• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吡格列酮在澳大利亚和英国的使用情况,以及药物安全警告发布后膀胱癌风险的变化:一项中断时间序列研究。

Pioglitazone use in Australia and the United Kingdom following drug safety advisories on bladder cancer risk: An interrupted time series study.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

Charles Perkins Centre and School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Oct;31(10):1039-1045. doi: 10.1002/pds.5508. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1002/pds.5508
PMID:35790047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9546180/
Abstract

PURPOSE

National regulators in Australia and the United Kingdom issued safety advisories on the association between pioglitazone use and bladder cancer in July 2011. The Australian advisory noted that males were at higher risk of bladder cancer than females, while the UK advisory highlighted a new recommendation, suggest careful consideration in the elderly due to increasing risk with age. This study examined whether these differences in the advisories had different age- and sex-based impacts in each country.

METHODS

Interrupted time series analysis was used to compare pioglitazone use (prescriptions/100000 population) in Australia and the United Kingdom for the 24 months before and 11 months after the July 2011 safety advisories (study period July 2009-June 2012). Separate models were used to compare use by sex and age group (≥65 years vs. <65 years) in each country.

RESULTS

Pioglitazone use fell in Australia (17%) and the United Kingdom (24%) following the safety advisories. Use of pioglitazone fell more for males (18%) than females (16%) in Australia, and more for females (25%) than males (23%) in the United Kingdom; however, neither difference was statistically significant (Australia p = 0.445, United Kingdom p = 0.462). Pioglitazone use fell to a similar extent among older people than younger people in the United Kingdom (23% vs. 26%, p = 0.354), and did not differ between age groups in Australia (both 18%, p = 0.772).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that differences in the Australian and UK safety advisories resulted in substantial reductions in pioglitazone use at the population level in both countries, however, differences by sub-groups were not observed.

摘要

目的

澳大利亚和英国的国家监管机构于 2011 年 7 月发布了关于吡格列酮使用与膀胱癌之间关联的安全性公告。澳大利亚的公告指出,男性患膀胱癌的风险高于女性,而英国的公告则强调了一项新建议,即由于年龄增长风险增加,建议老年人谨慎考虑。本研究考察了这些公告中的差异在两国是否具有不同的年龄和性别影响。

方法

使用中断时间序列分析比较了 2011 年 7 月安全公告前后 24 个月(研究期间为 2009 年 7 月至 2012 年 6 月)澳大利亚和英国的吡格列酮使用量(每 10 万人的处方数)。分别使用两国的性别和年龄组(≥65 岁与<65 岁)的单独模型进行比较。

结果

在发布安全公告后,澳大利亚(17%)和英国(24%)的吡格列酮使用量下降。在澳大利亚,男性(18%)的吡格列酮使用量下降幅度大于女性(16%),而在英国,女性(25%)的吡格列酮使用量下降幅度大于男性(23%);然而,这些差异均无统计学意义(澳大利亚 p=0.445,英国 p=0.462)。在英国,老年人与年轻人相比,吡格列酮的使用量下降幅度相似(23%比 26%,p=0.354),而在澳大利亚,两个年龄组之间无差异(均为 18%,p=0.772)。

结论

结果表明,澳大利亚和英国安全公告中的差异导致两国人口水平的吡格列酮使用量大幅减少,但未观察到亚组之间的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e2/9546180/438fb8c346c6/PDS-31-1039-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e2/9546180/99652acb015e/PDS-31-1039-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e2/9546180/a8fafa9e57ab/PDS-31-1039-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e2/9546180/438fb8c346c6/PDS-31-1039-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e2/9546180/99652acb015e/PDS-31-1039-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e2/9546180/a8fafa9e57ab/PDS-31-1039-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e2/9546180/438fb8c346c6/PDS-31-1039-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Pioglitazone use in Australia and the United Kingdom following drug safety advisories on bladder cancer risk: An interrupted time series study.吡格列酮在澳大利亚和英国的使用情况,以及药物安全警告发布后膀胱癌风险的变化:一项中断时间序列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Oct;31(10):1039-1045. doi: 10.1002/pds.5508. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes: retrospective cohort study using datasets from four European countries.吡格列酮的使用与2型糖尿病患者膀胱癌风险:利用四个欧洲国家数据集的回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2016 Aug 16;354:i3903. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3903.
3
A descriptive analysis of medicines safety advisories issued by national medicines regulators in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States - 2007 to 2016.对澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和美国国家药品监管机构发布的药品安全警戒通告进行的描述性分析 - 2007 年至 2016 年。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1054-1063. doi: 10.1002/pds.5072. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer: population based cohort study.吡格列酮的使用与膀胱癌风险:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2016 Mar 30;352:i1541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1541.
5
Association between longer therapy with thiazolidinediones and risk of bladder cancer: a cohort study.噻唑烷二酮类药物治疗时间延长与膀胱癌风险的关系:一项队列研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Sep 19;104(18):1411-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs328. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
6
Comparative safety of pioglitazone versus clinically meaningful treatment alternatives concerning the risk of bladder cancer in older US adults with type 2 diabetes.比较吡格列酮与临床相关治疗选择在老年美国 2 型糖尿病患者膀胱癌风险方面的安全性。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):129-140. doi: 10.1111/dom.13049. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
7
Utilisation trends of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in Australia before and after safety warnings.罗格列酮和吡格列酮在澳大利亚发布安全警告前后的使用趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 4;14:151. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-151.
8
Global Versus Indian Perspective of Pioglitazone-induced Adverse Drug Reactions Including Bladder Cancer: A Comparative Retrospective Pharmacovigilance Analysis.吡格列酮引起的不良反应(包括膀胱癌)的全球与印度观点:一项比较回顾性药物警戒分析。
Clin Ther. 2019 Nov;41(11):2252-2262. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.08.018. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
9
Study design choices for evaluating the comparative safety of diabetes medications: An evaluation of pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer in older US adults with type-2 diabetes.研究设计选择评估糖尿病药物比较安全性:评估吡格列酮在老年美国 2 型糖尿病患者中的使用与膀胱癌风险。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Sep;21(9):2096-2106. doi: 10.1111/dom.13774. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
10
Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study.吡格列酮的监管影响对印度医生开处抗糖尿病药物的影响:一项基于多中心问卷的观察性研究。
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Oct;146(4):468-475. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1416_15.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety Warnings on the Same Harmful Effects of Medicines: A Comparison of Four National Regulators.药品相同有害效应的安全警示:四个国家监管机构的比较
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00573-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the 2014 coinsurance rate revision for the elderly on healthcare resource utilization in Japan.2014年日本老年人共付保险费率修订对医疗资源利用的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Jul 6;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00324-0.
2
Effect of relaxing hepatitis C treatment restrictions on direct-acting antiviral use in a Medicaid program: an interrupted time series analysis.放宽医疗补助计划中丙型肝炎治疗限制对直接作用抗病毒药物使用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jul;27(7):856-864. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.7.856.
3
The impact of a co-payment increase on the consumption of type 2 antidiabetics - A nationwide interrupted time series analysis.
共付额增加对 2 型抗糖尿病药物消费的影响——一项全国范围的中断时间序列分析。
Health Policy. 2021 Sep;125(9):1166-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Postmarket Safety Communication for Protection of Public Health: A Comparison of Regulatory Policy in Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States.上市后安全通讯以保护公众健康:澳大利亚、加拿大、欧盟和美国的监管政策比较。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;109(6):1424-1442. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2010. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
5
Prescribing trend of pioglitazone after safety warning release in Korea.韩国发布安全性警告后吡格列酮的处方趋势。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Nov 1;25(11):e342-e348.
6
Comparative Analysis of Medicines Safety Advisories Released by Australia, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom.比较分析澳大利亚、加拿大、美国和英国发布的药品安全警示。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):982-984. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0294.
7
Time trends and geographical variation in prescribing of drugs for diabetes in England from 1998 to 2017.1998 年至 2017 年英格兰糖尿病药物处方的时间趋势和地域差异。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2159-2168. doi: 10.1111/dom.13346. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
8
The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data collection: a practical guide for researchers.澳大利亚药品福利计划数据收集:研究人员实用指南
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 2;8:634. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1616-8.
9
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
10
How Did Multiple FDA Actions Affect the Utilization and Reimbursed Costs of Thiazolidinediones in US Medicaid?美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的多项行动如何影响噻唑烷二酮类药物在美国医疗补助计划中的使用情况及报销费用?
Clin Ther. 2015 Jul 1;37(7):1420-1432.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 11.