5330 Social Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C2, Canada.
University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;306:115099. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115099. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
Data from the early 2000s indicated worse overall health and larger socioeconomic (SES) health inequalities in the U.S. than in Canada. Yet, sociopolitical contexts, health levels, and SES-health inequalities have changed in both countries during the intervening two decades. Drawing on new data, we update the comparison of health levels and SES-health gradients between the two countries. Analyses, focused on self-rated health, are based on two complementary sets of data sources: Resilience and Recovery (RR) data, a harmonized U.S.-Canada survey of social conditions collected in 2020 (N = 3743); and a pair of leading nationally representative health data sources from each country: the National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS, N = 104,027) and the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS, N = 97,605), both collected in 2017-2018. Health levels and disparities, net of demographic and socioeconomic covariates, were estimated using modified Poisson models for relative comparisons; descriptives and predicted levels of fair/poor health show the comparisons from absolute perspective. Both data sources show that U.S. adults continue to have significantly worse health than Canadians; the disadvantage may be due to SES differences between the two populations. However, the two data sources yield conflicting findings on SES-health inequalities: the RR data indicate no difference between the two countries in socioeconomic health gradients, while the NHIS/CCHS data show a significantly steeper gradient in the U.S. than in Canada for both education and income. Canadian adults continue to report better health than their U.S. peers, but it is unclear whether health inequalities remain smaller as well. We discuss potential reasons for the conflicting findings and call for a large new cross-national data collection, which will enable scholars and policymakers to better understand health and wellbeing in the U.S. and Canadian contexts.
21 世纪初的数据表明,美国的整体健康状况和更大的社会经济(SES)健康不平等状况比加拿大差。然而,在过去的二十年中,这两个国家的社会政治环境、健康水平和 SES 健康不平等状况都发生了变化。利用新数据,我们更新了这两个国家的健康水平和 SES 健康梯度的比较。分析集中在自评健康上,基于两套互补的数据源:韧性和恢复(RR)数据,这是 2020 年收集的一项美国-加拿大社会状况的协调调查(N=3743);以及来自每个国家的一对领先的全国代表性健康数据源:国家健康访谈调查(NHIS,N=104027)和加拿大社区健康调查(CCHS,N=97605),均于 2017-2018 年收集。使用修正后的泊松模型估计健康水平和差异,以消除人口统计学和社会经济协变量的影响,相对比较采用相对比较模型;描述性和较差/较差健康的预测水平从绝对角度展示了比较。这两个数据源都表明,美国成年人的健康状况继续明显差于加拿大人;这种劣势可能是由于两个群体之间的 SES 差异造成的。然而,这两个数据源在 SES 健康不平等方面得出了相互矛盾的结论:RR 数据表明,在社会经济健康梯度方面,两国之间没有差异,而 NHIS/CCHS 数据表明,在美国,教育和收入的社会经济健康梯度都明显比加拿大陡峭。加拿大成年人继续报告比美国同龄人更好的健康状况,但尚不清楚健康不平等是否仍然更小。我们讨论了产生这些相互矛盾的结论的潜在原因,并呼吁进行一项新的大型跨国数据收集,这将使学者和政策制定者能够更好地了解美国和加拿大背景下的健康和幸福感。