• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进身体活动的社区环境影响:一项自然实验研究方案。

Physical Activity Impacts of an Activity-Friendly Community: A Natural Experiment Study Protocol.

机构信息

Department of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

Center for Health Systems & Design, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;10:929331. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.929331. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.929331
PMID:35784244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9240399/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stakeholders from multiple sectors are increasingly aware of the critical need for identifying sustainable interventions that promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. Activity-friendly communities (AFCs) have been known to provide opportunities for engaging in physical activity (PA) across the life course, which is a key to healthy living and healthy aging.

PURPOSE

Our purpose is to describe the study protocol developed for a research project that examines: (a) the short- and long-term changes in total levels and spatial and temporal patterns of PA after individuals move from non-AFCs to an AFC; and (b) what built and natural environmental factors lead to changes in PA resulting from such a move, either directly or indirectly (e.g., by affecting psychosocial factors related to PA).

METHODS

This protocol is for a longitudinal, case-comparison study utilizing a unique natural experiment opportunity in Austin, Texas, USA. Case participants were those adults who moved from non-AFCs to an AFC. Matching comparison participants were residents from similar non-AFCs who did not move during the study period. Recruitment venues included local businesses, social and print media, community events, and individual referrals. Objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous PA and associated spatial and temporal patterns served as the key outcomes of interest. Independent (e.g., physical environments), confounding (e.g., demographic factors), and mediating variables (e.g., psychosocial factors) were captured using a combination of objective (e.g., GIS, GPS, Tanita scale) and subjective measures (e.g., survey, travel diary). Statistical analyses will be conducted using multiple methods, including difference-in-differences models, repeated-measures linear mixed models, hierarchical marked space-time Poisson point pattern analysis, and hierarchical linear mixed models.

CONCLUSION

Natural experiment studies help investigate causal relationships between health and place. However, multiple challenges associated with participant recruitment, extensive and extended data collection activities, and unpredictable intervention schedules have discouraged many researchers from implementing such studies in community-based populations. This detailed study protocol will inform the execution of future studies to explore how AFCs impact population health across the life course.

摘要

背景

越来越多的来自多个领域的利益相关者意识到,迫切需要确定可持续的干预措施,以促进健康的生活方式行为。适宜活动社区(AFC)被认为提供了贯穿整个生命周期进行身体活动(PA)的机会,这是健康生活和健康老龄化的关键。

目的

我们的目的是描述为一个研究项目制定的研究方案,该项目旨在研究:(a)个人从非 AFC 转移到 AFC 后,PA 的总水平以及时空模式的短期和长期变化;(b)哪些建筑和自然环境因素直接或间接导致 PA 的变化(例如,通过影响与 PA 相关的心理社会因素)。

方法

本方案是一项针对美国德克萨斯州奥斯汀市的一项纵向病例对照研究,利用独特的自然实验机会。病例参与者是那些从非 AFC 转移到 AFC 的成年人。匹配的对照组参与者是在研究期间没有搬家的来自类似非 AFC 的居民。招募地点包括当地企业、社交和印刷媒体、社区活动和个人推荐。作为主要关注的关键结果,测量了客观的中等到剧烈的 PA 及其相关的时空模式。使用客观(例如,GIS、GPS、Tanita 秤)和主观测量(例如,调查、旅行日记)来捕获独立(例如,物理环境)、混杂(例如,人口统计学因素)和中介变量(例如,心理社会因素)。将使用多种方法进行统计分析,包括差异中的差异模型、重复测量线性混合模型、分层标记时空泊松点模式分析和分层线性混合模型。

结论

自然实验研究有助于调查健康与地点之间的因果关系。然而,与参与者招募、广泛和扩展的数据收集活动以及不可预测的干预计划相关的多个挑战,使许多研究人员不愿在基于社区的人群中实施此类研究。本详细的研究方案将为未来研究提供信息,以探讨 AFC 如何影响整个生命周期的人群健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/9240399/345cee5d3491/fpubh-10-929331-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/9240399/154922c66537/fpubh-10-929331-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/9240399/5121d6dacadd/fpubh-10-929331-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/9240399/345cee5d3491/fpubh-10-929331-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/9240399/154922c66537/fpubh-10-929331-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/9240399/5121d6dacadd/fpubh-10-929331-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dd9/9240399/345cee5d3491/fpubh-10-929331-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Physical Activity Impacts of an Activity-Friendly Community: A Natural Experiment Study Protocol.促进身体活动的社区环境影响:一项自然实验研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;10:929331. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.929331. eCollection 2022.
2
Moving to an Activity-Friendly Community Can Increase Physical Activity.搬到一个适宜活动的社区可以增加身体活动量。
J Phys Act Health. 2023 Aug 18;20(11):1058-1066. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2023-0045. Print 2023 Nov 1.
3
Capturing how age-friendly communities foster positive health, social participation and health equity: a study protocol of key components and processes that promote population health in aging Canadians.记录年龄友好型社区如何促进积极健康、社会参与和健康公平:一项关于促进加拿大老年人人口健康的关键组成部分和过程的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4392-7.
4
Protocol for an evaluation of the Designing Communities to Support Healthy Living in Aging Residents Study.《设计社区以支持老年居民健康生活研究》评估方案
Arch Public Health. 2021 Oct 7;79(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00691-4.
5
Engaging diverse midlife and older adults in a multilevel participatory physical activity intervention: evaluating impacts using Ripple Effects Mapping.让不同年龄段和不同背景的中年人及老年人参与多层次参与式身体活动干预:使用涟漪效应映射评估影响。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Sep 12;13(9):666-674. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad018.
6
Study protocol: healthy urban living and ageing in place (HULAP): an international, mixed methods study examining the associations between physical activity, built and social environments for older adults the UK and Brazil.研究方案:健康城市生活与原地老龄化(HULAP):一项国际混合方法研究,旨在探讨英国和巴西老年人的身体活动、建筑和社会环境之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):1135. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6018-0.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis.社区居住老年人跌倒及跌倒相关伤害的预防:一项基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(2):1-78. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
9
10
Toward the development of a vibrant, super-aged society: The future of medicine and society in Japan.迈向充满活力的超老龄社会:日本的医学与社会的未来。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Aug;21(8):601-613. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14201. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The alarming rise of lifestyle diseases and their impact on public health: A comprehensive overview and strategies for overcoming the epidemic.生活方式疾病的惊人增长及其对公众健康的影响:全面概述与应对这一流行病的策略。
J Res Med Sci. 2025 Jan 30;30:1. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_54_24. eCollection 2025.
2
Walkability Versus Livability: Changes in Neighborhood Satisfaction After Relocation to a Walkable, Mixed-Income Community in Austin, Texas.可步行性与宜居性:搬迁至德克萨斯州奥斯汀市一个可步行的混合收入社区后邻里满意度的变化
HERD. 2025 Apr;18(2):343-361. doi: 10.1177/19375867251317238. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
The intersection of health and housing: Analysis of the research portfolios of the National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

本文引用的文献

1
Walkable communities: Impacts on residents' physical and social health: Researchers from Texas A&M University studied residents in a newly developed 'walkable community' in Austin, Texas to see how it changed their habits for physical activity and whether it increased social interaction and cohesion in the community.适宜步行的社区:对居民身体和社会健康的影响:德克萨斯农工大学的研究人员对德克萨斯州奥斯汀一个新开发的“适宜步行的社区”的居民进行了研究,以了解该社区如何改变他们的体育活动习惯,以及是否增强了社区内的社交互动与凝聚力。
World Health Des. 2013 Jul;6(3):68-75.
2
A new transdisciplinary research model to investigate and improve the health of the public.一种新的跨学科研究模式,旨在调查和改善公众健康。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Apr 15;36(2):481-492. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa125.
3
卫生与住房的交集:对美国国立卫生研究院、疾病控制与预防中心和美国住房和城市发展部研究组合的分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 29;19(1):e0296996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296996. eCollection 2024.
Physical Activity and Healthy Aging.体力活动与健康老龄化。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2020 Nov;36(4):671-683. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Creating Built Environments That Expand Active Transportation and Active Living Across the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.创建促进美国积极交通和积极生活的建成环境:美国心脏协会的政策声明。
Circulation. 2020 Sep 15;142(11):e167-e183. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000878. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
The epidemiology of obesity.肥胖症的流行病学。
Metabolism. 2019 Mar;92:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
6
Moving to an active lifestyle? A systematic review of the effects of residential relocation on walking, physical activity and travel behaviour.迁往积极的生活方式?住宅迁移对步行、身体活动和出行行为影响的系统评价。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;52(12):789-799. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098833.
7
The Effectiveness of Urban Design and Land Use and Transport Policies and Practices to Increase Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.城市设计、土地利用及交通政策与实践对增加身体活动的有效性:一项系统综述
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S55-S76. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s55.
8
Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years.25年间195个国家超重和肥胖对健康的影响
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
9
Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research.自然实验:方法、途径及其对公共卫生干预研究贡献的概述
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:39-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
Difference-in-Differences Method in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Utility with Unbalanced Groups.比较效果研究中的差异-差异法:在不平衡组中的效用
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Aug;14(4):419-429. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0249-y.