Sood A, Myers O, Tigges B, Domínguez N, Helitzer D
University of New Mexico & Arizona State University.
Chron Mentor Coach. 2021 Dec;5(14):383-389.
Organizational climate is the shared perception of and the meaning attached to the policies, practices, and procedures employees experience. University faculty can assess their organizational mentoring climate (OMC) using recently published, reliable, and valid OMC importance (OMCI) and availability (OMCA) scales. Factors affecting the OMC's importance and availability are, however, not known. By studying these factors, organizational leaders can determine whether and how to change the OMC to improve faculty mentoring outcomes. In this cross-sectional study, 300 faculty from the University of New Mexico (Main, Health Sciences Center [HSC] and branch campuses) and Arizona State University (a non-HSC campus) completed the online OMCI and OMCA scales, each with three subscales: Organizational Expectations, Mentor-Mentee Relationships, and Resources. OMCI scale items were rated from very unimportant (1) to very important (5); and, for OMCA, -1 (no), 0 (don't know), 1 (yes). The study used linear regression analysis after normalizing the scales to M=0 and SD=1. Although not explicitly targeted for recruitment, the respondents were predominantly women, non-Hispanic White, senior, tenure-track faculty members who were neither providing mentoring nor receiving mentoring. In the multivariable models, women faculty attached greater importance to mentoring climate components than men. HSC faculty and those receiving mentoring reported greater availability of mentoring climate components than their respective counterparts. Underrepresented minority (URM) faculty did not rate OMCI or OMCA differently than non-URM faculty. Faculty subgroups in this study attached varying levels of importance to the OMC and rated the availability of climate components differently. Factors impacting the importance of the OMC differed from those affecting the perceived availability of the climate components. Based on their relative importance and lack of availability, organizational leaders should create, modify and implement structures, programs, and policies to improve organizational mentoring expectations, mentor-mentee relationships, and mentoring resources, thereby strengthening their OMC.
组织氛围是员工对其所经历的政策、实践和程序的共同认知以及赋予这些的意义。大学教师可以使用最近发表的、可靠且有效的组织指导氛围(OMC)重要性(OMCI)和可得性(OMCA)量表来评估他们的组织指导氛围。然而,影响OMC重要性和可得性的因素尚不清楚。通过研究这些因素,组织领导者可以确定是否以及如何改变OMC以改善教师指导成果。在这项横断面研究中,来自新墨西哥大学(主校区、健康科学中心[HSC]和分校)以及亚利桑那州立大学(一个非HSC校区)的300名教师完成了在线OMCI和OMCA量表,每个量表都有三个子量表:组织期望、师徒关系和资源。OMCI量表项目的评分从非常不重要(1)到非常重要(5);对于OMCA,评分为-1(否)、0(不知道)、1(是)。在将量表标准化为M = 0和SD = 1后,该研究使用了线性回归分析。尽管没有明确针对特定人群进行招募,但受访者主要是女性、非西班牙裔白人、高级别的终身教职员工,他们既没有提供指导也没有接受指导。在多变量模型中,女性教师比男性教师更重视指导氛围的组成部分。HSC教师和接受指导的教师报告称,指导氛围组成部分的可得性比各自的对照组更高。代表性不足的少数族裔(URM)教师对OMCI或OMCA的评分与非URM教师没有差异。本研究中的教师亚组对OMC的重视程度各不相同,对氛围组成部分的可得性评分也不同。影响OMC重要性的因素与影响氛围组成部分感知可得性的因素不同。基于其相对重要性和可得性不足,组织领导者应创建、修改和实施结构、计划和政策,以改善组织指导期望、师徒关系和指导资源,从而加强他们的OMC。