Hira P R, Shweiki H M, Siboo R, Behbehani K
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987 May;36(3):592-7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1987.36.592.
A modified counterimmunoelectrophoresis and a conventional indirect hemagglutination test were compared for routine diagnosis of human hydatid disease in an endemic area in the Middle East. Counterimmunoelectrophoresis was performed on a cellulose acetate membrane with dilutions of a commercially available antigen which interacts with sera of patients with confirmed hydatid disease to produce the arc 5 precipitin line. The test was performed with unconcentrated human sera and the lines stained in an aqueous solution of Ponceau red. Sensitivity (95.5% vs. 93.2%) and specificity (99.2% vs. 89.9%) were higher with counterimmunoelectrophoresis than with indirect hemagglutination. Cross-reactivity with sera of patients with other parasitic infections was noted with indirect hemagglutination but not with counterimmunoelectrophoresis. There was no cross-reactivity with sera of patients with autoimmune disorders by either test.
在中东的一个地方病区,对改良的对流免疫电泳法和传统的间接血凝试验进行了比较,以用于人体包虫病的常规诊断。对流免疫电泳在醋酸纤维素膜上进行,使用市售抗原的稀释液,该抗原与确诊为包虫病患者的血清相互作用,产生5号沉淀弧线。该试验使用未浓缩的人血清进行,沉淀线在丽春红水溶液中染色。对流免疫电泳的敏感性(95.5%对93.2%)和特异性(99.2%对89.9%)高于间接血凝试验。间接血凝试验发现与其他寄生虫感染患者的血清有交叉反应,而对流免疫电泳则没有。两种试验与自身免疫性疾病患者的血清均无交叉反应。