Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎中的 IgA 类风湿因子。

IgA rheumatoid factor in rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Jul 6;60(10):1617-1626. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0244. Print 2022 Sep 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Rheumatoid factor (RF) is a well-established marker for the diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Most studies evaluated IgM RF or isotype-nonspecific total RF assays. We evaluated the added value of IgA RF in this context.

METHODS

An international sample cohort consisting of samples from 398 RA patients and 1073 controls was tested for IgA RF with 3 commercial assays. For all RA patients and 100 controls essential clinical and serological data for ACR/EULAR classification were available.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of IgA RF for diagnosing RA was lower than the sensitivity of IgM RF. Differences in numerical values between IgA RF assays were observed. With all assays, the highest IgA RF values were found in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. Double positivity for IgM RF and IgA RF had a higher specificity for RA than either IgM RF or IgA RF. The sensitivity of double positivity was lower than the sensitivity of either IgA RF or IgM RF. Single positivity for IgA RF was at least as prevalent in controls than in RA patients. Adding IgA RF to IgM RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) did not affect RA classification. However, combined positivity for IgA RF, IgM RF and IgG ACPA had a higher specificity and lower sensitivity for RA classification than positivity for either of the antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

IgA RF showed a lower sensitivity than IgM RF. Combining IgA RF with IgM RF and ACPA did not improve sensitivity of RA classification. Combined positivity (IgA-RF/IgM-RF/ACPA) increased specificity.

摘要

目的

类风湿因子 (RF) 是诊断和分类类风湿关节炎 (RA) 的重要标志物。大多数研究评估了 IgM RF 或非特异性同种型总 RF 检测。在此背景下,我们评估了 IgA RF 的额外价值。

方法

一项国际样本队列研究纳入了 398 例 RA 患者和 1073 例对照者的样本,使用 3 种商业检测方法检测 IgA RF。所有 RA 患者和 100 例对照者均获得了 ACR/EULAR 分类的基本临床和血清学数据。

结果

IgA RF 诊断 RA 的敏感性低于 IgM RF。不同的 IgA RF 检测方法观察到数值差异。所有检测方法中,原发性干燥综合征患者的 IgA RF 值最高。IgM RF 和 IgA RF 双阳性对 RA 的特异性高于 IgM RF 或 IgA RF 单阳性。双阳性的敏感性低于 IgA RF 或 IgM RF 单阳性。IgA RF 单阳性在对照者中的发生率至少与 RA 患者相当。将 IgA RF 添加到 IgM RF 和抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体 (ACPA) 中并未影响 RA 分类。然而,与单独检测抗体相比,IgA RF、IgM RF 和 IgG ACPA 联合阳性对 RA 分类具有更高的特异性和更低的敏感性。

结论

IgA RF 的敏感性低于 IgM RF。将 IgA RF 与 IgM RF 和 ACPA 联合使用并未提高 RA 分类的敏感性。联合阳性(IgA-RF/IgM-RF/ACPA)提高了特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验