Siddiqi Arjumand, Brown Rashida, Nguyen Quynh C, Loopstra Rachel, Kawachi Ichiro
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Room 566, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, US.
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 31;14:116. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0251-2.
Prior cross-national studies of socioeconomic inequalities in obesity have only compared summary indices of inequality but not specific, policy-relevant dimensions of inequality: (a) shape of the socioeconomic gradient in obesity, (b) magnitude of differentials in obesity across socioeconomic levels and, (c) level of obesity at any given socioeconomic level. We use unique data on two highly comparable societies - U.S. and Canada - to contrast each of these inequality dimensions.
Data came from the 2002/2003 Joint Canada/U.S. Survey of Health. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) for obesity (compared to normal weight) by income quintile and education group separately for both nations and, between Canadians and Americans in the same income or education group.
In the U.S., every socioeconomic group except the college educated had significant excess prevalence of obesity. By contrast in Canada, only those with less than high school were worse off, suggesting that the shape of the socioeconomic gradient differs in the two countries. U.S. differentials between socioeconomic levels were also larger than in Canada (e.g., PR quintile 1 compared to quintile 5 was 1.82 in the U.S. [95 % CI: 1.52-2.19] but 1.45 in Canada [95 % CI: 1.10-1.91]). At the lower end of the socioeconomic gradient, obesity was more prevalent in the U.S. than in Canada.
Our results suggest there is variation between U.S. and Canada in different dimensions of socioeconomic inequalities in obesity. Future research should examine a broader set of nations and test whether specific policies or environmental exposures can explain these differences.
先前关于肥胖方面社会经济不平等的跨国研究仅比较了不平等的汇总指标,而未涉及不平等的具体、与政策相关的维度:(a)肥胖方面社会经济梯度的形状,(b)社会经济水平之间肥胖差异的幅度,以及(c)任何给定社会经济水平下的肥胖程度。我们利用美国和加拿大这两个高度可比社会的独特数据,对这些不平等维度中的每一个进行对比。
数据来自2002/2003年加拿大/美国健康联合调查。我们分别计算了两国按收入五分位数和教育组划分的肥胖(与正常体重相比)的调整患病率比(APR),以及同一收入或教育组中加拿大人和美国人之间的调整患病率比。
在美国,除受过大学教育的人群外,每个社会经济群体的肥胖患病率都显著过高。相比之下,在加拿大,只有高中以下学历的人群情况更糟,这表明两国社会经济梯度的形状不同。美国社会经济水平之间的差异也大于加拿大(例如,美国第1五分位数与第5五分位数的PR为1.82 [95% CI:1.52 - 2.19],而加拿大为1.45 [95% CI:1.10 - 1.91])。在社会经济梯度的低端,美国的肥胖患病率高于加拿大。
我们的结果表明,美国和加拿大在肥胖方面社会经济不平等的不同维度上存在差异。未来的研究应考察更广泛的国家集合,并测试特定政策或环境暴露是否可以解释这些差异。