• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版简明认知障碍问卷在社区居住老年人中的心理测量特性和测量不变性。

Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Chinese Version of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

机构信息

Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:908827. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908827. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.908827
PMID:35784243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9247353/
Abstract

This study aimed to verify the Chinese version of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire (C-BASIC-Q), and provide a new tool for the future large-scale epidemiological investigation of cognitive function in China. From March to May 2021, a cross-sectional study of 2,144 Chinese community-dwelling older adults (men = 1,075, mean age = 72.01 years, = 6.96 years, ranging from 60-99 years) was conducted in Jinan. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to evaluate the factor structure of the C-BASIC-Q. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlations with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and retest correlations in a sub-sample ( = 129). Linear regression was used to analyze the impact of demographic factors on the MMSE and C-BASIC-Q scores. Measurement invariance was evaluated using a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. The mean C-BASIC-Q score was 15.94 ( = 3.43). Factor analysis suggested a three-factor structure of C-BASIC-Q (self-report, orientation, and informant report). The C-BASIC-Q score was significantly positively associated with the MMSE score, showing good convergent validity. Cronbach's alpha of the C-BASIC-Q was 0.862, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was significant ( = 0.952, < 0.001), indicating good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Measurement invariance analysis showed that C-BASIC-Q had configural, metric, and scalar invariance across sex, age, residence, education level and marital status. C-BASIC-Q was less affected by age, residence, education, and marital status than the MMSE. In summary, the C-BASIC-Q had good reliability, validity, and measurement invariance, and is a valid tool for evaluating cognitive functioning in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.

摘要

本研究旨在验证简体中文版Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire(C-BASIC-Q),并为未来在中国进行大规模认知功能的流行病学调查提供新工具。2021 年 3 月至 5 月,在济南进行了一项针对 2144 名中国社区居住的老年人(男性=1075 人,平均年龄=72.01 岁,标准差=6.96 岁,年龄范围为 60-99 岁)的横断面研究。采用探索性和验证性因子分析评估 C-BASIC-Q 的因子结构。采用与简易精神状态检查(MMSE)的相关性评估收敛效度。在一个子样本中(n=129),采用 Cronbach's alpha 和重测相关性评估内部一致性和重测信度。采用线性回归分析人口统计学因素对 MMSE 和 C-BASIC-Q 评分的影响。采用多组验证性因子分析评估测量不变性。C-BASIC-Q 的平均得分为 15.94(标准差=3.43)。因子分析提示 C-BASIC-Q 具有三因子结构(自我报告、定向和知情者报告)。C-BASIC-Q 评分与 MMSE 评分呈显著正相关,表明具有良好的收敛效度。C-BASIC-Q 的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.862,重测相关系数显著(=0.952,p<0.001),表明具有良好的内部一致性和重测信度。测量不变性分析表明,C-BASIC-Q 在性别、年龄、居住地、教育程度和婚姻状况方面具有构念、度量和标度不变性。与 MMSE 相比,C-BASIC-Q 受年龄、居住地、教育程度和婚姻状况的影响较小。综上所述,C-BASIC-Q 具有良好的信度、效度和测量不变性,是评估中国社区居住老年人认知功能的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Chinese Version of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.中文版简明认知障碍问卷在社区居住老年人中的心理测量特性和测量不变性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:908827. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908827. eCollection 2022.
2
Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and evaluation of its measurement invariance across sex.中文版本短肠病问卷的心理计量学验证及其在性别间测量不变性的评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Nov 7;19(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01890-x.
3
Reliability and validity of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (Chinese version) for stroke patients.脑卒中患者认知功能障碍简易评估量表(中文版)的信度和效度。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023 Jan-Feb;30(1):27-33. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1908287. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Electronic Health Literacy Scale-Web3.0 for Older Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases: Validation Study.电子健康素养量表-Web3.0 版:用于患有非传染性疾病的老年人的验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 3;26:e52457. doi: 10.2196/52457.
5
A longitudinal examination of the measurement properties and invariance of the Sleep Condition Indicator in Chinese healthcare students.一项对中国医学生睡眠状况指标测量特性和不变性的纵向研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05844-7.
6
Revision of brief health literacy assessment scale among the older adults and its reliability and validity test.老年人简易健康素养评估量表的修订及其信效度检验
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jan 28;48(1):123-129. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220011.
7
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer Scale (RCAC) for young female cancer survivors.癌症后生殖问题量表中文版(RCAC)在年轻女性癌症幸存者中的心理测量学特性。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Apr;25(4):1263-1270. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3519-1. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in China.中文版医疗结局研究艾滋病毒健康调查(MOS-HIV)在我国 HIV 感染者/艾滋病患者(PLWHA)中的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 25;13(7):e0201177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201177. eCollection 2018.
9
The empathy questionnaire for children and adolescents (EmQue-CA) in Chinese: Psychometric properties and measurement invariance.《儿童和青少年同理心问卷(EmQue-CA)中文版:心理测量学特性和测量不变性》
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Sep;63:102775. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102775. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Explaining the Association Between Number of Teeth and Frailty in Older Chinese Adults: The Chain Mediating Effect of Nutritional Status and Cognitive Function.解析中国老年人牙齿数量与衰弱之间的关联:营养状况和认知功能的链式中介作用
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e70001. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70001.
2
Ten-words recall test: an effective tool to differentiate mild cognitive impairment from subjective cognitive decline.十词回忆测试:区分轻度认知障碍与主观认知衰退的有效工具。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 11;15:1429934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1429934. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (Chinese version) for stroke patients.脑卒中患者认知功能障碍简易评估量表(中文版)的信度和效度。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023 Jan-Feb;30(1):27-33. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1908287. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Cognitive impairment and its risk factors among Myanmar elderly using the Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale: A cross-sectional study in Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.使用修订版长谷川痴呆量表评估缅甸老年人的认知障碍及其危险因素:缅甸内比都的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236656. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparative Study of Two Short-Form Versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for Screening of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in a Chinese Population.两种简短版蒙特利尔认知评估量表在筛查中国人群脑卒中后认知障碍的比较研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jun 18;15:907-914. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S248856. eCollection 2020.
4
Brief Cognitive Tests Used in Primary Care Cannot Accurately Differentiate Mild Cognitive Impairment from Subjective Cognitive Decline.在初级保健中使用的简短认知测试无法准确地区分轻度认知障碍与主观认知下降。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;75(4):1191-1201. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191191.
5
A comparative study on the validations of three cognitive screening tests in identifying subtle cognitive decline.三种认知筛查测试在识别轻度认知衰退方面的验证比较研究。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Mar 5;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01657-9.
6
Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire (BASIC-Q)-Development and validation of a new tool for identification of cognitive impairment in community settings.简要认知损伤问卷(BASIC-Q)——一种用于识别社区环境中认知障碍的新工具的开发和验证。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;35(7):693-701. doi: 10.1002/gps.5286. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
7
Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.老年人认知障碍筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):757-763. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0435.
8
Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.老年人认知障碍筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):764-785. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22258.
9
Changes in Cognitive Function and Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment of the Elderly in China: 2005-2014.中国老年人认知功能变化及认知障碍的危险因素:2005-2014 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;16(16):2847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162847.
10
Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC)-Validation of a new dementia case-finding instrument integrating cognitive assessment with patient and informant report.简要认知评估(BASIC)-一种新的痴呆症病例发现工具的验证,该工具将认知评估与患者和知情者报告相结合。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;34(11):1724-1733. doi: 10.1002/gps.5188. Epub 2019 Aug 19.