RTI International, Division for Applied Justice Research, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States of America.
Rulo Strategies, 1405 South Fern Street, Box 213, Arlington, VA 22202, United States of America.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Sep;140:108833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108833. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning to virtual court and treatment, and how this transition impacted their perceptions of the treatment court experience.
The National Center for State Courts administered an online survey between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021, deployed to state and local court administrators, which resulted in 1356 unique client responses from 121 courts. The survey measured attitudes about the treatment court process, including interactions with the judge, the behavioral health treatment staff, and treatment groups, as well as barriers to virtual and in-person court. We hypothesized that clients with fewer technological barriers to virtual service, who shifted to virtual court or treatment, would report more positive attitudes to this service delivery.
Clients felt more comfortable participating in virtual court sessions than in-person sessions but were less likely to feel like the judge was familiar with their case during virtual court sessions. From the treatment perspective, clients felt more connected with other group members and reported greater benefit from treatment staff when treatment services were delivered in-person, but clients felt less anxious when treatment groups were virtual.
Even though virtual experiences were more comfortable than in-person experiences for clients, the results are nuanced and show preference for some in-person connections as they transitioned to virtual connections. Future research should examine how to improve client connections with staff/group members during virtual court or treatment sessions, particularly as courts and treatment providers are likely to continue some services virtually into the future.
作为对 COVID-19 大流行的回应,许多治疗法院开始提供远程服务。我们试图研究客户在过渡到虚拟法庭和治疗时所面临的障碍,以及这种过渡如何影响他们对治疗法庭体验的看法。
国家州法院中心于 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 31 日期间向州和地方法院管理人员发放了在线调查,共收到来自 121 个法院的 1356 份客户回复。该调查衡量了客户对治疗法庭程序的态度,包括与法官、行为健康治疗人员和治疗小组的互动,以及虚拟和面对面法庭的障碍。我们假设,对虚拟服务技术障碍较少、转向虚拟法庭或治疗的客户,对这种服务提供方式的评价会更积极。
客户表示更愿意参加虚拟法庭会议而不是面对面会议,但在虚拟法庭会议期间,他们认为法官对他们的案件不太熟悉。从治疗角度来看,客户在治疗服务面对面提供时与其他小组成员的联系更紧密,并且报告治疗人员的治疗效果更好,但在治疗小组是虚拟时,客户的焦虑感较低。
尽管虚拟体验对客户来说比面对面体验更舒适,但结果是复杂的,显示出在过渡到虚拟联系时对某些面对面联系的偏好。未来的研究应该研究如何在虚拟法庭或治疗期间改善客户与工作人员/小组成员的联系,特别是因为法院和治疗提供者可能会在未来继续以虚拟方式提供一些服务。