• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简要认知损伤问卷(BASIC-Q)——一种用于识别社区环境中认知障碍的新工具的开发和验证。

Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire (BASIC-Q)-Development and validation of a new tool for identification of cognitive impairment in community settings.

机构信息

Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;35(7):693-701. doi: 10.1002/gps.5286. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1002/gps.5286
PMID:32100328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7383627/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC), which combines self- and informant report with cognitive testing, was previously found to be highly accurate in identification of dementia and cognitive impairment. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a questionnaire version of BASIC, the BASIC-Q, for use in community settings.

METHODS

In order to construct a questionnaire version of BASIC, we substituted cognitive testing with questions regarding orientation. BASIC-Q was validated based on further analysis of data from the primary BASIC validation study, where patients consecutively referred from general practice were tested at their first memory clinic admission prior to diagnosis. Control participants were primarily recruited among participating patients' relatives. Expert clinical diagnosis was subsequently used as reference standard for estimation of classification accuracy.

RESULTS

A high discriminative validity (sensitivity 0.92, specificity 0.97) for cognitive impairment (n = 159) vs socio-demographically matched control participants (n = 109) was found. In comparison, the MMSE had 0.76 sensitivity and 0.81 specificity. Administration time for BASIC-Q was less than 5 minutes compared to approximately 10 minutes for the MMSE.

CONCLUSIONS

BASIC-Q is a brief, efficient and valid tool for identification of cognitive impairment in a clinical setting. Further validation in a community setting is needed.

摘要

目的

简要认知评估(BASIC)结合了自我报告和知情者报告以及认知测试,先前已被证实可高度准确地识别痴呆和认知障碍。本研究的目的是开发和验证 BASIC 的问卷版本,即 BASIC-Q,以便在社区环境中使用。

方法

为了构建 BASIC 的问卷版本,我们用有关定向的问题替代了认知测试。BASIC-Q 的验证是基于对主要 BASIC 验证研究数据的进一步分析,在该研究中,患者在首次记忆诊所就诊时被连续从普通诊所转诊,以便在诊断前进行测试。对照组主要从参与的患者的亲属中招募。随后,使用专家临床诊断作为参考标准来评估分类准确性。

结果

对于认知障碍(n = 159)与社会人口统计学匹配的对照组参与者(n = 109),BASIC-Q 具有较高的判别有效性(敏感性 0.92,特异性 0.97)。相比之下,MMSE 的敏感性为 0.76,特异性为 0.81。BASIC-Q 的管理时间不到 5 分钟,而 MMSE 则需要大约 10 分钟。

结论

BASIC-Q 是一种在临床环境中识别认知障碍的简短、高效和有效的工具。需要在社区环境中进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5e/7383627/579cb85df753/GPS-35-693-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5e/7383627/579cb85df753/GPS-35-693-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5e/7383627/579cb85df753/GPS-35-693-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire (BASIC-Q)-Development and validation of a new tool for identification of cognitive impairment in community settings.简要认知损伤问卷(BASIC-Q)——一种用于识别社区环境中认知障碍的新工具的开发和验证。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;35(7):693-701. doi: 10.1002/gps.5286. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
2
Validation of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition and the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire for identification of mild cognitive impairment in a memory clinic setting.在记忆门诊环境中,用于识别轻度认知障碍的简短认知损伤评估和简短认知损伤问卷的验证。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;35(8):907-915. doi: 10.1002/gps.5312. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
3
Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC)-Validation of a new dementia case-finding instrument integrating cognitive assessment with patient and informant report.简要认知评估(BASIC)-一种新的痴呆症病例发现工具的验证,该工具将认知评估与患者和知情者报告相结合。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;34(11):1724-1733. doi: 10.1002/gps.5188. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of BASIC-Q for detection of cognitive impairment in a primary care setting - a cross-validation study.BASIC-Q 在基层医疗环境中检测认知障碍的诊断准确性 - 一项交叉验证研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 11;24(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04675-1.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition case-finding instrument in a general practice setting and comparison with other widely used brief cognitive tests-a cross-validation study.在一般实践环境中,Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition 病例发现工具的诊断准确性,及其与其他广泛使用的简短认知测试的比较——一项交叉验证研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Oct;31(10):e16418. doi: 10.1111/ene.16418. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
6
Validity of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition case-finding instrument for identification of dementia subgroups and staging of dementia.认知障碍简明筛查工具对痴呆亚组识别和痴呆分期的有效性。
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Mar;30(3):578-586. doi: 10.1111/ene.15636. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
7
8
The validation of the Italian version of the GPCOG (GPCOG-It): a contribution to cross-national implementation of a screening test for dementia in general practice.意大利版 GPCOG(GPCOG-It)的验证:在一般实践中进行痴呆症筛查测试的跨国实施的贡献。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Feb;22(1):82-90. doi: 10.1017/S104161020999113X. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
9
How valid are subjective ratings of prospective memory in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia?在轻度认知障碍和早期痴呆中,前瞻性记忆的主观评分有多有效?
Gerontology. 2015;61(3):251-7. doi: 10.1159/000371347. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly individuals in screening mild cognitive impairment with or without functional impairment.简易认知功能衰退量表在伴有或不伴有功能损害的轻度认知障碍筛查中的应用:知情者问卷。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2012 Dec;25(4):227-32. doi: 10.1177/0891988712464822. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic test accuracy of self-administered cognitive assessment tools for dementia.用于痴呆症的自我管理认知评估工具的诊断测试准确性
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD013725. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013725.pub2.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition case-finding instrument in a general practice setting and comparison with other widely used brief cognitive tests-a cross-validation study.在一般实践环境中,Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition 病例发现工具的诊断准确性,及其与其他广泛使用的简短认知测试的比较——一项交叉验证研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Oct;31(10):e16418. doi: 10.1111/ene.16418. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC)-Validation of a new dementia case-finding instrument integrating cognitive assessment with patient and informant report.简要认知评估(BASIC)-一种新的痴呆症病例发现工具的验证,该工具将认知评估与患者和知情者报告相结合。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;34(11):1724-1733. doi: 10.1002/gps.5188. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
2
The Validity of the Norwegian Version of the Cognitive Function Instrument.挪威版认知功能量表的效度
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2018;46(3-4):217-228. doi: 10.1159/000493463. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
The Utility of the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) to Detect Cognitive Decline in Non-Demented Older Adults.
Diagnostic accuracy of BASIC-Q for detection of cognitive impairment in a primary care setting - a cross-validation study.
BASIC-Q 在基层医疗环境中检测认知障碍的诊断准确性 - 一项交叉验证研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 11;24(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04675-1.
4
Cognitive Assessment in Culturally, Linguistically, and Educationally Diverse Older Populations in Europe.认知评估在文化、语言和教育多样化的欧洲老年人群体中。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2022 Jan-Dec;37:15333175221117006. doi: 10.1177/15333175221117006.
5
Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Chinese Version of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.中文版简明认知障碍问卷在社区居住老年人中的心理测量特性和测量不变性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:908827. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908827. eCollection 2022.
6
When Movement Moves: Study Protocol for a Multi-Method Pre/Post Evaluation Study of Two Programmes; the Danish Team Twin and Cycling Without Age.当运动在进行时:对丹麦团队双胞胎和无龄骑自行车两个项目的前后评估的多方法研究方案
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 23;18(19):10008. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910008.
7
Validation of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition and the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire for identification of mild cognitive impairment in a memory clinic setting.在记忆门诊环境中,用于识别轻度认知障碍的简短认知损伤评估和简短认知损伤问卷的验证。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;35(8):907-915. doi: 10.1002/gps.5312. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
认知功能量表(CFI)在检测非痴呆老年人认知衰退方面的效用。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(2):427-437. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161294.
4
Tracking early decline in cognitive function in older individuals at risk for Alzheimer disease dementia: the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Cognitive Function Instrument.追踪有患阿尔茨海默病痴呆风险的老年人认知功能的早期衰退:阿尔茨海默病协作研究认知功能量表
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Apr;72(4):446-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3375.
5
BrainCheck - a very brief tool to detect incipient cognitive decline: optimized case-finding combining patient- and informant-based data.脑检查 - 一种非常简短的工具,用于检测初期认知能力下降:优化病例发现,结合患者和知情人的数据。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Nov 24;6(9):69. doi: 10.1186/s13195-014-0069-y. eCollection 2014.
6
Validation of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.验证 Addenbrooke's 认知测验 III 在额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病中的应用。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;36(3-4):242-50. doi: 10.1159/000351671. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
7
The MMSE orientation for time domain is a strong predictor of subsequent cognitive decline in the elderly.MMSE 时间域定向是老年人随后认知能力下降的强有力预测指标。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;24(12):1429-37. doi: 10.1002/gps.2282.
8
Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities.贝叶斯定理与神经心理学中的诊断测试:测试后概率的区间估计
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;23(4):624-44. doi: 10.1080/13854040802524229. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
9
Dementia undiagnosed in poor older adults with functional impairment.功能受损的贫困老年人中未被诊断出的痴呆症。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1771-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01417.x. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
10
Implementing a screening and diagnosis program for dementia in primary care.在初级保健中实施痴呆症筛查与诊断项目。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jul;20(7):572-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0126.x.