Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.
Premium Postdoctoral Research Program, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Nádor u. 7, Budapest, 1051, Hungary.
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):141-152. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2003-4. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
The EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) is the most commonly used instrument to obtain utility values for cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments for Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to compare the measurement properties of the two adult versions of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) in patients with CD.
Between 2016 and 2017, a multicentre cross-sectional survey was carried out. Consecutive outpatients with CD completed the 3L, 5L and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). Disease severity was graded by the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI). The 3L and 5L were compared in terms of feasibility, agreement, ceiling effect, redistribution properties, discriminatory power, convergent and known-groups validity.
Two-hundred and six patients (54.9% male, mean age 35 ± 11 years) participated in the survey. For 3L, 25 unique health states were observed versus 59 for the 5L. The overall ceiling effect decreased from 29.6% (3L) to 25.5% (5L). Absolute discriminatory power improved (mean Shannon index 0.84 vs. 1.18). The 3L correlated stronger with EQ VAS and CDAI scores, whereas the 5L with PDAI. The 5L demonstrated a better known-groups validity on the basis of age, perianal fistulas, extraintestinal manifestations and disability.
This is the first study to report the impact of CD on quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The 5L seems to perform better than 3L in terms of feasibility, ceiling effect, discriminatory power and known-groups validity. Understanding the differences in psychometrics between the 3L and 5L is essential as they have substantial implications for financial decision-making about CD treatments.
EuroQol 五维健康量表(EQ-5D)是最常用于评估克罗恩病(CD)治疗成本效益的工具,它可以提供效用值。本研究旨在比较 CD 患者使用 EQ-5D 的两种成人版本(EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L)的测量特性。
2016 年至 2017 年期间,我们进行了一项多中心横断面调查。连续的门诊 CD 患者完成了 3L、5L 和 EQ 视觉模拟量表(VAS)的评估。疾病严重程度通过克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)和肛周疾病活动指数(PDAI)进行分级。在可行性、一致性、天花板效应、再分配特性、判别能力、收敛和已知组有效性方面比较了 3L 和 5L。
共有 206 名患者(54.9%为男性,平均年龄 35±11 岁)参与了这项研究。3L 组观察到 25 种独特的健康状态,而 5L 组观察到 59 种。整体天花板效应从 29.6%(3L)下降到 25.5%(5L)。绝对判别能力提高(平均香农指数为 0.84 比 1.18)。3L 与 EQ VAS 和 CDAI 评分相关性更强,而 5L 与 PDAI 评分相关性更强。5L 在年龄、肛周瘘管、肠外表现和残疾等方面具有更好的已知组有效性。
这是第一项使用 EQ-5D-5L 问卷报告 CD 对生活质量影响的研究。5L 在可行性、天花板效应、判别能力和已知组有效性方面似乎优于 3L。了解 3L 和 5L 在心理测量学方面的差异至关重要,因为它们对 CD 治疗的财务决策具有重要影响。