A. Sood is professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico. B. Tigges is associate professor, University of New Mexico College of Nursing, Albuquerque, New Mexico. D. Helitzer is dean and professor, University of New Mexico College of Population Health, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Acad Med. 2016 Dec;91(12):1598-1600. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001264.
It has long been known that mentoring is critical to the success of junior faculty researchers. The controlled intervention study by Libby et al published in this issue of Academic Medicine demonstrates that institutional investment in a mentored research career development program for early-career faculty investigators provided significant long-term gains in grant productivity. Academic institutions hoping to replicate this program's success by launching similar mentoring programs for their junior faculty investigators will, however, find that the Achilles' heel lies in the scarcity of skilled research mentors and the relative lack of attention to and recognition of the importance of a supportive institutional climate for mentoring. It is essential, therefore, to begin by developing programs to "train the trainer" as well as programs and policies to support mentors. As a recent trial at 16 Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions demonstrated, competency-based, structured research mentor training can improve mentors' skills.In this Commentary, the authors offer a comprehensive two-pronged framework for mentor development with elements that address both individual mentoring competencies and the institutional climate for mentoring. The framework depicts the gaps, activities, and outcomes that a mentor development program can address. Activities directed at changing the institutional climate related to mentor development should complement training activities for individual mentors. The authors propose that employing this framework's approach to mentor development will lead to the desired impact: to increase the competence, productivity, and retention of a diverse clinical and translational research workforce.
长期以来,人们一直认为指导对于初级研究人员的成功至关重要。Libby 等人在本期《学术医学》上发表的对照干预研究表明,机构对早期职业研究人员的指导研究职业发展计划进行投资,可显著提高研究经费的长期产出。希望通过为初级研究人员推出类似的指导计划来复制该计划成功的学术机构将会发现,其薄弱环节在于缺乏熟练的研究导师,以及对支持指导的机构环境的重要性相对缺乏关注和认可。因此,必须首先制定“培训师培训”计划以及支持导师的计划和政策。正如最近在 16 个临床与转化科学奖机构进行的一项试验所示,基于能力的结构化研究导师培训可以提高导师的技能。在这篇评论中,作者提出了一个全面的双管齐下的导师发展框架,其中包含了针对个人导师能力和导师发展的机构环境的要素。该框架描绘了导师发展计划可以解决的差距、活动和结果。旨在改变与导师发展相关的机构环境的活动应补充针对个人导师的培训活动。作者提出,采用这种导师发展框架的方法将产生预期的效果:提高多元化临床和转化研究人员的能力、生产力和保留率。