Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Cortex. 2022 Sep;154:149-166. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
Visuospatial attention can either be voluntarily directed (endogenous/top-down attention) or automatically triggered (exogenous/bottom-up attention). Recent research showed that dorsal parietal transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at alpha frequency modulates the spatial attentional bias in an endogenous but not in an exogenous visuospatial attention task. Yet, the reason for this task-specificity remains unexplored. Here, we tested whether this dissociation relates to the proposed differential role of the dorsal attention network (DAN) and ventral attention network (VAN) in endogenous and exogenous attention processes respectively. To that aim, we targeted the left and right dorsal parietal node of the DAN, as well as the left and right ventral temporoparietal node of the VAN using tACS at the individual alpha frequency. Every participant completed all four stimulation conditions and a sham condition in five separate sessions. During tACS, we assessed the behavioral visuospatial attention bias via an endogenous and exogenous visuospatial attention task. Additionally, we measured offline alpha power immediately before and after tACS using electroencephalography (EEG). The behavioral data revealed an effect of tACS on the endogenous but not exogenous attention bias, with a greater leftward bias during (sham-corrected) left than right hemispheric stimulation. In line with our hypothesis, this effect was brain area-specific, i.e., present for dorsal parietal but not ventral temporoparietal tACS. However, contrary to our expectations, there was no effect of ventral temporoparietal tACS on the exogenous visuospatial attention bias. Hence, no double dissociation between the two targeted attention networks. There was no effect of either tACS condition on offline alpha power. Our behavioral data reveal that dorsal parietal but not ventral temporoparietal alpha oscillations steer endogenous visuospatial attention. This brain-area specific tACS effect matches the previously proposed dissociation between the DAN and VAN and, by showing that the spatial attention bias effect does not generalize to any lateral posterior tACS montage, renders lateral cutaneous and retinal effects for the spatial attention bias in the dorsal parietal condition unlikely. Yet the absence of tACS effects on the exogenous attention task suggests that ventral temporoparietal alpha oscillations are not functionally relevant for exogenous visuospatial attention. We discuss the potential implications of this finding in the context of an emerging theory on the role of the ventral temporoparietal node.
视空间注意力既可以是自主引导的(内源性/自上而下的注意力),也可以是自动触发的(外源性/自下而上的注意力)。最近的研究表明,背侧顶叶经颅交流电刺激(tACS)在 alpha 频率下调节内源性但不调节外源性视空间注意偏向。然而,这种任务特异性的原因仍未得到探索。在这里,我们测试了这种分离是否与背侧注意网络(DAN)和腹侧注意网络(VAN)在分别在内源性和外源性注意过程中的提出的差异作用有关。为此,我们使用针对 DAN 的左、右背侧顶叶节点和 VAN 的左、右腹侧颞顶叶节点的个体化 alpha 频率的 tACS。每个参与者在五个单独的会议中完成了所有四个刺激条件和一个假刺激条件。在 tACS 期间,我们通过内源性和外源性视空间注意任务评估行为视空间注意偏向。此外,我们使用脑电图(EEG)在 tACS 前后立即测量离线 alpha 功率。行为数据显示 tACS 对内源性但对外源性注意偏向有影响,在(校正后的)左半球刺激时,左偏大于右偏。与我们的假设一致,这种影响是脑区特异性的,即背侧顶叶 tACS 存在,但腹侧颞顶叶 tACS 不存在。然而,与我们的预期相反,腹侧颞顶叶 tACS 对外源性视空间注意偏向没有影响。因此,两个目标注意网络之间没有双重分离。两种 tACS 条件均未对离线 alpha 功率产生影响。我们的行为数据显示,背侧顶叶但不是腹侧颞顶叶的 alpha 振荡引导内源性视空间注意。这种脑区特异性 tACS 效应与先前提出的 DAN 和 VAN 之间的分离相匹配,并且通过表明空间注意偏向效应不会推广到任何外侧后部 tACS 组合,使得在背侧顶叶条件下,空间注意偏向的外侧皮肤和视网膜效应不太可能。然而,tACS 对外源性注意任务没有影响表明,腹侧颞顶叶的 alpha 振荡对外源性视空间注意没有功能相关性。我们在关于腹侧颞顶叶节点作用的新兴理论背景下讨论了这一发现的潜在意义。