Bayesian network analysis reveals the interplay of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk factors.

Clinical decision making regarding the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IA) benefits from a better understanding of the interplay of IA rupture risk factors. Probabilistic graphical models can capture and graphically display potentially causal relationships in a mechanistic model. In this study, Bayesian networks (BN) were used to estimate IA rupture risk factors influences. From 1248 IA patient records, a retrospective, single-cohort, patient-level data set with 9 phenotypic rupture risk factors (n=790 complete entries) was extracted. Prior knowledge together with score-based structure learning algorithms estimated rupture risk factor interactions. Two approaches, discrete and mixed-data additive BN, were implemented and compared. The corresponding graphs were learned using non-parametric bootstrapping and Markov chain Monte Carlo, respectively. The BN models were compared to standard descriptive and regression analysis methods. Correlation and regression analyses showed significant associations between IA rupture status and patient's sex, familial history of IA, age at IA diagnosis, IA location, IA size and IA multiplicity. BN models confirmed the findings from standard analysis methods. More precisely, they directly associated IA rupture with familial history of IA, IA size and IA location in a discrete framework. Additive model formulation, enabling mixed-data, found that IA rupture was directly influenced by patient age at diagnosis besides additional mutual influences of the risk factors. This study establishes a data-driven methodology for mechanistic disease modelling of IA rupture and shows the potential to direct clinical decision-making in IA treatment, allowing personalised prediction.