenge, and lesion softening was evaluated (VHNsecdem). Hardness variables were calculated: ΔVHN = VHNpost - VHNlesion; ΔVHNsecdem = VHNsecdem - VHNpost. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (α=0.05). Immediately cycled, SDF had significantly (p<0.0001) greater remineralization than DI, AgNO3, and FV. All delayed cycling groups had significantly greater remineralization than FV (p<0.0001). Significantly greater remineralization was noted in delayed AgNO3 (p≤0.0001), DI (p=0.0003), and FV (p=0.0006) compared to immediately cycled. After the second demineralization challenge, FV had significantly less surface softening than AgNO3 (p=0.0002), DI (p=0.0003), KF (p=0.0225), and SDF (p=0.0388) intervention groups. No significant difference was found between the pH-cycle timings (p=0.2710). Based the present findings, FV may be better suited than SDF to treat early, incipient, noncavitated, white-spot, enamel caries lesions.
本实验室研究评估了经氟化银(SDF)处理的早期、初期、非龋性、白垩斑、釉质龋病变的表面显微硬度的纵向变化。五个干预组(SDF、AgNO3、KF、5%氟化钠涂料(FV)、去离子水(DI))×干预后两个时间间隔(即刻和延迟 pH 循环)导致 10 个组(n=18)。硝酸银(AgNO3)和氟化钾(KF)组作为对照,以协助评估再矿化效果是否归因于 SDF 中的银或氟成分。在牛牙釉质上创建了早期、初期、非龋性、白垩斑、釉质龋病变,使用维氏表面显微硬度(VHNlesion)确定脱矿程度。进行干预治疗。每个组的一半标本立即进行为期 5 天的 pH 循环,另一半标本在孵育器中用人工唾液储存 2 周,然后再进行 5 天的 pH 循环。pH 循环后,使用 VHNpost 评估病变硬度。然后将标本暴露于第二次脱矿挑战,并评估病变软化(VHNsecdem)。计算硬度变量:ΔVHN = VHNpost-VHNlesion;ΔVHNsecdem = VHNsecdem-VHNpost。使用双因素方差分析(α=0.05)分析数据。立即循环的 SDF 具有显著(p<0.0001)高于 DI、AgNO3 和 FV 的再矿化作用。所有延迟循环组的再矿化作用均显著高于 FV(p<0.0001)。延迟 AgNO3(p≤0.0001)、DI(p=0.0003)和 FV(p=0.0006)的再矿化作用明显大于即刻循环。在第二次脱矿挑战后,FV 的表面软化程度明显低于 AgNO3(p=0.0002)、DI(p=0.0003)、KF(p=0.0225)和 SDF(p=0.0388)干预组。在 pH 循环时间(p=0.2710)之间未发现显著差异。基于目前的研究结果,FV 可能比 SDF 更适合治疗早期、初期、非龋性、白垩斑、釉质龋病变。