Center for Biodiversity Dynamics (CBD), Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zürich, Switzerland.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Oct;97(5):1999-2021. doi: 10.1111/brv.12879. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
Learning is a familiar process to most people, but it currently lacks a fully developed theoretical position within evolutionary biology. Learning (memory and forgetting) involves adjustments in behaviour in response to cumulative sequences of prior experiences or exposures to environmental cues. We therefore suggest that all forms of learning (and some similar biological phenomena in development, aging, acquired immunity and acclimation) can usefully be viewed as special cases of phenotypic plasticity, and formally modelled by expanding the concept of reaction norms to include additional environmental dimensions quantifying sequences of cumulative experience (learning) and the time delays between events (forgetting). Memory therefore represents just one of a number of different internal neurological, physiological, hormonal and anatomical 'states' that mediate the carry-over effects of cumulative environmental experiences on phenotypes across different time periods. The mathematical and graphical conceptualisation of learning as plasticity within a reaction norm framework can easily accommodate a range of different ecological scenarios, closely linking statistical estimates with biological processes. Learning and non-learning plasticity interact whenever cumulative prior experience causes a modification in the reaction norm (a) elevation [mean phenotype], (b) slope [responsiveness], (c) environmental estimate error [informational memory] and/or (d) phenotypic precision [skill acquisition]. Innovation and learning new contingencies in novel (laboratory) environments can also be accommodated within this approach. A common reaction norm approach should thus encourage productive cross-fertilisation of ideas between traditional studies of learning and phenotypic plasticity. As an example, we model the evolution of plasticity with and without learning under different levels of environmental estimation error to show how learning works as a specific adaptation promoting phenotypic plasticity in temporally autocorrelated environments. Our reaction norm framework for learning and analogous biological processes provides a conceptual and mathematical structure aimed at usefully stimulating future theoretical and empirical investigations into the evolution of plasticity across a wider range of ecological contexts, while providing new interdisciplinary connections regarding learning mechanisms.
学习对大多数人来说是一个熟悉的过程,但它在进化生物学中目前还缺乏一个完全发展的理论立场。学习(记忆和遗忘)涉及到根据先前经验或环境线索的累积序列来调整行为。因此,我们建议所有形式的学习(以及一些在发育、衰老、获得性免疫和适应过程中的类似生物学现象)都可以有用地被视为表型可塑性的特殊情况,并通过扩展反应规范的概念来进行形式化建模,包括额外的环境维度来量化累积经验(学习)和事件之间的时间延迟(遗忘)的序列。因此,记忆只是介导累积环境经验对不同时间段表型的遗传效应的许多不同内部神经、生理、激素和解剖“状态”中的一种。学习作为反应规范框架内的可塑性的数学和图形概念化可以轻松适应一系列不同的生态场景,将统计估计与生物过程紧密联系起来。学习和非学习可塑性之间的相互作用,只要累积的先前经验导致反应规范发生变化(a) 升高[平均表型]、(b) 斜率[响应性]、(c) 环境估计误差[信息记忆]和/或(d) 表型精度[技能获取]。在这种方法中,也可以适应创新和在新的(实验室)环境中学习新的关联。因此,一个共同的反应规范方法应该鼓励传统学习和表型可塑性研究之间的思想交叉融合。作为一个例子,我们在不同的环境估计误差水平下,对有学习和没有学习的可塑性进化进行建模,以展示学习如何作为一种特定的适应性,在时间自相关的环境中促进表型可塑性。我们的学习和类似生物过程的反应规范框架提供了一个概念和数学结构,旨在为在更广泛的生态背景下研究可塑性进化提供有用的理论和经验研究的激励,同时提供关于学习机制的新的跨学科联系。