Suppr超能文献

胆汁酸螯合剂治疗对胆汁酸腹泻患者生活质量的影响。

The impact of treatment with bile acid sequestrants on quality of life in patients with bile acid diarrhoea.

机构信息

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton Road, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK.

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Research Institute in Healthcare Science, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02404-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) can be severely debilitating and negatively affect patients' quality of life (QoL). We carried out a multi-centre prospective study exploring QoL outcomes in patients with BAD after treatment with colesevelam.

METHODS

Patients with or without a positive 23-seleno-25-homotaurocholic acid (SeHCAT) scan were recruited and categorised into four groups: SeHCAT negative control group (CG), idiopathic BAD, post-cholecystectomy (PC) and post-terminal ileal resection for Crohn's disease (CD). Patients with a positive SeHCAT were treated with colesevelam and dosing was titrated to symptomatic response. Patients were reviewed at 4- and 8-weekly intervals and QoL was evaluated by EQ-5D-3L, SF-36, IBDQ-32 at each visit (where relevant). Patients with a negative SeHCAT (CG cohort) completed one set of questionnaires before being discharged from the study.

RESULTS

47 patients (BAD = 24, PC = 12, CD = 11) completed paired QoL questionnaires before and after treatment and 30 CG patients completed a baseline questionnaire. There was a significant improvement in IBDQ-32 mean scores before and after treatment in CD patients [134.6 (95%CI 112.5-156.6) and 158.4 (136.1-180.6), respectively (p = 0.007). Following treatment, BAD patients had significantly improved mean SF-36 scores in the "Role limitation due to physical health" dimension (p = 0.02) and in the overall mental component summary (p = 0.03). Prior to starting treatment, BAD patients had the lowest scores in the 'activity' dimension of the EQ-5D-3L (p = 0.04), which improved significantly after treatment (p = 0.002). Overall, the BAD and CD cohort showed improved mean scores with treatment in all components of the SF-36 and EQ-5D-3L, while the PC cohort showed a general decline in mean scores after treatment. 55% of patients clinically responded to treatment of which 41.7%, 58.3% and 81.8% responded from the BAD, PC and CD groups respectively. Correlations between those deemed as responders with improvements on the SF-36 and EQ-5D dimensions were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate improved QoL in the BAD and CD cohort with treatment. Further larger studies are recommended specifically investigating the PC cohort and whether patients may improve with newer treatments such as FXR agonists. Trial registration Ethical approval REC Ref: 16/LO/1325.

摘要

背景

胆酸腹泻(BAD)可能会严重削弱患者的身体机能,降低生活质量(QoL)。我们进行了一项多中心前瞻性研究,探讨了使用考来烯胺治疗后 BAD 患者的 QoL 结果。

方法

招募了有或没有 23-硒-25-同牛磺酸(SeHCAT)扫描阳性的患者,并将其分为四组:SeHCAT 阴性对照组(CG)、特发性 BAD、胆囊切除术后(PC)和克罗恩病(CD)末端回肠切除术后。SeHCAT 阳性的患者接受考来烯胺治疗,并根据症状反应滴定剂量。患者每 4-8 周进行一次复查,并在每次就诊时(如适用)使用 EQ-5D-3L、SF-36、IBDQ-32 评估 QoL。CG 队列中的 SeHCAT 阴性(CG)患者在出院前完成了一套问卷。

结果

47 名患者(BAD=24 名,PC=12 名,CD=11 名)在治疗前后完成了配对的 QoL 问卷,30 名 CG 患者完成了基线问卷。CD 患者在治疗前后 IBDQ-32 平均评分均有显著改善[分别为 134.6(95%CI 112.5-156.6)和 158.4(136.1-180.6),p=0.007]。治疗后,BAD 患者在“身体受限引起的角色受限”维度(p=0.02)和总体心理健康成分综合评分(p=0.03)的 SF-36 平均评分显著改善。治疗前,BAD 患者在 EQ-5D-3L 的“活动”维度的评分最低(p=0.04),治疗后显著改善(p=0.002)。总体而言,BAD 和 CD 队列在 SF-36 和 EQ-5D-3L 的所有组成部分的平均评分均有改善,而 PC 队列在治疗后平均评分普遍下降。55%的患者对治疗有临床反应,其中 BAD、PC 和 CD 组的反应率分别为 41.7%、58.3%和 81.8%。认为对治疗有反应的患者与 SF-36 和 EQ-5D 维度的改善之间的相关性无统计学意义。

结论

我们的结果表明,BAD 和 CD 队列的 QoL 在治疗后得到改善。建议进一步开展更大规模的研究,专门研究 PC 队列,并探讨是否可以通过新型治疗方法(如 FXR 激动剂)使患者受益。

试验注册

伦理批准 REC Ref: 16/LO/1325。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e620/9250209/a981aac54500/12876_2022_2404_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验