Suppr超能文献

使用5号弧抗原的对流免疫电泳法用于包虫病的快速诊断及与间接血凝试验的比较。

Counterimmunoelectrophoresis using an arc 5 antigen for the rapid diagnosis of hydatidosis and comparison with the indirect hemagglutination test.

作者信息

Hira P R, Shweiki H M, Siboo R, Behbehani K

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987 May;36(3):592-7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1987.36.592.

Abstract

A modified counterimmunoelectrophoresis and a conventional indirect hemagglutination test were compared for routine diagnosis of human hydatid disease in an endemic area in the Middle East. Counterimmunoelectrophoresis was performed on a cellulose acetate membrane with dilutions of a commercially available antigen which interacts with sera of patients with confirmed hydatid disease to produce the arc 5 precipitin line. The test was performed with unconcentrated human sera and the lines stained in an aqueous solution of Ponceau red. Sensitivity (95.5% vs. 93.2%) and specificity (99.2% vs. 89.9%) were higher with counterimmunoelectrophoresis than with indirect hemagglutination. Cross-reactivity with sera of patients with other parasitic infections was noted with indirect hemagglutination but not with counterimmunoelectrophoresis. There was no cross-reactivity with sera of patients with autoimmune disorders by either test.

摘要

在中东的一个地方病区,对改良的对流免疫电泳法和传统的间接血凝试验进行了比较,以用于人体包虫病的常规诊断。对流免疫电泳在醋酸纤维素膜上进行,使用市售抗原的稀释液,该抗原与确诊为包虫病患者的血清相互作用,产生5号沉淀弧线。该试验使用未浓缩的人血清进行,沉淀线在丽春红水溶液中染色。对流免疫电泳的敏感性(95.5%对93.2%)和特异性(99.2%对89.9%)高于间接血凝试验。间接血凝试验发现与其他寄生虫感染患者的血清有交叉反应,而对流免疫电泳则没有。两种试验与自身免疫性疾病患者的血清均无交叉反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验