Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情第一波和第二波期间住院患者感染趋势的比较:一项回顾性哨点监测研究。

Comparison of trends in infections in hospitalised patients during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective sentinel surveillance study.

作者信息

Vendrik Karuna E W, Baktash Amoe, Goeman Jelle J, Harmanus Céline, Notermans Daan W, de Greeff Sabine C, Kuijper Ed J

机构信息

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Aug;19:100424. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100424. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, several factors, such as improved hand hygiene, social distancing, and restricted hospital referral, may have had an influence on the epidemiology of infections (CDI).

METHODS

The annual CDI incidence rate of nine hospitals participating in the Dutch sentinel CI surveillance with complete data was compared between 2020 and the previous five surveillance years. Trends in characteristics of hospitalised CDI patients in 21-24 participating hospitals were compared between the first (March 13-May 12, 2020) or second Dutch COVID-19 wave (September 17, 2020-January 1, 2021) and the same calendar periods in 2015 through 2019. All analyses were adjusted for trend changes over time.

FINDINGS

The annual CDI incidence rate in 2020 was lower compared to previous years. During the second wave, the percentage of CDI patients with severe CDI was higher compared to earlier (25·8% in 2020 vs 17·9% in 2015-2019 (RR 1·6; 95%CI 1·1-2·3)). After adjustment for delayed diagnostics (≥8 days from start symptoms), the increase disappeared. Delayed diagnostics was indeed more common during the second wave (RR 1·7; 95%CI 1·1-2·6), but only for community-onset CDI (CO-CDI).

INTERPRETATION

This study shows that a higher percentage of severe CDI cases was observed during the second COVID-19 wave. This may partially be caused by delayed diagnostics, potentially due to decreased visits to a physician or restricted hospital referral for CO-CDI patients.

FUNDING

Dutch ministry of Health.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,一些因素,如手部卫生改善、社交距离措施以及医院转诊受限,可能对艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的流行病学产生了影响。

方法

比较了2020年与此前五个监测年份中,参与荷兰哨点艰难梭菌感染监测且数据完整的九家医院的年度CDI发病率。比较了2020年第一波(2020年3月13日至5月12日)或第二波荷兰新冠疫情期间(2020年9月17日至2021年1月1日)与2015年至2019年同期,21至24家参与医院中住院CDI患者的特征趋势。所有分析均针对随时间的趋势变化进行了调整。

研究结果

2020年的年度CDI发病率低于前几年。在第二波疫情期间,严重CDI患者的比例高于早期(2020年为25.8%,2015 - 2019年为17.9%(相对风险1.6;95%置信区间1.1 - 2.3))。在对延迟诊断(症状出现后≥8天)进行调整后,这种增加消失了。延迟诊断在第二波疫情期间确实更为常见(相对风险1.7;95%置信区间1.1 - 2.6),但仅针对社区获得性CDI(CO - CDI)。

解读

本研究表明,在第二波新冠疫情期间观察到严重CDI病例的比例更高。这可能部分是由于诊断延迟所致,可能是因为CO - CDI患者看医生的次数减少或医院转诊受限。

资金来源

荷兰卫生部。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f842/9417903/442fba72d3bb/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验